[dila813]

Yea, but damages?

I don’t think you can claim not wining an election damages because she may not have won regardless.

Don’t get me wrong, I think there should be a law that if someone lies or there is fraud, the responsible person should have to pay 50% of everything the candidate spent during the election, regardless whether they win or loose.

[Rumplemeyer]

what will be telling is what Soros will refuse to produce in discovery, this action opens his whole organization up to public display, who does business with, imagine the names...

[Sea Parrot]

Judge just gave the OK for a failed dem candidate to sue a conservative group, for an ad they never ran. But the LSM picked it up and ran with it as news. He claims it hurt his campaign and is seeking damages.

[Longbow1969]

I don’t think you can claim not wining an election damages because she may not have won regardless.

LOL. Christine O' Donnell was not going to win that Senate seat even if she had suddenly discovered the cure for cancer and miracles followed her wherever she went. The woman is a flake, has too much personal baggage, had already ditched the GOP to run a 3rd party bid when she lost a Senate primary in 2006, and is otherwise completely unacceptable as a statewide candidate to the public in Delaware.

As to her lawsuit, she also sued a conservative group for 6.9 million claiming mental anguish, so I wouldn't trust O'Donnell any further than I could throw her. Still, since I do hate CREW and detest Soros I will give COD the benefit of the doubt and wish her the best of luck.

And if she stormed of Piers Morgan show it is just going to make her look more petty and ridiculous than she already does. She should have known exactly what she was getting into appearing on such a program and been ready to deal with it.