Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/23/2011 4:48:25 PM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: Kaslin

31 posted on 08/24/2011 10:02:41 AM PDT by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
I hate to say this, but Biden was right.

When Chairman Mao took power in the late 04s, he was warned by Chinese scholars that China was in danger of being overpopulated if it kept on it's current growth trend. They were growing faster than their infrastructure or their ability to grow food. Their numbers were quite compelling and he actually started off his reign with fairly strict measures to encourage low birth rates.

Later in the 1950s, he believed that the USSR and the West were going to engage in an atomic war, and likely wipe each other out. He also concluded that if China was populous enough, it would survive any war by numbers alone, and would be able to resettle the remaining world after the dust settled.

Because of this, he pushed off a major propaganda campaign, calling for huge families as necessary and patriotic. This lead to the skyrocketing population increase that Chinese scholars were terrified of.

Sure enough, after Mao's death, the numbers were pretty bleak. China was heading towards mass starvation, inescapable poverty and social collapse. There just weren't enough resources in the country to support a culture where families just kept having kids until they has a boy or two. They had to do something to stabilize the numbers, and they did.

While there is some instances of sterilization and forced abortion, as a percentage that's extremely rare. The actual mechanism for enforcing the 1 child policy is social pressure and a hefty tax on any children over the first.

I spent some time in China, back when I was in the Army, and I spoke to a number of people about this. They uniformly don't like the 1 child policy, but also concede that Mao's policies had left no choice. It was either 1 child or starve.

32 posted on 08/24/2011 10:15:16 AM PDT by Steel Wolf ("Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master." - Gaius Sallustius Crispus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
"Your policy has been one which I fully understand — I'm not second-guessing — of one child per family. The result being that you're in a position where one wage earner will be taking care of four retired people. Not sustainable," Biden opined, embracing entitlement reform, Beijing-style.

Whereas our policy, on the other hand, it to seize the healthcare industry and then ration it by age, so that "wage earners" don't have to support as many retired people.

33 posted on 08/27/2011 3:05:22 PM PDT by the invisib1e hand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
WH: Biden finds China one-child policy 'repugnant'
34 posted on 08/31/2011 8:25:47 PM PDT by Coleus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

CINO Biden once again proves he does not read or follow the Bible!


35 posted on 08/31/2011 8:34:30 PM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson