Your basic premise is right, that Obama is setting America up for a situation that is very similar to Manson’s Helter Skelter. I made the same statement before Obama was elected after reading the article from American Thinker, Barack Obama and the Strategy of Manufactured Crisis.
Where you seemed to go off track was not pointing out that it is the people who are pointing at conservatives as racists and obstructionists to the concepts of restorative justice and equality of outcome and the very people who were the worst racists and did the most damage to race relations.
Race relations are not going to improve under liberalism because forced egalitarianism is like legislating morality. You cannot regulate thought by police action, and restorative justice simply compounds the problem. Liberalism doesn’t really attempt to heal race relations, anyway.
You are correct.
Those who follow the liberal mantra, especially those who work to advance it, do the exact opposite.
They need people in apposing groups, so they can set them against each other when the time is needed depending upon the agenda of the day.
Divide and conquer is how they advance their agenda’s, and that ultimately will be their downfall, because eventually one group will become stronger and not back down when they are expected to.
Then the liberal propagandists will become an obstacle themselves. So instead of a utopian society, the people end up being subjected to an authoritarian ruler like Chavez, or Stalin who will just eliminate them from them from power permanently.
As for my premise, I would have been just fine if I left the whole reference to the 3/5 rule, and human statement out. By doing so, my objective would have been reached, and received with no backlash. (at least from conservatives)
A learning experience is what it was, and every now and then I am reminded why I need to be careful of how I structure an argument when setting up a premise I am presenting.