Posted on 08/18/2011 7:21:25 PM PDT by Zionist Conspirator
Ping.
If whats hiz name can scrap NASA and violate the 1st Amendment, why can’t we have a Jivaro Headhunter outreach program?
Aug 4, 2011
New Jersey Republican Gov. Chris Christie defended his decision to nominate a Muslim judge to the state Superior Court against conservative critics who warned that the new judge will implement Sharia law. The notoriously blunt-spoken Christie calling their fears crap and crazy.
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/chris-christie-slams-fearmongering-over-sharia-law-210648303.html
The Saudis are sure spending plenty of money to establish colonies here building mosques in rural areas. The prohibition on STATE funding of establishment of theocratic rule in the country does not JUST prohibit THIS country from doing it TO this country.
Of course, because Abe Foxman is a Muslim-coddler, that means that the Jewish religion is one of coddling Muslims, right? I mean, that’s the kind of logic you constantly use to attack Catholics on every Catholic thread you find.
Fortunately, I can recognize that Abe Foxman is a clueless idiot who doesn’t speak for Judaism, but just a pathetic band of idiot leftists who happen to be Jewishand so deign to speak for Jews.
This is a simple question of demographics. As their numbers increase, they will begin to form their subcultures (outside the main stream culture) and exist in parallel. As their numbers continue to rise, they will influence policy makers and the markets. Finally as they approach 1/3 of the over all population they begin to make demands and essentially take over from within. Highly orgnaized, militant, a common vision/cause makes them more influential. Bottom line: In the Muslim world, "Islam" is the mechanism of societal organization and the Westerner when looking at these nations or culture looks at them with secular eyes as this author does.
Bosnia
Parts of India where their population is exploding (pun intended)
etc
etc
etc
Even in Israel, Denmark and the Netherlands we see the same trends. With Islam it's just a game with numbers.
Abe Foxman is an idiot who’d love to play the role of Max in the Sound of Music. But I’m not sure I can agree with critics of Christie for this. Even during the Spanish Inquisition, Muslims held high positions in Spanish society, such as judges, professors, and high ranking royal officials. (Contary to legend, The Inquisition only targeted people who claimed to be Christian.) The judge has sworn an oath to uphold the laws of America. I’m familar with Taqqiya, but I’d say judge him on his rulings and conduct. His clients *were* found innocent, and the accused deserve adequate legal counsel.
Or have I missed something? Is there something these articles have failed to explain? Has this guy ever expressed support for medieval Shariah law? Has he ruled like a leftist, activist?
Abe Foxman is an idiot who’d love to play the role of Max in the Sound of Music. But I’m not sure I can agree with critics of Christie for this. Even during the Spanish Inquisition, Muslims held high positions in Spanish society, such as judges, professors, and high ranking royal officials. (Contary to legend, The Inquisition only targeted people who claimed to be Christian.) The judge has sworn an oath to uphold the laws of America. I’m familar with Taqqiya, but I’d say judge him on his rulings and conduct. His clients *were* found innocent, and the accused deserve adequate legal counsel.
Or have I missed something? Is there something these articles have failed to explain? Has this guy ever expressed support for medieval Shariah law? Has he ruled like a leftist, activist?
"Every Catholic thread I find" almost always seems to have a post by a Catholic making a crack about young earth creationism, a "G-d-breathed Bible" (a quotation from your St. Paul, btw), "bobble toters," snake-handlers, and "know-nothings" (language remarkably similar to that used by Foxman's ADL, btw).
I will never cease to wonder why some Catholics insist on pretending that my criticisms of that religion have no basis in reality when the Catholics on this very forum wear their evolutionism and higher criticism on their sleeves--not to mention just about every Catholic book and periodical of the modern era.
This appears to be the opinion of a student at BYU.
At first I thought that it was a book by some Islamist (political Islam, Sharia law advocate) nut.
I believe though that Islamists will (have?) proclaimed Islam and Sharia law to be the foundation of everything so Mr. Foxman should consider talking to two Islamists and get back to us in the morning.
What do you make of this? The author has written extensively about Islam. The “Gates of Vienna” is referenced by the Oslo murderer in his long paper.
But if the article about what is going on at Lackland AFB is true, this is newsworthy.
“Lackland AFB Prepares for the Mahdi”
http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/2011/08/lackland-afb-prepares-for-mahdi.html
—
Would like your opinion.
Thanks for wasting three minutes of my time. That had ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with my question.
(OK, Not a complete waste of time... anytime I listen to West is somewhat enjoyable.)
Oh, pleeeease.
More like someone will (in about 200 cases, me) make some comment which doesn’t agree with your exegesis, which will launch you on a tirade along the lines of “first you hold this opinion, and next thing you know you’re accepting evolution and condoning gay marriage.”
By “all the Earth,” does Genesis mean Mt Everest was covered? Maybe not? You ‘re an evolutionist!
Did Moses write Deuteronomy in his own hand? What’s that, you say? It was a redaction written after Moses? You’re evolutionist!
Was the first day 24 hours? Of course it was, you evolutionist!
Was the book of Daniel complete and in its current form by the time of the return from Babylonian exile? Of course, you evolutionist!
You even called me an evolutionist because I wrote that the Masoretic text was standardized after the publication of the Dead Sea Scrolls.
Little wonder why you call Benedict XVI and John Paul II evolutionists despite EXTENSIVE writings, including dogmatic encyclicals, describing Adam and Eve as literal, historical figures.
(For any lurkers, I happen to believe that the universe legitimately appears old, but it was created in the state of looking old, just like Adam was created as an adult, and not as a newborn baby or zygote.)
The Department of Homeland Security has been trying for some time to deport Qatanani for lying on his 1999 immigration paperwork. Hed been granted a religious-worker visa in 1996, enabling him to be the imam at the Islamic Center. When it expired in 1999, he sought to become a permanent U.S. resident. Though specifically asked about his criminal history, Qatanani failed to disclose that he was convicted in an Israeli military court for his membership in, and support of, Hamas. Mohammeds firm helped Qatanani prepare the I-485, and Qatanani later claimed that hed signed the form because he trusted his attorney, Sohail Mohammed. (See Homeland Security Investigation, Appendix, p. 4.)
The deportation case against Qatanani was heard by an immigration judge in 2008. Christie was then the Bush-appointed U.S. attorney for New Jersey, though his office did not handle the case. In light of Qatananis track record and the Islamic Center of Passaic Countys connections to the Bush Justice Departments then-ongoing HLF prosecution, it is nothing short of shocking that U.S. attorney Christie went to Qatananis mosque for a Ramadan celebration while the immigration case was underway. There, he is reported to have embraced Qatanani and praised the former Hamas operative as a man of great good will.
More astoundingly, Christie permitted one of his assistant U.S. attorneys, Charles B. McKenna, to testify at the immigration hearing as a character witness on behalf of Qatanani i.e., a Justice Department official was dispatched to undermine the Homeland Security Departments case against Qatanani, which was built in part on an investigation conducted by the FBI, an agency of the Justice Department.
The immigration judge, Alberto Riefkohl, ultimately ruled in Qatananis favor, an absurd decision in which he baselessly discredited two federal agents whod testified about Qatananis admission that hed been arrested for Hamas activities, and irrationally discounted the evidence of Qatananis Israeli conviction. The judge stressed, in arriving at this ruling, how impressed hed been by law-enforcement officers that took time from their respective duties to appear before the court. Im sure. But the feel-good hallucinations of bridge-building cant erase the reality of terror promotion. Judge Riefkohl was later reversed by the Board of Immigration Appeals, which found that there was no basis for Riefkohl to have ignored the governments evidence.
The questions about Governor Christies appointment of Sohail Mohammed and his exertions on behalf of Mohammeds client, Mohammed Qatanani, have nothing to do with either sharia or the all-purpose smear of Islamophobia. They are about the governors judgment. They are about a U.S. attorney with political ambitions pandering to a politically active constituency at the expense of national security and enforcement of the immigration laws. They are about his decision to award a state judgeship to an attorney who was an active and vocal board member of a very troubling Islamist organization and who has a penchant for presuming that perfectly valid anti-terror prosecutions are, instead, anti-Muslim persecutions.
Contrary to Abe Foxman's ignorant or delusional assertion, Sharia has already come to American courts. In August 2010, Judge Joseph Charles cited Shariah in refusing to grant a woman a restraining order after a divorce. And we all know that Foxman is not too lazy or ignorant to do a simple websearch for "shariah in american courts" . Had he bothered to do so, he would find multiple other instances of US courts citing Shariah. Since Foxman refutes none of these and simply writes "not necessary" and "racism", it is clear that he doesn't care about the facts. What I don't don't understand is why "The Jewish Press" would run such silly propoganda? Are you giving Foxman rope to hang his position with his own arrogance and foolishness? Or are you joining his crusade to keep the Jewish community docile until New York becomes like Malmo, Sweden?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.