Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: arrogantsob
You cannot show ONE inaccuracy or falsehood posted by me.

The above statement is a falsehood in itself as I have previously shown several. I've already demonstrated that your replies are riddled with lies based on your emotional state of hatred for your fellow countrymen. You will not go unchecked, you arrogant sob.

Secession is destruction of the Union by its very nature.

The Union remained intact, otherwise it would not have been referred to as The Union. That is irrefutable. (I'll type slower if that'll help.)

You have not stated ONE “fact” merely showed

We've already gone over this and you're such a dullard that you simply can't grasp it.

You've previously stated that the federal government was completely controlled by the South up until 1860. I exposed that for absurdity that it was.

You've previously stated that the Union was no threat to the CSA. I carefully explained that the US had a standing army that was actively engaged in conquest in Mexico, the genocide of the western indigenous tribes and garrisons at forts all over the CSA.

You've previously stated that the US army had to be completely reconstituted. I exposed that for the absurdity that it was.

I have without doubt researched this issue far more extensively than you

It doesn't show, you arrogant sob.

It would be asking too much for you to read anything written by a real historian.

Why don't you give us a list of the 'real historians' that you've read and what their background is. No doubt they'll all be Ivy League yankees. No bias there, right?

The truth would be too much for you. . Perhaps even fatal.

Coming from you? Possibly.......

311 posted on 09/20/2011 1:56:27 PM PDT by cowboyway (Molon labe : Deo Vindice : "Rebellion is always an option!!"--Jim Robinson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 309 | View Replies ]


To: cowboyway
Unfortunately for you and the Lovers of the Cornfederacy, it takes more than a CLAIM to a refutation to make a refutation. And a CLAIM is all you have.

You have “demonstrated” NOTHING.

No fact has been addressed with any sensibility. My “fellow countrymen” are those who defend and support the Union and the Constitution not those who attacked it with force of arms.

I be an American not a Confederate. Of course the Union remained intact since it was created by men of genius and foresight like Washington and Hamilton who warned of the danger to the American People posed by secessionists. That was the message of Washington's Farewell Address written by his protege, Hamilton. However, its survival was despite the best efforts of the Traitors you love.

Every president except the Adams was either a slave owner or a supporter of the slavers. Southern control of the US government is indisputable and, naturally, you don't even address it except to shriek that it isn't true.

You just don't WANT to admit the truth. Yes, the federal army was so weak and unprepared that Lincoln had to call for thousands of volunteers and then a draft just as we had to do in WWII. Of course, by the absurd logic that you live in, since we fought WWI we were fully prepared for WWII. Don't you see how ridiculous an argument that is? Can you really be that blind?

I dare you to address this FACT. In 1860 there were all of 16,000 men in the US Army most, as you helpfully pointed out, IN THE WEST. Another FACT: The Cornfederate States began to raise an army of 100,000, SIX TIMES THE SIZE OF THE US ARMY.

Your ridiculous whine about US genocide against the Indians becomes hysterically hypocritical when you compare that to enslavement of millions of blacks by the Traitors you defend. Then when you consider the record towards the Indians of the Texas Rangers and Texans in general in that period your hypocrisy is stunningly obvious.

BTW many of the US troops you slander were protecting Texans by killing Indians who were killing Texans. While there is little doubt that the most outstanding scholars in almost every field are concentrated in the Ivy League, I have no belief in their omnisecence and readily read even the crackpots and whackjobs who make up your canon of knowledge. Not being anti-intellectual I readily examine all ideas even those as dumb as the ones you accept as reality.

316 posted on 09/21/2011 1:52:59 PM PDT by arrogantsob (Why do They hate her so much?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 311 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson