I’m just wondering why you are so intent on smearing people with no evidence merely because their names are associated with a SuperPac, or because they are part of a campaign.
For example, what is it but “guilt-by-association” to continue to bring up the fact that a Perry campaign guy happens to be the husband of a person who works for Romney? Should they get divorced or something? Should he be fired because his wife works for the wrong GOP candidate? Do you have any evidence that she is influencing him?
I have not seen a single word posted explaining what bad thing is happening because these two are married. It is just thrown out there to smear the couple by association. It is exactly the type of gutter politics that I am glad Sarah Palin has denounced.
It's about control Charles. And loyalty. These people control. And there's only a few of them. They are the elitists. Do you HONESTLY think that "the people" control ANYTHING? The power brokers think otherwise. And as long as you remain blind, they will control.
I was told by a poster that Palin hadn't hired a "crack team". And they saw not a darn thing wrong with what they were saying. They didn't see that elitists control. They learned nothing from the Dems working on McCains Prez bid that purposely sank it. And TRIED to sink Palin. And here we are. 3 years later. The same people control and the blind and naive remain blind and naive.
We heard that sooner or later, everyone gets a "turn". Remember Scozzafava? It was her "turn". It was McCains "turn" too. It was Doles "turn". Whose "turn" is it this time? Probably not who you think.
It's about control. It's about professional politics. And it was NEVER meant to control our Republic. Guilt by association? Absolutely.
Your entire post makes no sense at all. Carville is married to Matlin. Is that smearing? Facts are facts. The Sullivan’s work for two different campaigns. Husband for Perry, his wife for Romeny, and you call making mention of that a smear?
Maybe sea shell collecting is better suited for you.