(1) I’ve been reading Buchanan for ten years - please point to me where Buchanan has ever denied the Holocaust. I have never seen this in his writing.
(2) I’m quite sure I remember Buchanan discussing that subject on several occasions.
(3) You’re wrong.
Buchanan is a conservative and a nationalist. He aligns himself with American citizens. That is why Buchanan rejects “entangling alliances.”
(4) Buchanan rejects “entangling alliances” period - with NATO, with East Asia, with Israel, etc. It is self centeredness on your part to interpret Buchanan’s platform as fear and loathing of Israel when it is plainly something else.
If Buchanan were singling out Israel, then he would be for NATO. Israel isn’t a NATO power, but Buchanan wants to dissolve NATO.
(5) Winston Churchill really did play a major role in starting WW2. That is a historical fact. It was Churchill and friends who pushed the British government into WW2.
(6) Where does Buchanan praise Hitler in his book? Buchanan is a historian, not a Neo-Nazi. Do you think WW2 was the best option for Britain and the Jewish people?
I mean ... it looks to me like the Jews lost WW2, right?
(7) Please try your best ... I eat neocons for breakfast and progressives for dinner.
“Please try your best”
I’d have to care about you to try, and you are nothing to me.
Indeed, less than nothing.