Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I could go on. Makes you wonder what part Huntsman had in this deal with China. Americans forced into a socialist nightmare. Drug companies cutting back on production of life-saving drugs, waiting for Obamacare to take effect. The Taxpayers will be paying higer prices for the very drugs they need to survive.

But the obvious question is, when an already broke nation can not afford this monster, who will decide which patients win the medication lottery? The Doctors-No The Death Panel-probably The Chinese- most definitely.

Reality can be very ugly.

1 posted on 08/29/2011 7:39:58 AM PDT by Marty62
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Marty62

There are several reasons for these ongoing shortages, Jensen said. Most are due to problems in manufacturing, ranging from contamination to late delivery of raw materials. Other problems include misprints in the drug’s label or packaging and increased demand, she said.

Some people believe the FDA is causing part of the problem by not quickly inspecting plants to allow them to start producing the drug again, but Jensen challenged that notion.

“If the company is having a quality issue, the company doesn’t have to wait for an FDA inspection to restart the manufacture,” Jensen explained. The agency attempts to work with the companies to get drugs back into the market or tries to locate other sources for these drugs, she added.

However, Jensen noted that since most of these drugs are generic, companies don’t make much money on them and may, in some cases, opt to discontinue them.

Joseph M. Hill, director of federal legislative affairs at the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, said that, “from our members’ perspective, it is kind of a crisis.”

“We are seeing a shortage of critical drugs in the areas of cancer therapy, pain medications, including anesthetics, and some nutritional products. Some of these are products that people cannot do without,” he said.

Another reason for the shortages, may be that companies are using them to increase prices, Dr. Otis Brawley, chief medical officer at the American Cancer Society, said.

“There is a pattern here. The drugs for which there is a shortage are the generic drugs, where the ability to make money is not as great,” he said. “If the drug is off the market, they can reprice it.”

While many of these delays are due to real manufacturing problems, “there are instances where I am certain that manufacture was stopped because they wanted to raise the price,” Brawley said.

http://news.yahoo.com/cancer-drug-shortages-getting-worse-fda-says-181011925.html

Maybe Obama will take over the pharmaceutical industry, too.


2 posted on 08/29/2011 7:45:15 AM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Marty62

Any time the government gets between a consumer and a producer, market chaos results....................


4 posted on 08/29/2011 7:51:57 AM PDT by Red Badger ("Treason doth never prosper.... What's the reason? Why if it prosper, none dare call it treason.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Marty62

It is not only “cancer” drugs.At any given time,we get memos at work ,stating that morphine,various anti-biotics etc..are in short supply.There was a recent problem with heparin .Seems to be happening more within the last 3 yrs or so.
Something’s up.


8 posted on 08/29/2011 7:55:40 AM PDT by peteyd (A dog may bite you in the ass,but it will never stab you in the back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Marty62

They’re hitting each and every industry at the various choke points.

They know how a capitalistic system works. And they are leaving no stone unturned in their broadbased attempts to undermine that system.

This is just one example. Yes, the consequences of these moves are serious. But when has bad outcomes ever stopped the left?
They’ll just blame it on whoever they feel like targeting at that particular moment.


9 posted on 08/29/2011 7:58:18 AM PDT by barstoolblues (Notes from the Hobbitt hole. By Hezbollah Hobbitt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Marty62
"Reality can be very ugly."

If there's a Ritalin shortage, there will be a completely new reality beyond ugly.

11 posted on 08/29/2011 7:59:46 AM PDT by CanaGuy (P.M. Steven Harper: We gave you a majority, now get busy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Marty62

Still doesn’t make a lot of sense. Some of these conditions they say are causing current shortages have existed for many years. Well, unless they can say that the shortages are of generics of drugs which only recently lost their patent protection and competition forced the prices too low.

More information is still needed, and where are our great, investigative journalists to get to the bottom of the problem. Maybe they just aren’t interested while Obama is in the WH.


20 posted on 08/29/2011 8:13:58 AM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Marty62
...Nuclear Medicine (lukemia etc) is having shortages of Isotopes due to the destruction of the Nuclear Industry...

Did I miss something? When was our nuclear industry destroyed?

34 posted on 08/29/2011 8:32:29 AM PDT by FReepaholic (I'm a lumberjack and I'm ok.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Marty62

Shortages only occur if markets aren’t free to produce, distribute and clear.


36 posted on 08/29/2011 8:37:00 AM PDT by NativeNewYorker (Freepin' Jew Boy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Marty62

It’s not just cancer drugs. I posted on other threads citing examples of other drugs we use routinely in the OR. The latest was this past Friday....we received notice of a national “backorder” of IV Pepcid.

I said before & I’ll say again: something strange is happening.

However, like a poster above pointed out, the MSM will not look into this. What they fail to realize is that they, too, may fall victim to this ‘rationing’


39 posted on 08/29/2011 8:46:07 AM PDT by surroundedbyblue (Live the message of Fatima - pray & do penance!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Marty62

Was doing some research on this topic, seems biggest issue is approximately 80% on the chemicals to manufacture the drugs are imported to this country and many sources shutdown due to ‘quality’ issues.


41 posted on 08/29/2011 8:49:40 AM PDT by Java4Jay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Marty62

This is no joke. My wife was supposed to start on Chemo treatment today, and they told us they did not have that kind ready, so they’re going to have her take some pill instead. I’m so upset. :(


44 posted on 08/29/2011 8:53:09 AM PDT by MNDude (so that's what they meant by Carter's second term)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Marty62

Death panels work in many ways....how screwed are us who are “senior citizens!”


45 posted on 08/29/2011 8:53:27 AM PDT by jennings2004 (Sarah Palin: "The bright light at the end of a very dark tunnel!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Marty62

Drug Shortage Crisis Grows
Posted By Tait Trussell On August 24, 2011 @ 12:05 am In Daily Mailer,FrontPage | No Comments

We face a crisis of drug shortages. Some hospital patients now have to take medications that aren’t effective. For others, treatment is dangerously delayed. Life-saving or life-prolonging medicines are increasingly in short supply for the one in ten Americans hospitalized on any particular day.

The Obama Administration is partly to blame. The crisis may worsen as the ObamaCare bureaucracy controls all aspects of health care in America.

A new survey released by the American Hospital Association (AHA) with responses from 820 facilities across the country reveals “serious consequences for patient care and access to vital therapies.”

With increasing frequency of drug shortages, the AHA survey revealed that “almost 100 percent of hospitals reported a shortage in the last six months and nearly half of the hospitals reported 21 or more drug shortages.”
Some hospitals were able to find alternative sources for drugs in short supply. But:

• Hospitals report they have delayed treatment (82 percent of the time) and more than half were not always able to give patients the prescribed treatment.
• Patients got a less effective drug (69 percent of the time).
• Hospitals experienced drug
shortages across all treatment categories.

• Most hospitals rarely or never received advance notification of drug shortages (77 percent) or were not informed about the cause of the shortage (67 percent).
• The majority of all hospitals reported increased drug costs resulting from the shortages.

• Most hospitals are being forced to buy more expensive alternative drugs from other sources.

“The number of drugs in short supply is increase at an alarming rate and hospitals are working diligently to reduce the impact on the patients they care for,” said AHA President and CEO Rich Umbdenstock.

The American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) conducted a survey as well, with the University of Michigan Health System. It found that labor costs and time needed to manage shortages are significant—estimated at an annual financial impact of $216 million nationally.

What has Obama to do with this disturbing health crisis? In his 2012 budget, Obama called for cutting the number of years drug makers could exclusively market brand-name biologic drugs to 7 years from 12 years. This means drug companies would have less time to profit from a new drug. So, they may not spend the $1 billion or more to make the drug.

Obama also wants to end “pay-for-delay” deals that affect traditional, “chemical” drugs by giving the Federal Trade Commission the power to block the deals. “Under such pacts,” as a story in Reuters explains, “brand-name and generic drug makers settle patent challenges with payoffs that delay lower-cost rivals from reaching the market.” Both brand and generic drug industries want to preserve the pay-to-delay settlements. Preserving the delays keeps the current manufacturers viable and continuing to supply needed drugs to the market on a regular basis.

Biologic medicines cost much more than ordinary drugs. They are much more expensive to manufacture. They also are proving to have better long-term outcomes with fewer side effects. Studies show “this leads to quicker recovery time and less additional treatment,” according to Consumer Health Information Corp. Obama and his co-conspirators at the Department of Health and Human Services (HEW) have been seeking–with the determination of a lion in a death chase after a zebra–to make all medicines generic because they are cheaper and could save money to spend elsewhere in the overly costly ObamaCare fiasco.

Biologic drugs—which Obama indirectly wants to restrict–are called the drugs of the future. They may be a vaccine, blood component, allergenic, somatic cell, gene therapy, tissue, recombinant therapeutic protein, or living cell used to treat diseases. Gene-based and cellular biologics are often at the forefront of medical research and can be used to treat a breadth of medical problems when no other treatments are available.

The Reuters article said HEW Secretary Sebelius “was unapologetic about the extra savings” to help cover other health costs. The two Administration proposals to get cheaper generics were said to save $11 billion over 10 years.

But there’s a sizeable catch: only about half of the brand-name drugs on the market today have a generic equivalent. Some drugs also are protected by patents and are supplied by only one company. So, Sebelius or anybody else will never be able to replace all brand medicines with generics.
An FDA press release on drug shortages said the agency “works with other firms who manufacture the drug, asking them to ramp up production if possible to prevent or mitigate a shortage. FDA encourages reporting shortages, and companies voluntarily provide shortage information. But they are not required to do so unless the drug manufacturer is the sole maker of a drug that’s “medically necessary.”
In the report of a meeting last year of the American Society of Health System Pharmacists, participants also touched on the ethical dilemma they face in having to prioritize use of any remaining stock of drugs involved in a shortage. Who gets

the desirable medication, and who gets what may be a less desirable alternative drug? The stress of making such decisions can be seen in the brutally honest and emotional responses from survey participants. As noted by one respondent, when a suitable alternative for a lifesaving drug is no longer available, “I guess patients just have to die.” Another respondent asked, “What do I tell our breast and lymphoma patients? You had a curable disease but not anymore because there is no drug available?”

The FDA announced Aug. 9 it was holding a meeting September 26 of industry and consumer groups to discuss reducing the drug shortage. The agency could expedite the approval process for new drugs, as has long been sought by pharmaceutical manufacturers.

But undoubtedly most effective would be a realistic posture by the Obama Administration that it not only can’t control all health problems, but also that it doesn’t even know such facts as: for some drugs there are no cost-effective generic versions.
________________________________________
Article printed from FrontPage Magazine: http://frontpagemag.com
URL to article: http://frontpagemag.com/2011/08/24/drug-shortage-crisis-grows-2/


50 posted on 08/29/2011 9:05:19 AM PDT by RaceBannon (Ron Paul is to the Constitution what Fred Phelps is to the Bible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Marty62

We are paying drastically higher drug prices right now. The price of drugs, generic and prescription, are skyrocketing.


58 posted on 08/29/2011 9:25:15 AM PDT by Citizen Tom Paine (An old sailor sends)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Marty62

What I have noticed is a whole raft of articles in the mainstream media (including in some particularly lefty publications) stating that this or that test which was always thought to be important, or this or that treatment which was formerly thought to be necessary, has upon further review been found it ain’t necessarily so.

Put them all together and it appears to be a drumbeat.
It tells me they are in the process of conditioning the American people to expect a whole lot less health care under Obamacare.


66 posted on 08/29/2011 10:05:18 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson