Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wasserman Schultz attacks Bachmann suggestion of Everglades drilling
The Hill ^

Posted on 08/29/2011 11:40:40 AM PDT by Sub-Driver

Wasserman Schultz attacks Bachmann suggestion of Everglades drilling By Michael O'Brien - 08/29/11 01:28 PM ET

Florida Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, the chairwoman of the Democratic National Committee (DNC), thwacked Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.) for saying she would consider allowing fossil fuel exploration in the Everglades.

Wasserman Schultz seized on comments by Bachmann, a Republican presidential candidate, suggesting she would allow exploration for oil or natural gas in the preserved Florida areas if it could be done responsibly.

"We need to look forward and invest in the future, and we won’t get there with unthinkable, reckless and irresponsible Republican proposals like drilling for oil in the Everglades," Wasserman Schultz said Monday in a statement. "As a Floridian, I can see that Michele Bachmann's outrageous proposal to drill for oil and natural gas in the Everglades, demonstrates just how out of touch Republicans are with the needs of Floridians and all Americans."

Bachmann raised the possibility of allowing exploration in the Everglades during a video interview Sunday with The Associated Press.

"The United States needs to be less dependent on foreign sources of energy, and more dependent on American resourcefulness," Bachmann told the AP. "Whether that is in the Everglades or whether that is in the eastern Gulf region or whether that is in North Dakota, we need to go over the energy rules."

The congresswoman, a Tea Party favorite, has made energy a key element of her campaign trail rhetoric as she pursues the Republican presidential nomination. Bachmann vowed earlier this month in South Carolina that, were she elected, the price of gasoline would fall to less than $2 per gallon. She didn't back down from that remark.

Bachmann said that her approval of drilling in the Everglades — or anywhere else — would depend on whether she thought it could be done responsibly.

"If we can't responsibly access energy in the Everglades, then we shouldn't do it," she said. "No one wants to hurt or contaminate the earth. We don't want to harm our water ... From there, though, that doesn't mean that the two have to be mutually exclusive. We can protect the environment, and do so responsibly, but we can also protect the environment and not kill jobs in America, and not deny ourselves access to the energy resources that America's been so blessed with."

The issue of offshore drilling has always been a touchy political issue in Florida, where the tourism industry depends on clean beaches. That industry was jeopardized last year as a result of the BP oil spill off the coast of Louisiana, the effects of which extended to Florida. Support for drilling offshore in Florida, in the past, has often hinged on its distance from the shore.

That makes Bachmann's comments even more politically thorny, given Florida's status as both a key primary state and a key swing state in the general election.

"Michele Bachmann’s latest proposal to drill in the Florida Everglades is just another example of the Republican Party supporting policies that would only further enrich the special interests, while putting our environment and working families at risk," the Wasserman Schultz said.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bachmann; fl; florida; wassermanschultz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last
To: Sub-Driver; John Semmens
while putting our environment and working families at risk," the Wasserman Schultz said.

Debbie, you could walk into the everglades and ugly the crude oil out of the ground. John, here is one you can hit out of the park.

41 posted on 08/29/2011 12:27:12 PM PDT by Arrowhead1952 (Dear God, please let it rain in Texas. Amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
For nearly 50 years, the Audubon Society allowed an oil company to operate 13 wells in the sanctuary. The company had to comply with strict stipulations such as no pumping during the nesting season. In exchange, Audubon earned more than $25 million and was able to buy additional land for conservation with its profits. It appears now that Audubon’s Bernard Baker Sanctuary in Michigan is following in Rainey’s footsteps. In this case, the oil well was placed on private property bordering the preserve with a drill that slants into the sanctuary’s reserves. Terry Anderson and Laura Huggins interviewed Mike Boyce, Bernard’s resident manager, for their book Greener Than Thou. Boyce claimed the agreement earned $500,000 for Audubon and that Baker is in negotiations with another company and private landowner to build an oil rig on the other side of the Sanctuary.
42 posted on 08/29/2011 12:27:20 PM PDT by Pan_Yan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ozzymandus

Wassaerman Shultz is an amateur.

Debbie Stabenow has been demanding that Canada stop drilling under the great lakes. So far they seem to be ignoring her.


43 posted on 08/29/2011 12:27:50 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Bachmann should take Wasserman Schultz’s comments as a gift, that instead of responding meekly, she should tear in the Democrats insane push to ruin America by stopping energy production.

And part of that, air conditioning, is very close to the hearts of Floridians.

“Would you like to live outside in the heat and humidity of the Florida summer? Want to see the inside walls of your homes covered in sweat and black mold? To never feel cool and clean? To not be able to drive or fly away when it is that bad out? THAT’s what the Democrats want for you! Like being homeless and camping out in the swamp. THAT’s what the Democrats are trying desperately to do. THEY want to make all our lives miserable and nasty, because they have weird fantasies about tearing down America.”


44 posted on 08/29/2011 12:29:54 PM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indianrightwinger
This is plain dumb politically speaking to bring up drilling in the Everglades.

Perhaps, but I'd find it rather enjoyable to drill in the everglades just to tick ol' Wassername Schlitz off a bit!

45 posted on 08/29/2011 12:32:03 PM PDT by meyer (We will not sit down and shut up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek; All
Debbie Stabenow has been demanding that Canada stop drilling under the great lakes. So far they seem to be ignoring her.

And her ex-husband didn't listen to her rules on drilling either, especially in or around Exit 69, Big Beaver Road ( I am not making that up...)

We need a better Senator...

46 posted on 08/29/2011 12:33:11 PM PDT by taildragger (( Palin / Mulally 2012 ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
Bachmann: Environmentalists blocking US energy

Somehow I doubt there would be much screaming if she had suggested tuirning the everglades into an enormous wind farm.
47 posted on 08/29/2011 12:34:37 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

48 posted on 08/29/2011 12:35:05 PM PDT by SparkyBass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DManA

“I had no idea.”

Neither had I. But I figured I’d better look before commenting. Pretty interesting, eh?


49 posted on 08/29/2011 12:35:40 PM PDT by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ( Ya can't pick up a turd by the clean end!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: meyer
I like this comment from Bachmann.

"Instead of thinking we are beggars out here begging for oil and for energy, we are the king daddy dogs when it comes to energy,"
50 posted on 08/29/2011 12:35:56 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: taildragger

I don’t think we could do much worse than Stupidcow.


51 posted on 08/29/2011 12:37:43 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Bogus Pachysandra
You certainly don't get that info from reading that Hill article.

Republican Party supporting policies that would only further enrich the special interests,

Whereas Democrats support policies that only impoverish everyone except special interests. The two parties compliment each other perfectly.

52 posted on 08/29/2011 12:40:28 PM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: DManA

Is there any indication that there is oil under the everglades?... I looked and can’t find any explorations there. However, just from my experience a few months ago, it wasn’t anything but saw grass, alligators and canals to get through. I don’t see how they could drill it anyways, unless directional. Place was wild, but sort of a mindboggling...nothing. (Waiting for flames).


53 posted on 08/29/2011 12:51:00 PM PDT by Safetgiver (I'd rather die under a free American sky than live under a Socialist regime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Washerwoman-Schultz should know something about drilling!

She’s scheduled for a frontal lobotomy.


54 posted on 08/29/2011 1:04:17 PM PDT by IbJensen (Welfare: putting a cake under the sink expecting that it wonÂ’t attract cockroaches.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Safetgiver
Is there any indication that there is oil under the everglades?

Yes, keep reading down the thread. We have produced oil from the area for decades.

55 posted on 08/29/2011 1:06:15 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: thackney

The Raccoon Point Oil Wells are an extraction inside the Everglades Big Cypress preserve, originally conducted by Exxon in 1978. These sites produce comparatively little oil, about 1,800 barrels a day from 5 operating wells, and the crude oil is generally low-grade and high in sulfur content. The deposits are located about 2 miles below the surface, known as the Sunniland Trend, and is extracted by Calumet of Florida who lease drilling rights from Collier Enterprises.

Once the oil is extracted, a 4,000-foot pipeline transports the oil to the Miccosukee Indian Reservation north of Interstate 75, and from there it is trucked to Port Everglades. It is then barged to Gulf Coast refineries. At the site, holding tanks, storage areas and pumps are arranged around a central staging area, with brine surrounding the platforms to catch any spillage. The wells at Raccoon Point are powered mostly by natural gas, a petroleum byproduct. The excess gas is fired off in a stack a short distance away. Because there is little natural gas here, it is not economical to market.

The major concern from environmentalists is of further human and industrial incursions into this delicate ecosystem. Collier Resources Company, proposed the construction of a landing strip and conduct seismic testing in the interest of building several new oil wells. In mid-2006, the Colliers withdrew their request for more oil drilling, as the amount of oil produced versus its costs were unprofitable. With offshore drilling becoming a local and national topic once more, drilling for oil in Big Cypress is likely “on hold” for now.

http://wikimapia.org/1079408/Raccoon-Point-Oil-Wells


56 posted on 08/29/2011 1:06:28 PM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: ilovesarah2012

Not just Raccoon Point.

Bear Island and Sunniland Field have each already produced 13 million barrels of oil and continue to produce today.

There is oil in the area.


57 posted on 08/29/2011 1:18:37 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: thackney

My neighbor who lives primarily in Florida now has changed is mind in favor of more drilling.

He had the classic fantasy of drilling rigs across the horizon. I showed him a photo of one that sat right across the lake from us and showed him that all that remains is a set of pipes with valves that poke up out of the weeds and are pretty much invisible. The rig was built and gone inside of a month.


58 posted on 08/29/2011 1:24:54 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: thackney

I don’t understand how they were ever allowed to drill in the Everglades. I am against drilling there. I grew up in So. Fla. and lived there until 1998 and I understand how important the Everglades are to drinking water. Bad idea. I know - NIMBY - but in this case, I think the vast majority would say NO!

In 2002, the federal government at the urging of President George W. Bush bought back oil and gas drilling rights in the Everglades for $120 million.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/feedarticle/9819733


59 posted on 08/29/2011 1:28:12 PM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: ilovesarah2012

This might surprise you, but people in Texas and Louisiana and all the other drilling states drink water too.

Drilling and production can be done safely. Spills do get cleaned up if/when they happen.


60 posted on 08/29/2011 1:33:56 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson