Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Officials confirm 'credible but unconfirmed' 9/11 threat (Truck bomb suspects include US Citizen)
CNN ^ | 9/8/11 | Barbara Starr, Mike M. Ahlers and Lesa Jansen

Posted on 09/08/2011 6:06:12 PM PDT by jimbo123

U.S. officials said Thursday evening they have "specific, credible but unconfirmed" information about a threat against the United States coinciding with the 10th anniversary of the September 11 terrorist attacks.

"We have received credible information very recently about a possible plot directed at the homeland that seems to be focused on New York and Washington, D.C.," a senior administration official told CNN Pentagon Correspondent Barbara Starr.

The official said the plot was believed to involve three individuals, including a U.S. citizen, who may have entered the United States. U.S. officials believed the threat was a vehicle laden with explosives, but "the intelligence picture is not completely formed," the official said. "Not enough is known about the potential operatives and their plotting."

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: biometrics; fees; policestate; tsa
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last
Bloodthirsty muslims. One of them, a U.S. citizen.
1 posted on 09/08/2011 6:06:14 PM PDT by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jimbo123
"But I think it's fair to say that in addition to asking citizens to be vigilant and so forth, that we have ourselves leaned forward and have made sure that we are doing all that we can from the DHS perspective."

Leaned forward? So Janet is borrowing writers from MSNBC?

2 posted on 09/08/2011 6:10:44 PM PDT by newheart (When does policy become treason?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123
Whitey Hut Definition of Terror Threat: All white males belonging to or supporting the Tea Party movement.

To think anything else would be racist.
3 posted on 09/08/2011 6:11:44 PM PDT by Dallas59 (President Robert Gibbs 2009-2011)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123
What is a US Citizen?

Why NONE of the Obama's relatives are, and his only proof are doctored pdf files!

911 from the top inside.

4 posted on 09/08/2011 6:12:04 PM PDT by rawcatslyentist (It is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; ~Vattel's Law of Nations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

Not to minimize the damage a truck bomb can do, but you’d think the terrorists would be embarrassed to follow up their Twin Towers/Pentagon successes of ten years later with a truck bomb.


5 posted on 09/08/2011 6:13:16 PM PDT by kevao
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

More:

Recent intelligence, obtained within the past day, and originating from the tribal areas of Pakistan, advised the United States of a plan to set off car or truck bombs in Washington or New York around the time of the 9/11 anniversary, officials told NBC News.

The information indicated that three people would travel to the U.S. from Pakistan to carry out an attack, they said. However, the information included very little else in the way of specifics — in terms of timing or target.

Law enforcement officials will be told tonight to be on the lookout for three men “of Middle Eastern descent” and potentially traveling in a van, they said.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/44444344/ns/us_news-security/


6 posted on 09/08/2011 6:13:26 PM PDT by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123
credible but unconfirmed"

"Confirmation to be made right AFTER the explosion!" Napolitano

7 posted on 09/08/2011 6:14:30 PM PDT by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newheart

I suspect that an attack will occur and will be successful. Here’s why. Obama needs something harsh to draw attention away from the Fast and Furious scandal and he needs it to play into stronger Governmental controls on the citizens.

If an attack occurs, there will be a strong move to vindicate BATFE and DOJ and turn them into heroes rather than villains over F&F.


8 posted on 09/08/2011 6:15:44 PM PDT by BCR #226 (02/07 SOT www.extremefirepower.com...The BS stops when the hammer drops.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

Color me skeptical.


9 posted on 09/08/2011 6:15:55 PM PDT by Recovering_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

We didn’t let Germans come ‘visit’ during World War II, why are we allowing men from Pakistan in the country? ( and yeah, I know they’re ‘kinda’ our allies...)


10 posted on 09/08/2011 6:18:07 PM PDT by GOPJ (126 people were indicted for being terrorists in the last two years. Every one of them was Muslim.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat

I live in Manhattan so I’m cautious. Especially because some muzzies were arrested yesterday in Germany trying to build a car bomb.

Germany detains 2 in alleged bomb plot (Muslims building fertilizer bomb)

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2775667/posts


11 posted on 09/08/2011 6:21:33 PM PDT by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: kevao
Not to minimize the damage a truck bomb can do, but you’d think the terrorists would be embarrassed to follow up their Twin Towers/Pentagon successes of ten years later with a truck bomb.

If they are able to successfully able to pull it off, it would be a big boost for them. Truck bombs have been the rule for terror, and just pause and think the loss of life one of those can generate.

12 posted on 09/08/2011 6:22:00 PM PDT by Godzilla (3-7-77)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

Pakistan being ‘kinda’ our allies, as you put it justifies letting members of the Pakistani cabinet and of factions of the Pakistani military and ISI known to be opposed to the factions in the ISI that back the Taliban, and maybe Pakistani Shi’ites (who get attacked by the Taliban and Al Qaeda types perhaps more often than they attack American, our troops in Afghanistan excepted) come to visit. Pakistanis in general, no.


13 posted on 09/08/2011 6:26:35 PM PDT by The_Reader_David (And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat

Color me the same...


14 posted on 09/08/2011 6:27:58 PM PDT by myrabach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: BCR #226
If an attack occurs, there will be a strong move to vindicate BATFE and DOJ and turn them into heroes rather than villains over F&F.

Or better yet, if an attack does NOT occur. Instead they set up a couple of patsies and "stop" them before they can blow anything up. Then they really look like heroes.

15 posted on 09/08/2011 6:29:32 PM PDT by newheart (When does policy become treason?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: kevao
Not to minimize the damage a truck bomb can do, but you’d think the terrorists would be embarrassed to follow up their Twin Towers/Pentagon successes of ten years later with a truck bomb.

What about a dirty nuke or biohazard truck bomb?

16 posted on 09/08/2011 6:30:35 PM PDT by lightman (Adjutorium nostrum (+) in nomine Domini)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Godzilla
just pause and think the loss of life one of those can generate.

I did mention that in my post. But as far as scale goes, a few truck bombs aren't even in the same universe of stunning success as Twin Towers/Pentagon.

To me, it would be an admission that their terrorist network and capabilities have been massively attritted.

17 posted on 09/08/2011 6:34:21 PM PDT by kevao
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123
Well, it is a piss or get off the pot moment. I'm sure they are feeling the pressure to prove themselves especially after the take down of OBL.
18 posted on 09/08/2011 6:37:19 PM PDT by MagnoliaB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lightman

If they really had their hands on a WMD, then they’re running a HUGE risk sitting on it for a specific date instead of just detonating it at the earliest opportunity.

Also, if they really had a nuke device, we’ll probably find out the Obama administration “walked” it to them in order to “trace it.” :)


19 posted on 09/08/2011 6:38:48 PM PDT by kevao
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: kevao

Unless they are nuclear.


20 posted on 09/08/2011 6:38:56 PM PDT by MagnoliaB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson