Posted on 08/27/2011 2:15:46 PM PDT by Sen Jack S. Fogbound
No one with any sanity will take credit for it. It’s crap that’s been debunked for about a year.
If the information about what's her name was false and admitted so by conservative publications then I wonder about the true purpose of this.
Perhaps you’re right in labeling it “Chat” or whatever instead of “news”.
I do not know if it is true and that’s why I made the vanity to get the other freepers to verify it.
I am bothered by it being “unknown” since I don’t know who is the source. A friend emailed it to me but no source cited.
I really don’t believe it unitl I know the source so it was in hope perhaps the freeper or freepers could point me in the right direction. I do not mormally fan out such stories until I can check it out.
“Kagan never filed anything with SCOTUS in any of the eligibility cases. She is listed on the docket because, when anyone sues the President in the Supreme Court, the Solicitor General is the one served with the papers. But Obama never responded to any of the SCOTUS filings in any of the eligibility cases (the Government often doesn't respond to SCOTUS filings that they think have no chance of being granted); the Court denied all of the requested stays, and denied certiorari in all of the cases, without receiving any response from Kagan on behalf of Obama.”
Is there any source other than Fox?
Today, I had a lefty whine that he is tired of hearing about how George Soros is satan, while Dick Cheney is obviously the evil one.
I strongly correct him, although it is like preaching to a dumb chicken.
A bit Greek to me. What’s a “docket file”? A description of the case? Wouldn’t all the judges get a copy of the exact same thing?
Snopes has always been for fools.
This has been posted here before with the “unknowns” known.
>> What’s a “docket file”? <<
.
The server entry on the case that contains every event, or action in the case in chronological order, date and time, and listing who was present for each entry.
I agree that Obama and Roberts colluded on the botched swearing in, but for what purpose(s). They could have just as officially made the correction in public and by using the bible. I always have in my mind the photo of Obama in Robert’s chambers acting like the SC was his ,Roberts up front with others appearing a bit tentative. There have been stories about Roberts having sizable investments worth a lot of money’ In any case I believe some day by some way all SC justices will be facing the judgement of Providence and the patriots of this Nation for lack of judicial and patriotic integrity.
If they did it in public, and they knew he was ineligible, that would amount to treason.
When was the last prosecution for treason? It seems to be one of those concepts that went out of fashion ages ago, like those dead white slave-owning racists who founded our nation. I mean, aren’t we all just enlightened citizens of the world now, with no time for such antiquated ideas as “constitutionality”?
/sarc
Congress did not do their job when they confirmed Kagan.
But they rarely do meet their constitutional responsibilities.
Old news to me...this was one of the major reasons Kagan had to be stopped but the GOP blew it.
We were screaming to high heaven about the conflict...
“I’ve never trusted Snopes.”
Me too. When they said that Barbara Wise’s death was perfectly ‘normal’ (you can look up her name - she knew a lot about Vince Foster and just happen to drop dead in her DC office), that was it for Snopes as far as anything related to politics. I still use them once in a while regarding non-political stuff (like verifying that those Nigerian E-Mails are not real...LOL).
bfl
For later
Snopes claims that the story about the early radio star Uncle Don Carney is an urban legend and my father told me he heard it as it happened. Who do you think I'd tend to believe??
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.