Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Message from Russ [Feingold to not run in 2012 (D-WI)]
http://www.progressivesunited.org ^ | 08-19-2011 | Russ Feingold

Posted on 08/19/2011 6:41:21 AM PDT by Red Badger

I am grateful for the friendship and support of so many fellow Wisconsinites who suggested I consider running for statewide office in the coming months. While I may seek elective office again someday, I have decided not to run for public office during 2012.

This was a difficult decision, as I thoroughly enjoyed my tenure in both the State Senate and the U.S. Senate, and I know that progressives are eager to reverse some of the outrageous policies being pursued by corporate interests at both the state and federal levels. I am also well aware that I have a very strong standing in the polls should I choose to run again for the U.S. Senate or in a recall election for governor. After twenty-eight continuous years as an elected official, however, I have found the past eight months to be an opportunity to look at things from a different perspective.

Teaching law during the spring semester at Marquette University Law School was a joy. The Marquette Law School is a thriving academic institution situated in a beautiful new building, Eckstein Hall. I found my time with the dean, staff, faculty, and especially the students at Marquette to be a terrific first experience in teaching law. I am pleased that I have been asked to return to teach full-time this fall and look forward to doing so.

Another different experience for me has been writing a book to be published by Crown Publishing/Random House next February. I am working hard to finish it. It's about how we have too often lost our way as a nation in responding to the 9/11 attacks and related issues. Entitled "While America Sleeps," writing it has given me a chance to put down in a sustained way some of my concerns at a time when too many political operatives in the nation try to shift the political discourse away from the fundamental national security and international issues that will determine our futures and those of our children and grandchildren. I intend to make appearances in 2012 in Wisconsin and around the country to discuss this topic.

The one thing many of us did not anticipate at the outset of this year was the extreme assault on the working families of Wisconsin in particular and the nation as a whole. I was happy with some of the results of this year's Wisconsin state senate recall elections, and was glad to be able to play a small role in supporting all of the Democratic candidates.

When I said on election night last year that it "was on to 2012," I meant it. As I said those words I was especially thinking of the need to re-elect President Obama. I will be working to re-elect him and hope to play a significant role in that effort. But since the aggressive tactics of Governor Walker and the legislature ensued, those words now also mean retaking the state government from these corporate-backed operatives is a special priority. The entire political climate is more infected by the domination of very wealthy individual and corporate interests than perhaps at any time in our nation's history. That is why I founded Progressives United, an organization devoted not only to overturning the Citizens United decision but to challenging those involved in the political process who, for short-term political gain, are willing to seek and accept unlimited corporate contributions. This practice should be strongly opposed regardless of party and regardless of whether I otherwise support these candidates. In many ways, this is the overriding political struggle of our time. It is more important than whether or when one person runs for office again. That is why, at this time, I am devoting my primary political energy to this cause and this organization.

Political figures often cite wanting to spend time with their loved ones as a reason for not seeking public office when they haven't a prayer of winning anyway. In my case, I don't need an excuse and will simply say that the time with family, friends, and loved ones in the past few months have been among the best in my life, and I am not eager to give that up. Let me say again, however, that being your representative was the greatest honor of my life, a fulfillment of a dream. You never let me down. But for now I am thoroughly enjoying the life of a private citizen in this great state of Wisconsin.


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: buhbye; sourcetitlenoturl
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
Good..............
1 posted on 08/19/2011 6:41:28 AM PDT by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

In other words, he figures that getting elected to the senate again would not be easy or certain.


2 posted on 08/19/2011 6:42:55 AM PDT by Redleg Duke ("Madison, Wisconsin is 30 square miles surrounded by reality.", L. S. Dryfus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redleg Duke

It’s probably easy and certain.

Just not favourable, for him.


3 posted on 08/19/2011 6:44:22 AM PDT by Jonty30
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Yawn...


4 posted on 08/19/2011 6:46:18 AM PDT by darkwing104 (Lets get dangerous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Looks like he doesn’t want to spend money campaigning and then have a high probability of losing. The WI unions have spent money at a deficit on the recall elections and the Judge Prosser election, and that leaves them very lean going into 2012.


5 posted on 08/19/2011 6:47:57 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (When you've only heard lies your entire life, the truth sounds insane.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625

The union money has one arrow left in the quiver - try to turn at least one member of the Wisconsin state senate from a nominal “R” to a practicing “D”.

But this leaves little latitude for a person now out of office to be able to worm the way back in.


6 posted on 08/19/2011 6:58:01 AM PDT by alloysteel (Are Democrats truly "better angels"? They are lousy stewards for America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

The bench behind Russ is weak weak weak. Tammy Baldwin with a C communist instead of a D behind her name.


7 posted on 08/19/2011 7:03:57 AM PDT by sgtyork (The secret of happiness is freedom, and the secret of freedom, courage. Thucydides)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redleg Duke

And IF he won, a BIG “if” he’d be in the MINORITY


8 posted on 08/19/2011 7:10:53 AM PDT by ken5050 (Should Christie RUN in 2012? NO!!! But he should WALK 3 miles every day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Redleg Duke

Running on the ticket with Baraq “food stamp” Obama in Nov 2012 will be a lot of “fun” for Dems, heh heh heh.


9 posted on 08/19/2011 7:14:19 AM PDT by nascarnation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Redleg Duke; fieldmarshaldj; AuH2ORepublican
In other words, he figures that getting elected to the senate again would not be easy or certain.

In other words, he's running for president in 2016. Starting his own PAC, traveling around the country, setting himself up as an outsider...

10 posted on 08/19/2011 7:33:23 AM PDT by Crichton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel
The union money has one arrow left in the quiver - try to turn at least one member of the Wisconsin state senate from a nominal “R” to a practicing “D”.

That would leave the House and Governorship in the hands of Repubs, and a conservative supreme court. A Dem controlled senate could block any further Repub initiatives, but could not get any Dem initiative passed. The result would be gridlock until after the 2012 elections. Meanwhile, the unions would continue to bleed money.

11 posted on 08/19/2011 7:42:10 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (When you've only heard lies your entire life, the truth sounds insane.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Redleg Duke

Russ sees the tsunami coming.


12 posted on 08/19/2011 8:01:25 AM PDT by DOGEY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

I wonder if the liqour sales at the Sport Bowl in Middleton will go up with Russ staying in town. Or maybe he goes to the Outback instead because it is more of a yuppie place.


13 posted on 08/19/2011 8:12:34 AM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Would you like to be a democrat candidate for senate trying to convince people to send you to Washington to continue the “good work and successful policies of the Obama administration”? Nuff said.


14 posted on 08/19/2011 8:58:38 AM PDT by festusbanjo (Watch out for Brother Love's Traveling Excuse Making Show and the Short Bus of Hope!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crichton

BINGO.


15 posted on 08/19/2011 9:13:31 AM PDT by reformedliberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel

Word is that the State Senator you are likely referencing, Dale Schultz, is also not running after this term.


16 posted on 08/19/2011 9:17:32 AM PDT by reformedliberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Crichton; Redleg Duke; fieldmarshaldj

Feingold was itching to run for president in 2008, and could be thinking of making a run. But if he was thinking of 2016, wouldn’t he want to have a gubernatorial victory or two under his belt first? Maybe he’s thinking of challenging Obama next year—he could run to Obama’s left while still being viewed by moderate Dems as someone “electable.”


17 posted on 08/19/2011 11:32:11 AM PDT by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll protect your rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Redleg Duke; Diana in Wisconsin; afraidfortherepublic; Indy Pendance; Brown Deer

Very bad news for the dems. They had their hopes pinned on Feingold either running for Kohl’s senate seat or running against Walker in a recall.


18 posted on 08/19/2011 12:54:11 PM PDT by Jean S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Bet he runs for something in 2014


19 posted on 08/19/2011 12:54:38 PM PDT by MNJohnnie (Giving politicians more tax money is like giving addicts free drugs to cure their addiction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AuH2ORepublican
Feingold was itching to run for president in 2008, and could be thinking of making a run. But if he was thinking of 2016, wouldn’t he want to have a gubernatorial victory or two under his belt first?

No ... governing is messy, especially with a GOP legislature, and there's a good chance he'd be proven either impotent or be forced to compromise his radical socialist beliefs. Running would also be chancy - if he lost to Walker, he'd be done.

Democrats don't really care if their nominee has governing experience. Their primary electorate is really looney tunes now.

20 posted on 08/19/2011 1:19:56 PM PDT by Crichton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson