Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TexMom7
"He was referring to Nafta Trade when he referred to that vision."

That's not bad enough?

In exchange for importing Ford trucks (and thousands of other manufactured goods...from workers paid $4/hr) we get duty-free tomatoes in December and green onions that give you the sh!ts.

The US does not benefit from NAFTA in any way.

Yes, there are BUSINESSES that benefit...and while lucrative, the balance is way out of whack.

The USA does not benefit from NAFTA. It's a net negative.

40 posted on 08/21/2011 5:45:37 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: Mariner

I agree.

But Perry is not responsible for Nafta. He did however have to comply with it because it had already been signed.

You can thank Bill Clinton and George H. W. Bush (Bush 1)for that one.


42 posted on 08/21/2011 6:15:18 PM PDT by TexMom7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

To: Mariner

NAFTA is a bad deal for the U.S. Honda just announced that it is building a major plant there. Honda’s U.S. plants are non-union and have had no labor problems.

Perry has been a strong supporter of NAFTA. Watch for this to be the next issue he flips on.


44 posted on 08/21/2011 6:25:09 PM PDT by bwc2221
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson