To: Nachum
So, have them sign an agreement not to sue if their garb causes them harm on the rides. Mayhap several more of them will lose their lives by being stupid and a lesson learned.
Not trying to be harsh, just getting tired of people trying to be stupid on purpose.
10 posted on
08/30/2011 7:41:36 PM PDT by
doc1019
(You do not need a parachute to skydive. You only need a parachute to skydive twice.)
To: doc1019
You think that piece of paper will stop a very expensive law suit???
it won’t. It might as well be toilet paper.
To: doc1019
Maybe invent the Muslim Garb Terror Machine.
13 posted on
08/30/2011 7:44:00 PM PDT by
eyedigress
((Old storm chaser from the west)?)
To: doc1019
I just can't get my head around muslims going to a place called Playland.
It reminds me of that story last year about some British amusement park sponsoring a Muslim Fun Day.
I still chuckle over that.
14 posted on
08/30/2011 7:45:28 PM PDT by
HIDEK6
To: doc1019
If you were a ride operator or the company that owned the park, do you believe that these people would not sue? No hold-harmless agreement is worth anything if they get hurt.
Nope, if the park felt it was dangerous, there was little else they could do.
15 posted on
08/30/2011 7:45:49 PM PDT by
Nachum
(The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
To: doc1019
"So, have them sign an agreement not to sue if their garb causes them harm on the rides".
That would not necessarily protect the park. Courts will reject an indemnity agreement they deem unreasonable. A court could still find the park negligent if there was an accident.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson