Posted on 08/23/2011 4:40:34 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
If it were a one off poll, I'd agree with you. But is every single one wrong, and what information are you privy to that brings you to this conclusion:
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/president_obama_vs_republican_candidates.html
If the internal polls showed Gov. Palin losing against Mr. Obama, they’d ignore her instead of attacking her, FRiend. Since they continue going after her, I know that the polls they show the sheeple are bull. I’ve worked on presidential campaigns (I lived in Iowa from 1974 to 2002, except for my service time) and I know quite a bit about Iowa and national politics. Google shows about 92,000,000 results (0.13 seconds) for “Palin” so they’re not ignoring her, are they?
And I'm not talking about internal polls, I'm talking about all of the public polls averaged together show her coming in behind Romney, Perry, Bachmann, Paul, Cain, and even Gingrich and Huntsman when matched against Obama. I think it's a reasonable question. Why, despite 100% name recognition is this the case?
I know she's not a declared candidate and the rest are, but I don't think that explains the discrepancy.
I'm still perplexed that you think that being an average of 16 points down is a miracle.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.