Did you even read her column before posting your spam? Spam hardly serves as a rebuttal to her well supported charges of trampling the deliberative process , human shield demagoguery and cronyism.
Spam convinces no one. Most people don;’t read it. Why do you post it?
You're right. I ignore the pro-Perry spam just as I would ignore the same were it favoring Romney.
I lived through this in Texas having a daughter this age whose mother had cervical cancer. I was concerned as a Conservative Texan about Perry's actions about the new-ness of the drug and the fear that my daughter may take it as tacit permission to engage in sexual promiscuity because I gave her a drug to protect her while doing it.
But what I found is that I believe that Perry's heart was in the right place, he got spanked for it and learned from it.
I suppose it all comes down to your definition of “spam.” Spam has a “canned” quality. (And it’s not “spam” because you don’t like the message it delivers.) That was a well-written comprehensive piece of work.
Not spam.
I don’t find txroadkill’s post any less informative than your post.
Your charge that it’s “spam” is ludicrous**. You’re entitled to your opinion, but that browbeating crap when someone disagrees with you is over the top.
** However, if you prefer, call the txroadkill post “spam”, then admit your OP is “spam” as well. Fair is fair.
He's Texan.
So is Perry.
So Perry must, Must, MUST be the only choice! Don't you see?
Cheers!