You cannot show ONE inaccuracy or falsehood posted by me.
Secession is destruction of the Union by its very nature.
There is only one butt I kiss.
You have not stated ONE “fact” merely showed your rampaging feelings that the RAT Rebellion must have been justified even though there is not one fact supporting your feelings.
I have without doubt researched this issue far more extensively than you as your silly comments show. All you can do is call me names. Hint: read some books with titles which do not start with “The Real History of...”, “The Truth Behind ....”, “The Secret History of ....”, “The Hidden History of....”. It would be asking too much for you to read anything written by a real historian. The truth would be too much for you. Perhaps even fatal.
The above statement is a falsehood in itself as I have previously shown several. I've already demonstrated that your replies are riddled with lies based on your emotional state of hatred for your fellow countrymen. You will not go unchecked, you arrogant sob.
Secession is destruction of the Union by its very nature.
The Union remained intact, otherwise it would not have been referred to as The Union. That is irrefutable. (I'll type slower if that'll help.)
You have not stated ONE “fact” merely showed
We've already gone over this and you're such a dullard that you simply can't grasp it.
You've previously stated that the federal government was completely controlled by the South up until 1860. I exposed that for absurdity that it was.
You've previously stated that the Union was no threat to the CSA. I carefully explained that the US had a standing army that was actively engaged in conquest in Mexico, the genocide of the western indigenous tribes and garrisons at forts all over the CSA.
You've previously stated that the US army had to be completely reconstituted. I exposed that for the absurdity that it was.
I have without doubt researched this issue far more extensively than you
It doesn't show, you arrogant sob.
It would be asking too much for you to read anything written by a real historian.
Why don't you give us a list of the 'real historians' that you've read and what their background is. No doubt they'll all be Ivy League yankees. No bias there, right?
The truth would be too much for you. . Perhaps even fatal.
Coming from you? Possibly.......