Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CharlesWayneCT; onyx; trisham
For example, what is it but “guilt-by-association” to continue to bring up the fact that a Perry campaign guy happens to be the husband of a person who works for Romney?

It's about control Charles. And loyalty. These people control. And there's only a few of them. They are the elitists. Do you HONESTLY think that "the people" control ANYTHING? The power brokers think otherwise. And as long as you remain blind, they will control.

I was told by a poster that Palin hadn't hired a "crack team". And they saw not a darn thing wrong with what they were saying. They didn't see that elitists control. They learned nothing from the Dems working on McCains Prez bid that purposely sank it. And TRIED to sink Palin. And here we are. 3 years later. The same people control and the blind and naive remain blind and naive.

We heard that sooner or later, everyone gets a "turn". Remember Scozzafava? It was her "turn". It was McCains "turn" too. It was Doles "turn". Whose "turn" is it this time? Probably not who you think.

It's about control. It's about professional politics. And it was NEVER meant to control our Republic. Guilt by association? Absolutely.

56 posted on 09/06/2011 1:13:11 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (America! The wolves are here! What will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: DJ MacWoW

Palin hired Michael Glassner to be her chief-of-staff. He’s a long-time establishment political operative; he worked for Bob Dole. He was part of the McCain for President team that you criticize here.

I thought it was Romney’s “turn”, and we were dedicated to find a true conservative to stop him. We found a guy Sarah Palin called a “true conservative”, but it seems some want to tear him down for some reason, even though when Sarah Palin gets in the race he’ll be an afterthought.

I not ready to fall into the populist trap. Populism is not conservatism (it’s not liberalism either, it’s an orthoganal trait). I don’t mind a bit of populism. But I’m not going to burn down the corporations simply because they know how to game a system built by our politicians.

We fix government, we limit it’s scope, the corporations have no reason anymore to influence the system. Excessive regulation requires corporations to try to influence the regulators and the regulation-writers to protect themselves, and to turn the regulations on their competitors.

I don’t think the liberals will mind at all if the tea partiers turned into an anti-corporate movement. I don’t think it will happen — most of us are employed by corporations who want nothing more than for the government to let their companies alone to react to market conditions rather than political ones.

Populism becomes more popular in economic downturns, and the liberals are counting on it. I hope we don’t fall into that trap.


98 posted on 09/06/2011 3:40:08 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson