Posted on 09/04/2011 9:30:41 PM PDT by Kevmo
Prof. David Nagel "LENR global impact will be historic"
Dr. Nagel: "(W)hen you look at this field, the science is still wide-open, it is simply not understood what’s going on here. There are some people saying it’s entirely nuclear, some people saying it’s not at all nuclear, some people say it’s a mix of both. There are people saying it’s occurring on surfaces, people say it’s surfaces in bulk. I could go on, but the point is it’s wide-open science.
< When you go from science knowledge to technology and capability, there are things separate from Rossi that are emerging, I think of Mitch Swartz’ experiments from Jet Energy in Boston – you know he makes things move using energy from this. These technologies may or may not be important, and if they are, then they’re going to be developed. ... The reality is, while there’s immensely more interest, it still hasn’t hit the major media, the New York Times, Time magazine....
Now meanwhile... there’s competition. .... Piantelli started using the nickel-hydrogen gas-loading system in the early nineties, and he worked on it for a while. He was joined by Focardi.... Focardi of course is allied now with Rossi."
Dr. Nagel: "Now I have an attitude that some people don’t like and that is the Patent and Trademark Office issues a lot of worthless patents, and that’s not because they’re incompetent or anything, it’s just the nature of the business. People get a patent and it never goes anywhere. I’ve done it myself! So, in a situation, where you inevitably have some patents that are not valuable, what do you lose by granting some patents in an area that has at least a chance of producing safe, clean, green, distributed nuclear power sources, and starting a new industry. And just to take that a step further, there are several government agencies that have mission responsibility, the Department of Energy to make energy sources, the DoD which is a major user, the National Science Foundation in knowledge generation, The Environmental Protection Agency, and the Department of Commerce, specifically the Patent and Trademark Office, and there’s just a dribble of work in the DOD, but the DOE, the EPA, the NSF, and the Patent and Trademark Office are not discharging their responsibilities to the US taxpayer."
________________________________________
Course on LENR entitled Perspectives on Low Energy Nuclear Reactions
weekend of October 3 and 4 in Crystal City, Virginia, near Washington DC.
-----------------------------------------------
James remarked how “it is a different world today versus quite some time ago when I interviewed my first guest on this subject matter; now with Rossi on the map, the interest level has gone up 100% from what it used to be, because now it’s not an if, it’s a when situation. Are you open to people who want to show up who are investors, that want to get into this business?”
Dr. Nagel replied:
“You know when you look at this field, the science is still wide-open, it is simply not understood what’s going on here. There are some people saying it’s entirely nuclear, some people saying it’s not at all nuclear, some people say it’s a mix of both. There are people saying it’s occurring on surfaces, people say it’s surfaces in bulk. I could go on, but the point is it’s wide-open science .
When you go from science knowledge to technology and capability, there are things separate from Rossi that are emerging, I think of Mitch Swartz’ experiments from Jet Energy in Boston – you know he makes things move using energy from this. These technologies may or may not be important, and if they are, then they’re going to be developed. You said it well, when you said things are very different now. Rossi’s just put this whole thing on fast-forward .
The reality is, while there’s immensely more interest, it still hasn’t hit the major media, the New York Times, Time magazine, things like that. If Rossi does what he is planning to do, namely run a 1 Megawatt source for a couple of months, then, it is going to be big news.
You look back in history, 40 some days after the Fleischmann/Pons announcement 23rd of March in 1989, the covers of Time, Newsweek, and US News and World Report I think it was, all had cold fusion on them. It could be a repeat of that if Rossi comes through.
Now meanwhile, as you undoubtedly know, I don’t know if your listeners do, there’s competition. You know the name Piantelli, he’s a professor of physics at University of Sienna in Italy and he started doing experiments on the nickel-hydrogen system which is what Rossi uses; that’s to be distinguished from the palladium-deuterium electro-chemical system that Fleischmann and Pons and many others use.
Piantelli started using the nickel-hydrogen gas-loading system in the early nineties, and he worked on it for a while. He was joined by Focardi. I remember one paper they produced that they got 40-50 Watts excess heat .
Then you move still further down the line, Focardi of course is allied now with Rossi, and if you listen to interviews with these guys on the web, I kid around by saying it’s like an Italian opera! Now, I don’t mean to denigrate them in saying that, but Piantelli says ‘I wish I hadn’t told Focardi so much’, Focardi says ‘I don’t know what Rossi has’ and Rossi say’s ‘I’m not telling anybody!’
Let me emphasize, I am not denigrating them, I have respect for all of them. They are very, very different, but nevertheless, when you look at things coldly, from the viewpoint of an investor, Rossi is the one whose getting the play. But meanwhile Piantelli is setting up a company to produce devices. I’ve heard various renditions of its name, I’m not going to say – I don’t know what’s right for the name of Piantelli’s company. But in any event, I basically like that because competition in a field like this is healthy.
Everybody wins. If they pace each other to do better jobs, that is, to produce equipment that is – you can fill in the blanks, more manufacturable, more reliable, more maintainable, etc, all the “-ilities” – manufacturability, liability, and so forth, that’s good .
But the neat thing is there’s plenty of action in this. There are so many applications of this technology that everybody can win .
I have a very deeply held and almost philosophical viewpoint. If you could use these sources to produce clean water, not only de-salination, but also the clean-up of dirty river water, think of the Ganges for instance, there are a billion+ people in this world who don’t have clean drinking water, and of course with it, have all kinds of health problems.
Imagine we’re twenty years down the road, and LENR sources, I use that instead of cold fusion as you know, and these low-energy nuclear reaction sources turn out to be reliable and small enough you can distribute them in a village and make clean water, the medical impact would be historic .
In fact when I get a little carried away and wonder if they couldn’t be in the same class as antibiotics and vaccines in terms of the impact on the world’s population.
I’m certainly interested in the possibility of heating homes, later producing electricity in a distributed fashion, not using a big central power plant, not burdening the grid. But the thing that most appeals to me in the larger sense is the possibility of making clean water.”
James then dropped the big one: did he know what Mr. Rossi’s formula was?
“I’ve seen his technology but I don’t know at all what his secret is. Now I’ve read the speculation, I have my own suspicions, but no, I am not on the inside of that loop and I don’t know anybody who is .
He undoubtedly, if he’s going to manufacture over 300 of these units to put them together to make the megawatt source next month, next month!, he must have engineers and technicians who actually understand what’s going into it, but I’m not in the know .
If I may, he calls them E-Cat, Energy Catalyzer, and the word ‘catalyzer’ is extraordinarily interesting. I mean you can’t catalyze nuclear reactions. The reason you can’t is because you can’t make the Coulomb barrier go away with some magic formula.
Well what can you catalyze? Why does he call it E-Cat? There are only two things that come to my mind is the splitting of H2 into its atomic atoms, H2 to two H’s. But that’s routine, that’s done in the petroleum and plastics industry all the time .
Well what else?
Maybe he catalyzes the production of an environment that is necessary for LENR. But again, I have no idea. I hope to live long enough to learn it!”
Dr. Nagel is seeking permission to teach a graduate course next year at George Washington University, where he is a research professor, “set in the context of current perspectives in nuclear energy”, which would include LENR.
“It’s not a full course in LENR, it’s going to include fission energy and the prospects for fusion energy. Now, fusion energy is half-a-century off and yet it’s still getting, in round numbers, a quarter-of-a-billion dollars of funding in the US. There’s a 20 billion dollar experiment being built in the south of France for hot fusion, so those things need attention – to be fair to the students, frankly.
If I tried to offer a course entirely on LENR, which is not really in homes yet, not really an existing field of engineering and commerce, then I would probably get frowned on, but if I offer part of a course, then it works…
If it turns out that LENR goes the way many of us hope, that Rossi is successful, Piantelli is successful, one or the other, or both, and you start having [?] that you can buy, then it will be a no-brainer to offer a full course on it.”
Asked about the current attitude of scientists, and if it’s changed since Mr. Rossi’s discovery, inspiring them more, Dr. Nagel responded with
“I would say it’s not so much inspired scientists as investors. There’s a fellow whose involved with this, his name is PJ Keane, an Irishman, with a company called Re Research, and he said once you know something can be done, it’s a different situation, it’s a qualitatively different situation. That does attract different people to jump in. I’m aware of a few startups that haven’t announced yet that are essentially getting into position to join this march, if you will.”
The conversation turned to the serious business of the business of LENR.
James Martinez But here’s the thing, where the rubber meets the road, it’s that people with money, that have thrown money into R&D for all sorts of stuff, which in many cases goes nowhere, and people throwing money into cold fusion, the first question is, who owns it, is this patent pending? Why aren’t they patenting to make this attractive to investors? They bump full-stop regarding the ownership of this.
Dr. Nagel You’ve got it exactly right. In the US, the Department of Commerce Patent and Trademark Office refuses to consider patents in this area.”
James If you don’t have the Patent Office agreeing to move this forwards, what’s the point?
Dr. Nagel It’s an unsolved problem, and it’s a key problem. Now I have an attitude that some people don’t like and that is the Patent and Trademark Office issues a lot of worthless patents, and that’s not because they’re incompetent or anything, it’s just the nature of the business. People get a patent and it never goes anywhere. I’ve done it myself!
So, in a situation, where you inevitably have some patents that are not valuable, what do you lose by granting some patents in an area that has at least a chance of producing safe, clean, green, distributed nuclear power sources, and starting a new industry.
And just to take that a step further, there are several government agencies that have mission responsibility, the Department of Energy to make energy sources, the DoD which is a major user, the National Science Foundation in knowledge generation, The Environmental Protection Agency, and the Department of Commerce, specifically the Patent and Trademark Office, and there’s just a dribble of work in the DOD, but the DOE, the EPA, the NSF, and the Patent and Trademark Office are not discharging their responsibilities to the US taxpayer.
James This is the real issue to me. Who are these guys taking their orders from?
Dr. Nagel I think I understand it along the following lines. I’ve talked to staffers in the office of the Vice-President, the Speaker of the House, several Congressman, several Senators, I’ve been in the Executive Department and all, universally, in one way of phrasing it or another, the people are saying ‘Dave, we’re not scientists. This is a scientific issue, have the science committee look at it.’
I say, OK fine, where’s the national brain trust? You have the National Academy of Science, National Academy of Engineering and the medical equivalent, the National Institute of Medicine,and they have the National Research Council, which does studies, and they’re very good studies, I’ve participated in some of them.
So somebody in the government wants a study done, they pay, I’m guessing, a couple million to the National Research Council and they organize a good group of people and conduct reviews and write a very well-organized and scrubbed report.
So I got in touch, I wrote a letter to the appropriate person in the National Research Council, and never got an answer back. I’ve got all these people distributed throughout the government, saying hey have the scientific community look at that. I go to a high enough level in the nation so that statements made by that level, the National Research Council, would be valued and actionable, and I can’t even get in the door to talk to them. I’m not selling them anything, I’m not asking for money. I’m just trying to inform them.
James talked about a recently declassified document that claimed ‘the US wanted to lead the world’ in this area .
“The patent situation is a global situation. So what we have in the US is one thing, and I must interject, there are a few patents in this area that have been granted for odd reasons. But when you look at things globally, Piantelli has a patent, I think another patent application in Italy, Rossi has got applications I think in Europe as well, I’m not absolutely sure, it’s not the US, that I know of anyway.
We could get into a situation, we’re largely in it already, where this technology coming out as it did from the US, attracts defensible patents abroad that essentially mean we’re in a lose-lose situation. We don’t have the IP, the Intellectual Property, and therefore we don’t have the manufacturing base.
One of the nice things, you mentioned along the way about Rossi in Florida, and he is very much for the US. He is living in the US, he wants to stay in the US. I view that with an element of relief. So it could be, as a sort of an oddity, an accident, the intellectual property mess notwithstanding, that the US does not completely lose the ball here.”
James announced “Money is not the issue anymore. There’s loads of it ready to spend on this; now, today, ready to go. It’s the bureaucracy and a clogged up legal system that is stopping this. I know people that could do it, and are ready to do it, and they’re stopping cold. Investors are wondering, who’s going to own this?” James continued, “It’s a weird bizarre catch-22 situation. And everything stops in the tracks.”
“You mentioned something that is hopeful, and that is the possibility of a new nuclear industry. You know, if that happens, we’re going to have to educate a workforce to design, manufacture, install and maintain and, .. these managers, engineers, sales people and so forth. So it’s one of those things where the situation may just run over the Patent Office, for instance, where they get to a point where it is widely recognized, not only in the public but in Congress, that they are not doing their jobs in ignoring this area. Once that happens, then they’ll flip around and proceed reasonably, but that should’ve happened a long time ago.”
James then asked, “how long would it take in years to integrate this technology into our lives and businesses?”
“If you asked me that question a year ago, that is before Rossi burst on the scene, I would’ve said …eh… ten years, something like that, and now, I think I can say a few years, maybe a couple even. If Rossi demonstrates this megawatt source, makes a significant amount of money to essentially profit from what he’s done, then he, or the new American company Ampenergo, or the Greek company Defkalion, if they can start selling individual units, you know a few kilowatt units for use in homes or small factories and so forth, then it’s fast forward. It could happen.
Once it’s for sale, and if Rossi can make 330 of them, each with a sensor and a control element so that he can turn it up if one sags, and turn one down if it starts to get too hot, and put them in a box, and run them for an extended period of time, then he can make individual units and sell them. It’s a matter of will.
There’s a very vigorous argument about why isn’t he going at this from the low end and building up to the high end, the megawatt level, rather than jumping in at that [high power] level, and I don’t know, it’s undoubtedly a business decision. In any event, I say that if this integrated system works, I am quite confident myself that the small units, the individual units within it, will work as stand alone items.”
When asked if his primarily application interest is clean water, Dr. Nagel replied,
“Yes, and again I say it’s for almost a morality issue. Aids medicines are sold in Africa at reduced prices. What if we could sell into Africa and Bangladesh and bunch of other places, E-Cat or other LENR units at favorable prices, assuming that they are as they promise: safe, reliable, green, then it would be a dramatic thing. You know, you charge full price to the good folks in Orange County, but let’s give the folks in Botswana a break .
You still make money on it, don’t get me wrong, I’m not talking about charity. I’m talking about a pricing structure that would help ensure that this technology is not just another technology, but it has an opportunity for beneficial impacts that go literally global.”
******************************************************************
________________________________________
Course on LENR entitled Perspectives on Low Energy Nuclear Reactions
weekend of October 3 and 4 in Crystal City, Virginia, near Washington DC.
Yes. A one megawatt working reactor delivered to a customer in October. This will be very exciting.
No, it shows that people who can’t think inductively often ask for DEDuctive proof, like you just did. Most of them don’t even know the difference between inductive and deductive reasoning.
Never attack a 3-headed dog with a 2-pronged pitchfork.
Incidentally, deductive and inductive reasoning are irrelevant here since they are methods of arriving at conclusions of truth based on a set of known facts (formal logic), and as it stands Rossi et al have provided no facts, only vague conjectures, hints, testimonies of dubious worth, and wholly qualitative opinions that have no factual value. No amount of reading obscure papers or coming up to snuff on LENR will tell me what Rossi has in his coffee can unless he explicitly discloses that information himself. That is why your suggestions are not only a waste of time, they are insulting to suggest that “the truth is right there” if only you could see it. Well I see an emperor with no clothes. It is not my job to read between the lines and try to reverse engineer their methods. The burden of proof that their claims are genuine lies squarely with them. That is something that requires no obscure paper to understand. Either you get it, or you don’t.
Tch tch. Back again, and using the same old tactics, I see. I thought you were going to start actually using scientific critiques??
I'll ask one question. Have YOU actually read all the reports from those who attended the Rossi demonstrations, and watched the videos of same??
"Pathetic."
Indeed. One who criticizes without having fully studied the available data IS pathetic.
"And yes, your posts should be filed under “blogs”."
So, hit the "Abuse" button and explain that to the moderators. There "is" a mechanism for having that question decided.
WW is the “mini-me” of these e-cat threads. Coming in later to nip at the heels of those insolent detractors like a rabid chihuahua. It’s comical.
Uh, dude. I'm on the west coast. And it's 4:20AM here. You just "might" want to factor that into your thinking (IF you think, that is).
When I was in school studying to be a scientist, submitting even one paper that began with an undefined abbreviation (such as LENR) would've had led to my abrupt expulsion.
Happened to catch the title of the article and took a look, sounds interesting, although I have no knowledege of LENR potential. Anyway, you guys guys sound alike a real congenial bunch! Hope someone figures it out lol!
Just 25 days until October, I guess we will all find out soon.
Incidentally, deductive and inductive reasoning are irrelevant here
***Deductive reasoning is irrelevant because all of the facts are not available, or hidden. It is common for those who confuse deductive and inductive reasoning to lump the two together, which is invalid.
since they are methods of arriving at conclusions of truth based on a set of known facts (formal logic),
***Seems like a close enough approximation of inductive reasoning.
and as it stands Rossi et al have provided no facts, only vague conjectures, hints, testimonies of dubious worth, and wholly qualitative opinions that have no factual value.
***Testimonies are facts; it is your own opinion that leads you to conclude they are of dubious worth. That is the classic fallacy of a priori reasoning.
No amount of reading obscure papers or coming up to snuff on LENR will tell me
***This is just an excuse not to come up to speed. There is plenty of information available on LENR to arrive at conclusions, without ever considering Rossi’s case.
what Rossi has in his coffee can unless he explicitly discloses that information himself.
***In effect, what you are doing here is using the “poisoning the well” fallacy, trying to poison the well of reasoning by drawing from Rossi’s behavior rather than looking at the overall set of facts in LENR. Then you proceed to use the lack of evidence as an excuse to insert your own unresearched opinion on the matter.
That is why your suggestions are not only a waste of time, they are insulting to suggest that “the truth is right there”
***Your words, not mine.
if only you could see it.
***My words would be along the lines of, “If only you could reason properly, quit using logical fallacies, and come up to speed on the facts rather than constantly relying on a priori inner opinions. “
Well I see an emperor with no clothes.
***Maybe Rossi is a con artist (naked emperor), maybe he isn’t. The LENR field has plenty of clothing and this Rossi dude is just a flamboyant player.
It is not my job to read between the lines and try to reverse engineer their methods.
***No one says it is. But while you’re busy not doing what is not your job, you engage several classic fallacies which suggest that your reasoning processes are simply invalid. Why should Freepers listen to you if you continue to argue fallaciously?
The burden of proof that their claims are genuine lies squarely with them.
***That’s what the demo in October is all about. In the meantime, the burden of proof DOES NOT lie with them.
That is something that requires no obscure paper to understand. Either you get it, or you don’t.
***Yes, I see clearly that you don’t get it. Rossi is engaging in business , which does not have the same level of necessary scientific proof as professors in science. This is just yet another area where you don’t seem to get it.
I simply want proof of the quality that stands the scrutiny of the scientific community at large.
***Never attack a 3-headed dog with a 2-pronged pitchfork. Your requirement for DEDUCTIVE proof at a time when ONLY INDUCtive evidence is available is attacking the problem with a 2-pronged pitchfork. It is the typical commingling of deductive logic in an inductive field of view that we see when someone does not know how to reason properly.
Evidently, the people you’ve been cheerleading on these threads for months simply can’t deliver.
***This is raising the bar for cold fusion while lowering it for hot fusion. Also, Rossi has imposed his own self-deadline in October, so your conclusion that he can’t deliver is invalid until then. Again, this is typical commingling of deductive logic in an inductive field of view that we see when someone does not know how to reason properly.
Your threads always degenerate into personal attacks about how the skeptics lack the necessary reasoning skills,
***that’s because most of them do lack such skills
familiarity with background on lenr,
***that’s because most of them do lack the background or are just too lazy to do the reading
etc, but no acknowledgment whatsoever that Rossi et al can’t deliver demonstrable, verifiable, reproducible PROOF that their quite grandiose claims are genuine.
***a priori fallacious reasoning, since Rossi has given his own self-imposed deadline of the end of October.
It’s all smoke and mirrors up to this point, mutually laudatory blogs, arm waving, and hope.
***Then it should be easy enough to find the mistakes in logical reasoning. Instead, you’re the one using invalid reasoning.
It’s the scientific equivalent of the Obama phenomenon,
***Oh, this is just so *Precious*... Like Godwyn’s law, where the first person in a debate who compares the other side to Hitler loses, this is the Free Republic version: Whoever compares the other side to Obama, loses.
lots of smoke, lots of talking big, but zero proof to substantiate the extraordinary claims.
***October, dude.
Then you pull out that rediculous “seagull” stuff
***The seagull stuff is a vivid description of what you are doing here.
http://www.rupertwhite.co.uk/Letter_to_a_seagull.htm
and accuse those skeptical of peeing on your little hope party with such unreasonable demands as proof.
***First, take a writing class. You just said the opposite of what you wanted to say. Second, take a freshman level critical thinking class.
Yep. Kevmo's blog regurgitations are nothing more than hype, innuendo, speculation, and misdirection, yet Wonder Warthog comes in and criticizes us for not being scientific. And Wonder Warthog has nothing scientific to say either.
ping
If somebody copy and pasted from blogs once or twice daily about hot fusion the way you do about cold fusion, they'd be receiving criticism too.
Kevmo: This is raising the bar for cold fusion while lowering it for hot fusion.
Moonboy: If somebody copy and pasted from blogs once or twice daily about hot fusion the way you do about cold fusion, they’d be receiving criticism too.
***There’s nothing wrong with criticism if it is valid. This is an invalid criticism. And besides, where is there anything in that statement that suggests I’m whining about receiving criticism. Why is it that it takes so much effort to get you to reason properly?
Who died and made you the authority on what constitutes valid criticism? It’s not valid because it might expose the con-man you’re running interference for? Oh, and nice insult there towards moonman62. Keep it classy.
Why does the notion of skepticism and the desire for proof regarding Rossi’s and Focardi’s extraordinary claims, not just from me but from numerous other posters disturb you so much?
***It does not disturb me. I have the desire for proof as well. Proof is not available at this time. Therefore the request for it is simply invalid. Rossi has a self-imposed deadline of Oct 31 and anything that hints that he cannot or has not provided proof is invalid. You are so blinded by your pathological distaste that you can’t seem to reason properly.
Don’t bother saying it doesn’t because your virulent defensive attitude on these threads says otherwise.
***Well then, I’m glad I wrote what I wrote, before I had read this comment. Your virulent offensive attitude shows that you’re a pathological naysayer. Don’t bother saying it isn’t so.
If you are so convinced that these claims are true, then please explain the mechanism in your own words.
***I have, on multiple cold fusion threads, and many of them prior to Rossi showing up on the scene.
If you have read all the relevant literature as you claim,
***I do not claim to have read ALL, just enough to be familiar with what’s going on. It is obvious from our interactions that you have not read enough to be familiar. You do yourself and others a disservice when you take such an approach.
then simply give us the Reader’s Digest version, that shouldn’t be too difficult.
***It is utterly difficult. The effect is difficult to replicate and the field has intense harsh (and invalidly dismissive) scrutiny generated from the hot fusion crowd.
Touch briefly on the steps taken to safeguard measurement integrity from error or fraud if you would.
***For the rational lurkers, here is the place to start:
The Introduction to LENR-CANR section, featuring A Student’s Guide to Cold Fusion and books, videos and links to other sites about LENR. For a quick update on the status of cold fusion in 2009, see What is believed about cold fusion? A more detailed discussion of the lastest findings is in Scientific Overview of ICCF15.
News, download tally.
A look at experiments: photographs of laboratories and equipment.
Special collections of papers, including papers from ICCF conferences, the 2004 DoE review, the Bhabha Atomic Research Centre (BARC) and U.S. Navy authors.
The Library guide: instructions for finding papers, downloading papers directly, and how to find the most recent papers.
http://www.lenr-canr.org/FilesByDate.htm
The LIBRARY is a collection of papers integrated with our bibliography.
Not that Rossi would fudge the numbers or anything. Wasn’t he jailed in 1995 for conspiracy to engage in tax fraud or something like that?
***Something like that.
I’m sure it’s just a rumor. Anyway, if you could just briefly summarize Rossi’s device it in your own words, it would demonstrate a working understanding of the subject matter you cheerlead for thread after thread.
***If that is what you want, then start a thread for that purpose. I was involved with LENR before Rossi came along.
The End of Snide Remarks Against Cold Fusion
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2265914/posts
Friday, June 05, 2009 5:56:08 PM · by Kevmo · 95 replies · 1,770+ views
Free Republic, Gravitronics.net and Intrade ^ | 6/5/09 | kevmo, et al
Or could it be that you are just full of it,
***Maybe you’re the one who is just full of it. I have money in my pocket as a result of Dr. Arata’s experiment being replicated.
How I Made Money from Cold Fusion
Saturday, January 23, 2010 12:28:49 PM · by Kevmo · 28 replies · 1,013+ views
Exclusive Article for Free Republic | 1/23/10 | Kevmo
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2435697/posts
have neither the technical background nor training to render a meaningful opinion regarding industrial and applied surface chemistry, and simply read things you don’t understand to say you read them?
***I have posted before what my background is. I’m as pedestrian as the next freeper, so there is simply no reason why I should be able to find so many logical fallacies being used by the LENR Naysayers. If you’re so smart, then dismantle the science claims being generated in the field of LENR. Start here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/coldfusion/index?tab=articles
Blind enthusiasm and a bullying attitude isn’t considered technical rigour.
***I see no technical rigour in your posts. I see a bullying attitude in the naysayers’ posts. I mean, come on, one of them suggested that I shouldn’t even be a freeper. That’s over-the-top bullying and pathological attachment to an issue. My enthusiasm is not blind; you hint at this when you suggest that I read things I do not understand when it comes to this field.
And I’m glad you understand the difference between deduction and induction. The latter is ubiquitous in the literature, especially some areas of elementary math, but is logically flawed in the strictest sense incidentally.
***Bowl Sheet. Like most of your posts.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.