Stremmenos Interview about Skepticism on Cold Fusion And E-cat

Stremmenos Interview about Skepticism on Cold Fusion And E-cat
Last Updated on Wednesday, 24 August 2011 05:24

WRITTEN BY ADMIN
WEDNESDAY, 24 AUGUST 2011 09:19
On January 14, 2011 there were demonstrations based on the cold fusion to prove e-cat home stability and energy efficiency. The scientific community had doubts not only on the e-cat studies but also on these demonstrations. To get to know more about this stremmenos was radio interviewed and was asked about his reaction on this skepticism.

Stremmenos replied through the interviews that, “The dividing line between the skeptics and those in favor is that those in favor have worked, have focused on experimental or theoretical aspects, while the skeptics are just pontificating—pontificating without engaging, without seeing the experimental reality of this system, and of cold fusion in general. Pontificating in an arrogant way; they do not have the humility to recognize that. Moreover, physics and chemistry are experimental sciences, this must be emphasized.”

The interest was shown by other scholars too who were supportive in diminishing the skepticisms. Stremmenos continued with a laugh and said, “It is not the model which prevails—the model follows, being the product of our brain – what prevails is the experimental evidence—that is what counts. Otherwise, science would still be at the Neanderthalensis level!”

Everyone cannot be sure of this, as there are different other substance that might be added into the e-cat home reactor. As a result of which this has been a major issue to talk about. Stremmenos stated that if Rossi did open it, he cannot find anything but dust. It is important to learn about all the different approaches to understand on how the coulomb can be overcome and the reasons of why the nuclear mechanisms are not emitting any kind of radiation.

Stremmenos said that he is a socialist and lives in a society, but is restricted by the values of the man. He said on the context that Science has only aim, and that is for betterment of man and not capitalists. “And Man has two needs: one is food and the other to move, to use energy. If we can decentralize this topic of energy we have solved 50% of the existential problems of a society.” Stremmenos also claimed that instead of pontificating skeptics is only a show off. Therefore it is better to collaborate with already who has worked so can exchange ideas for the betterment of man.

There have been disasters in Japan due to the failures of the nuclear plants as well as the disasters due to the war. When Stremmenos was asked about this he said that Science cannot be stopped as it did not stop with the Inquisition of Galileo. The humanity is facing the crisis mainly due to the political crisis. The political crisis has affected both the food as well as the energy crisis. This is true when seen that Middle East countries are fighting over the oil whereas other countries such as China and Philippines are fighting over the territorial rights.

Stremmenos cited that the Biotechnology has helped in taking the human health to a very big level and that the scientific evolution in the field of energy must be given good support. He also said that the scientific innovation must be approached in such a gradual fashion way that we could accept without damaging.

“It is not a sin, I understand that not everybody agrees with me, but this is inevitable,” Christos Stremmenos said, “You cannot block the development of science, of human knowledge. I am hoping to still have some of my old ancestral genomes, follow two things: One, by Socrates: ?? ???? ??? ????? ???? (“I know one thing, that I know nothing”). And another by Aristotle, who said: ????? ??? ??????? ???????? ???????? (by nature, man has the vocation to knowledge). So it is within us, in fact this is where we differ from the animal world.”
Related posts:

Cold Fusion Evidence Stirs Public Debate Again
Heat Your Home Reliably With Cold Fusion
E-cat Home. Cold Fusion Then And Now
NIF Ready To Take Over Nuclear Fusion
New E-cat Home For Sergio Focardi And Andrea Rossi’s Device

Nothing new from you, just more seagulling.

Squawk!: How to Stop Making Noise and Start Getting Results [Hardcover]

http://www.amazon.com/Squawk-Making-Noise-Getting-Results/dp/0061562343

Travis Bradberry
Travis Bradberry (Author)
› Visit Amazon’s Travis Bradberry Page
Find all the books, read about the author, and more.
See search results for this author
3.9 out of 5 stars See all reviews (93 customer reviews)
93 Reviews
5 star: (32)
4 star: (34)
3 star: (14)
2 star: (10)
1 star: (3)

› See all 93 customer reviews...

List Price: $19.95
Price: $14.08 & eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping on orders over $25. Details
You Save: $5.87 (29%)
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o

In Stock.
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.
Only 3 left in stock—order soon (more on the way).
Want it delivered Wednesday, September 7? Order it in the next 41 hours and 41 minutes, and choose One-Day Shipping at checkout. Details

40 new from $0.93 34 used from $0.28

Editorial Reviews
Review
“I’ve been talking about seagull management for years. If you want to understand how to turn it around, read Travis Bradberry’s Squawk!” (Ken Blanchard, coauthor of The One Minute Manager (R) and The One Minute Entrepreneur (TM) )

“There are several powerful leadership messages woven into this entertaining and memorable parable—teaching me when I was least prepared (and most ready) for it. I have a list of ten colleagues who will be getting a most-unexpected gift.” (Kenneth Forster, director, Global Customer Strategy, the Coca-Cola Company )

“Dr. Bradberry provides a wonderful solution with an easy-to-understand and utilize three-step model that allows you to engage your team and generate improved results. Read it, and you’ll see a positive change in your future!” (Robert Savage, COO, Taco Bell, Yum Brands )

“Squawk! is simple, yet powerful, and very entertaining. It provides a valuable illustration of how to get more from your team, and I was able to get through it in just one flight.” (Dennis Sadlowski, president and CEO, Siemens Energy and Automation )

“Squawk has a central theme I find near and dear—the tendency of managers to move so fast from problem to problem that they forget people are involved. People need time and attention, and this book is an important reminder that great management doesn’t happen on the fly.” (Stephen Lundin, coauthor of Fish! (R) and author of Cats )

“Companies are losing their top talent every day, and many of those departing do so on entrepreneurial wings. If you want to prevent this and learn to keep your flock together in friendlier skies, read this little fable and take its big lessons to heart!” (Michael E. Gerber, bestselling author of the E-Myth and Awakening the Entrepreneur Within )

“Squawk! is as profound as it is fun! A must-read for every manager.” (Ron McMillan, bestselling coauthor of Crucial Conversations, Crucial Confrontations, and Influencer )
Product Description
Unfortunately, we’ve all seen it happen. When faced with a problem, rather than working cooperatively to come up with a solution, your manager or colleagues come swooping in, squawking loudly, dump orders riddled with formulaic advice, and then take off, leaving you and everyone else to clean up the mess. Or—let’s be honest: there may have been a time (or three) when you have been guilty of doing that very thing yourself.

While this happens in every workplace worldwide more frequently than ever, it doesn’t have to. Through the story of Charlie, a seagull who doesn’t understand how his management actions are holding back his flock, Travis Bradberry, Ph.D., reveals the three virtues of great leadership that he has used to help thousands of people and organizations deal with seagull managers in the workplace and, just as important, to avoid being one themselves.

Charlie the seagull is a well-intentioned manager who, when faced with new challenges after previously leading his flock to success, fails to understand how his management style is holding back, rather than helping, his team. Through our bird’s-eye view of Charlie, overconfident Scott, quiet Maya, practical Yufan, and skinny, shy Alfred, we see them and the rest of the flock struggle to solve their problems while absorbing the three virtues of great leadership and teamwork along the way. This entertaining and illuminating fable will help make us all more productive, less prone to depositing messes on the heads of those around us, and more able to work effectively with those who continue to squawk at us every day.

"I sure wish I could understand what ever the heck this article is about. I thought it was about the development of E-CAT but it seems to be a soap box pontification by a bloviating malcontent bereft of media attention. That's all I could decipher from it anyway."

LOL. Which statement proves your complete ignorance of the subject, both the science, and the people involved. Stremenos is a university professor of physics who served as Greece's ambassador to Italy, so he is well versed in both science and "political reality". He has also participated directly in the various demonstrations, and seen the evidence first-hand AS IT WAS GATHERED.

And what he is saying is "STUDY THE DATA WITH AN OPEN MIND".

Which is pretty much the same thing "I" have been saying on all these threads. I "have" studied those reports and videos, and have followed most of the (completely uninformed) criticisms here and elsewhere, and what most of the critics have proven is that they are idiots who don't know their "waste emitter portals" from a hole in the ground. Certainly they CANNOT have actually looked at the data.

Let’s just for argument’s sake assume that Rossi, Focardi and their associates have developed a revolutionary new device that creates virtually unlimited quantities of energy that will profoundly revolutionize society itself. What difference then does it make if there are skeptics? If it works, it works, and they’ll be rich men and us skeptics will have to eat crow. However the attitude on these e-cat threads is either you buy into it, or you are some sort of heretic, demeaning and debasing the heroic efforts of these tireless geniuses. Why do you feel the need to so adamantly defend something that if it were true, defends itself? If it’s true, surely it doesn’t need the Kevmo/WW cheering section. No one had to defend the honor of vulcanized rubber, or the bessemer process. They simply were demonstrable technologies that were self evident even to the layperson. But this one is different. It needs barkers like yourself to protect its virtue from the foulness of the naysayers as you like to label them. The whole impassioned defense thing is unreal and suggests a certain pathology on your part.

"It needs barkers like yourself to protect its virtue from the foulness of the naysayers as you like to label them. The whole impassioned defense thing is unreal and suggests a certain pathology on your part."

LOL. The ONLY thing I have ever advocated on any of these cold fusion threads is that the posters take the time to actually study the available evidence. I see no indication that either you or "Moonpie" have ever done so.

And my only "impassioned defense" is that one draw conclusions based on data, and not supposition.

Do Rossi's demonstrations rise to the level of "scientific proof".....no. But neither is that data the same thing as "no evidence", which is what most of the naysayers claim.

And MOST of the even supposedly "scientific" criticism is simply wrong.

My "real-life" area of scientific expertise is analytical chemistry, and specifically of instrument design. As such, I have real expert knowledge of designing measurement systems for processes (I spent 20 years doing that for one of the world's largest chemical companies). Rossi's reactors are virtual duplicates of what you will find in pretty much any engineering research or process design laboratory. I've designed and installed measurement systems for MANY such. And what my expertise tells me is that the people who put the instrumentation on Rossi's system are NOT amateurs, and knew precisely what they were doing.

In some cases (Levi's 18-hour "no-steam" study), the measurement methods were a bit primitive (his method of measuring water flow rate), but they will certainly develop sufficiently accurate data to answer the question he was investigating. Again, not to the level of "peer-reviewed science", but certainly good enough to make management and financial decisions on.

I've seen mega-million dollar process plants that got their starts with no better initial data.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.