Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: stephenjohnbanker; sickoflibs; Condor51; Liz; ontap; cripplecreek; Impy; calcowgirl
Ever notice these 'bots frequently contradict themselves with their talking points?

ARNOLDBOTS TALKING POINTS
1) This ain't your daddy's California. A conservative simply CANNOT win today's California. EVER. No matter what the circumstance. Ain't gonna happen. A RINO is the best we're ever gonna get out of this state. We must all get behind a RINO because ONLY they are ELECTABLE!!
2) California will CEASE to be a one-party state if we elect the almighty Arnold. Arnold will make it COOL to be a Republican again! Over 60% of voters cast ballots for a REPUBLICAN candidate for Governor in 2003!! That puts California IN PLAY for the GOP. Arnold will make this is a RED state and campaign for George W. Bush in 2004!! The Democrats will be running scared once all our conservative candidates on the ticket have ARNOLD supporting them!!!

PERRYBOT TALKING POINTS
1) Rick Perry said he was "fine" with gay marriage becoming the law of the land because he respects STATES RIGHTS. EVERY controversial issue on the planet (like gay marriage, abortion on demand) is the SOLE responsibility of the states and can be magically resolved if we simply "send it back to the states" and wash our hands of it (worked great for slavery?).
2) States have NO right to secure their OWN border. Indeed, Texas should NOT try to pass an AZ-style immigration law. Send it back to the feds to deal with! That is COMPLETELY the federal government's job and Rick Perry shares absolutely NO blame for the zillions of illegals living comfortably in his state and getting subsidized tuition from Texas.


201 posted on 09/11/2011 3:49:26 PM PDT by BillyBoy (Impeach Obama? Yes We Can!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies ]


To: BillyBoy

Just a few random thoughts on the election and candidates.

Right off the top I find it odd that Perry claims to be so wildly opposed to the economic policies of Mitt Romney would choose a man who has supported Romney in the past to be his economic advisor.

I also find it odd that team Perry and the media are trying so hard to get rid of Bachmann when Romney is the supposed threat. They say the race is too crowded and they want Bachmann gone but Paul, Cain, Gingrich, Santorum, McCotter and others can stay. There is something very odd about trying to eliminate the competition before a single primary vote has been taken.

And for the Palin supporters. I’ve always stood in defense of Sarah Palin and I suggest that you should see Michele Bachmann as an insurance policy just in case Palin doesn’t run. If Palin does run, I have no doubt that Bachmann will get out of the race pretty quickly. On the other hand, if Palin doesn’t run, its pretty obvious that we’re going to be saddled with Perry or Romney and quite possibly both.


202 posted on 09/11/2011 4:08:48 PM PDT by cripplecreek (A vote for Amnesty is a vote for a Permenant Democrat majority. ..Choose well.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies ]

To: BillyBoy

LOL. Great imitations.


203 posted on 09/11/2011 6:28:39 PM PDT by calcowgirl ("Sapere Aude!" --Immanuel Kant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies ]

To: BillyBoy

OUTSTANDING

Accolades forthcoming : )


204 posted on 09/11/2011 9:39:42 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (God, family, country, mom, apple pie, the girl next door and a Ford F250 to pull my boat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies ]

To: BillyBoy
He's reminding me of my ol' pals Rudy and Al...

LOL!

207 posted on 09/11/2011 10:40:07 PM PDT by calcowgirl ("Sapere Aude!" --Immanuel Kant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies ]

To: BillyBoy
PERRYBOT TALKING POINTS 1) Rick Perry said he was "fine" with gay marriage becoming the law of the land because he respects STATES RIGHTS. EVERY controversial issue on the planet (like gay marriage, abortion on demand) is the SOLE responsibility of the states and can be magically resolved if we simply "send it back to the states" and wash our hands of it (worked great for slavery?).

2) States have NO right to secure their OWN border. Indeed, Texas should NOT try to pass an AZ-style immigration law. Send it back to the feds to deal with! That is COMPLETELY the federal government's job and Rick Perry shares absolutely NO blame for the zillions of illegals living comfortably in his state and getting subsidized tuition from Texas.

Hell yeah! You ought to look at the Constitution sometime. And the Constitutional amendments.

If there is something written in the Constitution about an issue, then it is a Federal issue. And securing the borders against invasion is specifically addressed in the Constitution.

As for the rest, it's not mentioned, so it's left to the states.

I don't know why any Conservative would support anything different.

209 posted on 09/12/2011 2:22:58 AM PDT by gogogodzilla (Live free or die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies ]

To: BillyBoy
Bill, new term for 'Perrybot'


'Perrydactyl'

Image and name Invented yesterday by a FReeper, and I darn it. I forgot to note who it was (I'll have to search)

210 posted on 09/12/2011 3:59:20 AM PDT by Condor51 (Yo Hoffa, so you want to 'take out consevatives'. Well okay Jr - I'm your Huckleberry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies ]

To: BillyBoy
FReeper sickoflibs did the graphic and naming.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2775775/posts?page=191#191
211 posted on 09/12/2011 4:06:49 AM PDT by Condor51 (Yo Hoffa, so you want to 'take out consevatives'. Well okay Jr - I'm your Huckleberry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson