I am thrilled that Perry is losing too. I can’t wait for Sarah to announce. People will be saying, “Perry who?”
great then Obama will be up by 20
Rasmussen had Palin losing 33% to 50% against Obama on Aug 22. The GOP can nominate Palin, but it can't make the American electorate vote for her.
You mean, Sarah Palin? The one losing the worst of all, 50/33? That Sarah?
November 2012.
Many FReepers stated they ‘are thrilled that B.Obama beat Perry. Even though they would have supported Sarah Palin had she decided to run’.
Well isn’t that special.
---------------------------------------------------
Maybe you missed this part;
"Data released earlier shows the President leading Congressman Ron Paul by a single point and former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin by double digits."
*** I am thrilled that Perry is losing too. I can’t wait for Sarah to announce. People will be saying, “Perry who?” ***
I have not talked to a single soul who isn’t a solid Republican who has said they would vote for Palin.
In 2004, I was disgusted with Bush, but couldn’t possibly vote for Kerry. In 2012, if Palin is the nominee, you’ll get that effect in reverse for Obama.
The fact that many people don’t know who Perry is, yet he is polling this well is telling. OTOH everyone knows who SP is and she keeps getting beat handily in these polls. I think SP would be the better president, but it’s getting harder to see her winning the election.
I'm a Palin supporter. I remain ambivalent about Rick Perry until I've see him face some fair but tough interviews and learn more about him than I know, today. However, if Sarah Palin doesn't run or does and is defeated in the primaries by Perry, I'll vote for the Republican candidate. The recent polls show Sarah Palin at a low point with supposed Republican voters but like many conservatives, I've grown highly skeptical of polls because they can be so easily skewed and often are wrong. There are always a ton of variables to contend with when looking at the possible outcome of the (GOP) primary elections that are 5 months off. Even if the polls were favorable to Palin, I would be (a) happier but, (b) just as skeptical.
Like many FReepers, I believe that America cannot afford another four years of Obama. In fact, the thought of a second-term Obama with no concerns about re-election really frightens me. America needs bold, decisive leadership to extricate us from the ravages of Obama's socialist experiment. A RINO like Romeney is about as far from that as you can get so I welcome his fall in popularity - if it holds. I also hope that Sarah Palin decides not to be scared off by polls and establishment Republicans nattering that she's 'too conservative to be elected'. Palin, via personal appearances and well-done TV ads can overcome the MSM's attempts to 'demonize' her and make her unpopular for really no reason except the fact that she's a conservative Christian that loves her family and her country. She'll do it with personal appeal (like Reagan) and common sense, logical plans for turning around the U.S. economy, if she's elected. Sarah Palin carries that ineffable quality of charisma which can do a lot to offset the medias relentless attempts to marginalize her as a political force. However, Palin is a political force and if she runs, she can win. She'll certainly have my vote. Now, if only Scott Rasmussen would call me.
You shouldn’t be, Perry is the only one that has a chance to beat Obama. While I like Sarah too, she has been rendered unelectable by the media. Bachmann also.
If you think Sarah is going to be universally accepted in a head to head against Zero, I don’t think so. She will have to reintroduce herself and overcome her negatives with enough voters beyond we conservatives. It’s no slam dunk. Once a candidate is chosen, most voters will judge when they go head to head in the first debate. Until then, it’s probably useless to speculate.
So you two are more thrilled with Romney and Perry losing than 0bama winning?
Nice tactics.
Ah huh. Doubt it.
“I am thrilled that Perry is losing too. “
Nose. Cut. Spite. Face.