Baloney. Modern “science”, whether it’s global warming or evolution, is a laughingstock of preconceived notions driving the whoring of dollars in the brothels of big science.
Fishtank, PhD in engineering
fishtank: "Baloney. Modern “science”, whether it’s global warming or evolution, is a laughingstock of preconceived notions driving the whoring of dollars in the brothels of big science.
Fishtank, PhD in engineering"
I'll grant you that "anthropogenic global warming" is a case in point -- an unholy alliance of corruptible scientists and wholly corrupt politicians.
But evolution theory is a different matter, for one: since its genesis goes back to times before government grants played a major role in scientific "research".
For another: evolution theory is based on the confirmed observations of evolution fact, namely descent with modifications and natural selection.
So evolution theory merely extends evolution facts backwards in time -- millions and billions of years -- to hypothesize that all (or nearly all) life on earth descended from common ancestors.
Confirmations of the evolution hypothesis -- making it a theory -- come from the fossil record, from DNA analysis and through inputs from nearly every other branch of science.
On the other hand, scientifically recognized evidence disputing, much less disproving, evolution is nonexistent.
Nor is there a scientifically recognized alternate theory to evolution.
Indeed, as these many threads amply demonstrate, the "alternate theory" most often proposed is not scientifically based at all, but rather descends directly, without much "evolution", from the Bible.
So your argument has to be that scientist -- all of them -- are corrupted to the core by Big Government, which wants to take over the role of God, and therefore, you say, the Bible should be considered more scientific than science.
I'd call that a logical stretch which does not bear scrutiny.