In Post 557 You stated: First, I refused to post stats, not a link.
That was a lie. You were asked to prove a statement that you made. You were asked in Post 221: Post statistics backing your assertion with a link.
You refused. And you continued to refuse to post a link.
Your replies were listed by AndyJackson in Post 561
So, let's review.
You say I refused to post stats. I told people to look it up online. I never changed that stance.
You were also asked for a link. You refused. As stated in Post 561 you continued to refuse to post a link.
You are now backpedaling. Won't work.
You wrote:
“In Post 557 You stated: First, I refused to post stats, not a link. That was a lie.”
No, lib liar, that was not a lie. Did I ever post any stats? First, I was asked to post STATS and link to back up the STATS. I posted NOTHING that was asked for and will continue to post nothing that is asked for in that regard. You’re getting desperate.
“You were asked to prove a statement that you made. You were asked in Post 221: Post statistics backing your assertion with a link.”
Yes, STATS and a link to the STATS. I posted neither stats nor any link.
“You refused. And you continued to refuse to post a link.”
False. I REFUSE to give you ANYTHING in that regard: no stats, no link, etc.
“Your replies were listed by AndyJackson in Post 561”
Yes, and he was completely wrong: I NEVER ONCE made any cite of any kind in regard to what was asked of me. And I will continue to provide absolutely none in that regard.
“You are now backpedaling. Won’t work.”
Lib, I never once gave any cite, any link, nor any stat. That’s not backpeddling. Are you sure you know what backpeddling means? Seriously, how can you admit I have never given you ANYTHING you wanted, and yet say I am backpeddling? Do you even see the obvious contradiction in your own claim there? No, you probably don’t.