Posted on 09/08/2011 8:00:19 PM PDT by kristinn
She filled a void — there was not an official repub. response. This is a trait of leadership.
BLAH BLAH BLAH!
Same crap as last time!
I believe all 9 of those steps require Congress to pass or repeal legislation. All the president has is a veto - not to diminish the power of the veto, but Congress can’t blame the president for not starting what is up to Congress to start.
Sarah’s warmup bands. All of them. For different reasons.
I feel it in my gut, but a couple of others are on my short list, too.
“She filled a void — there was not an official repub. response. This is a trait of leadership.”
I hope Bachmann gets more time in future debates.
“Obama’s Legacy:”
Shovel-ready.
NØbama 2012!
Michelly:
I really wish you hadn’t validated this Tard with such a long response, much less a response at all.
“That’s it? or Cram it Clownie” would have sufficed.
words.... just words....
words.... just words....
While Perry and Mitt were doing their “I created more jobs than you” thing, I would have loved to see Bachmann jump in and say - “Wait a minute, neither of you created any jobs. A Governor or President cannot “create jobs”. That is how Democrats think, NOT Republicans.
‘“Wait a minute, neither of you created any jobs. A Governor or President cannot “create jobs”. That is how Democrats think, NOT Republicans.’
Excellent!. You should be her campaign manager.
She nailed it.
At least she had a rebuttal. Did Boehner have a rebuttal? I saw him clapping at the _resident’s remarks.
While Michelle may not have a fine tuned delivery, her grasp of our crisis is dead on balls accurate.
In the news brief I saw, Obama proposes income tax cuts, and corporate tax cuts. In order to cut these taxes, he proposes 400 plus billion in “job creation” spending. All of the jobs he proposes includes govt jobs. First, police fire, and teachers. Then he wants infrastructure jobs aimed at preferential contractors, all surely favored by Obama, and who mostly hires illegals.
Well, the job of congress, at least for those in congress who oppose billions wasted, will be to figure out how to overcome amicably the cuts in income taxes, and corporate income taxes Obama proposed, while spending yet billions more they don’t have creating govt jobs.
I would advise the house to cut the taxes just as he proposed, and deny the new BS spending.
Of course the senate will reject it. Let the tax cut denial fall in Reid’s lap.
As Perry said, the president could issue an executive order telling the head of HHS to give a waiver to every man, woman and child.
No repeal needed to do that.
But the law would still be on the books. So then the next president could just have his HHS rescind all the wavers, and we’re back to where we started.
There simply is no alternative to full repeal of that monstrous law. As long as it’s on the books, it’s a threat to our liberty.
I agree. I was expressing the point as to the idea it would be illegal as was in the post.
Oh, sorry.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.