Actually there isn't because with few exception proper research in the scienices and social sciences is published in copyrighted peer reviewed journals for which you or your organization have to pay a subscription fee - You do know that don't you?
Therefore, actual credible original source data is not generally available by Googling it. And that is what I mean by proof, not your self-referential pseudo science.
And yes, my dear Vlad, in any debate the onus is on you to back up your assertion with data.
You wrote:
“Actually there isn’t because with few exception proper research in the scienices and social sciences is published in copyrighted peer reviewed journals for which you or your organization have to pay a subscription fee - You do know that don’t you?”
Actually, it’s online. The fact that it was originally published in peer reviewed articles does not stop it from going online. It’s the 21st century. You do know that don’t you?
“Therefore, actual credible original source data is not generally available by Googling it.”
It’s online. Google.
“And that is what I mean by proof, not your self-referential pseudo science.”
It’s online. Google.
“And yes, my dear Vlad, in any debate the onus is on you to back up your assertion with data.”
There is no debate here. No amount of evidence would ever convince you. You refuse to even do the least bit of looking. No debate is possible. This was obvious from the start.