Rick Perry and Texas Job Numbers ( How good was job creation in the Lone Star State?)

Full disclosure: I don't like Rick Perry for our next president. I have my reasons that aren't worth going into here. However, when I was watching the GOP debate and pro-Perry people started bringing up Rick Perry's job numbers as a cudgel against other candidates, I looked into the BLS data on Texas jobs. Having familiarized myself with the data, I started noticing claims on the Texas jobs data that started popping up that directly contradicted what I was seeing in the data. So I wanted to clear up a couple of these common misconceptions.

Note: If you are going to comment and you want to introduce some new objection to the Texas job numbers, you MUST provide original data. I spent about 4 hours digging through raw data to write this post. I don't want you to point to some pundit or blog post and take it on their authority, because I've already researched several idiot pundits who are talking directly out of their asses when it comes to the data. I want you to point to the raw data that I can examine for myself. This means links. I refuse to waste any more of my time on speculative bullshit or "Well, I'll wager that the Texas jobs don't really count because..." If you're willing to wager, take that money and put it towards finding the actual data. In short, put up or shut up.

"Texas has an unemployment rate of 8.2%. That's hardly exceptional."

See... that's what I thought when I started looking at the data. I knew that Utah had a lower unemployment rate than Texas and I kept hearing that Texas was go great at jobs, blah, blah, blah, so I looked up the unemployment rate.

So I was going to drive my point home that Texas was nothing special by looking at their raw employment numbers and reporting on those. That's when I saw this:

This may not look like anything special, but I've been looking closely at employment data for a couple years now and I've become very accustomed to seeing data that looks like this.

In a "normal" employment data set, we can easily look at it and say "Yep, that's where the recession happened. Sucks to be us." But not with Texas. With Texas, we say "Damn. Looks like they've recovered already."

(To get to this data, go to this link http://data.bls.gov/cgi-bin/dsrv?la then select the state or states you want, the select "Statewide", then select the states again, then select the metrics you want to see.)

But if Texas has so many jobs, why do they have such a high unemployment rate? Let's take a closer look at that data.

As a percentage of the number of pre-recession jobs, here is a chart of the growth of a selection of states. (For clarity, in this chart I selected a number of the largest states and tried to focus on states that have relatively good economic reputations. I did not chart all 50 states b/c it would have taken me too long.)

We can see that Texas has grown the fastest, having increased jobs by 2.2% since the recession started. I want to take a moment and point out that second place is held by North Dakota. I added North Dakota to my list of states to show something very important. North Dakota currently has the lowest unemployment rate of any state at 3.2%. And yet Texas is adding jobs at a faster rate than North Dakota. How can this be?

The reason is that people are flocking to Texas in massive numbers. Starting at the beginning of the recession (December 2007), let's look at how this set of states have grown in their labor force.

As you can see, Texas isn't just the fastest growing... it's growing over twice as fast as the second fastest state and three times as fast as the third. Given that Texas is (to borrow a technical term) f***ing huge, this growth is incredible.

People are flocking to Texas in massive numbers. This is speculative, but it *seems* that people are moving to Texas looking for jobs rather than moving to Texas for a job they already have lined up. This would explain why Texas is adding jobs faster than any other state but still has a relatively high unemployment rate.

"Sure, Texas has lots of jobs, but they're mostly low-paying/minimum wage jobs"

Texas median hourly wage is $15.14... almost exactly in the middle of the pack (28th out of 51 regions). Given that they've seen exceptional job growth (and these other states have not) this does not seem exceptionally low.

But the implication here is that the new jobs in Texas, the jobs that Texas seems to stand alone in creating at such a remarkable pace, are low paying jobs and don't really count.

If this were true, all these new low-paying jobs should be dragging down the wages data, right? But if we look at the wages data since the beginning of the recession (click to enlarge, states are listed alphabetically)

And it turns out that the opposite is true. Since the recession started hourly wages in Texas have increased at a 6th fastest pace in the nation.

As a side note, the only blue state that has faster growing wages is Hawaii. Just thought I'd get that jab in since so many people have been making snarky "Yeah, I could get a job in Texas is I wanted to flip burgers!" comments at me on Twitter.

"Texas is oil country and the recent energy boom is responsible for the incredible jobs increase."

In identifying "energy jobs" I cast as wide a net as possible. If you want to replicate my findings, go to this link: http://www.bls.gov/sae/data.htm, click on "One-Screen Data Search", then select "Texas", then select "Statewide", then in Supersectors select "Mining and Logging", "Non-Durable Goods" and "Transportation and Utilities" and then in Industries select "Mining and Logging", "Natural Gas Distribution", "Electric Power Generation" and "Petroleum and Coal Products Manufacturing".

Tedious, I know, but transparency is important and this is how you get the data.

When we finally get the data, we discover that energy isn't really the biggest part of the Texas economy. Increases in jobs in the energy sector (or closely related to it) account for about 25% of the job increases in the last year. Since the energy sector only makes up 3% of all employment, there is some truth to this claim.

However, take the energy sector completely out of the equation and Texas is still growing faster than any other state. This indicates to us that the energy sector is not a single sector saving Texas from the same economic fate as the rest of the states. It's not hurting, but Texas would still be growing like a weed without it.

"Texas has 100,000 unsustainable public sector jobs that inflate the growth numbers."

I'm not sure where this one comes from, but the numbers are these (and can be found by selecting government employment from the data wizard at this link http://www.bls.gov/sae/data.htm):

Counting from the beginning of the recession (December 2007) the Texas public sector has grown 3.8%, or a little under 70,000 employees. This is faster than normal employment, but it's not off the charts.

Given that the Texas economy has grown so much and private sector jobs have grown so much, that doesn't strike me as an unsustainable growth in the public sector.

But, just in case you're really worried about it, you can lay your fears to rest because in the last year the Texas public sector has shrunk by 26,000 jobs. In the last 12 months, Texas lost 31,300 federal employees, trimmed 3,800 state jobs, and increased local government jobs by 8,400 jobs.

(To be fair, this was partially driven by the role Texas employees played in the census, which inflated federal job numbers this time last year. Since the census numbers stabilized, federal employment has been at about break-even.)

My Personal Favorite Chart

I'll leave you with my personal favorite chart. I mentioned at the beginning that Texas is seeing high unemployment in a large part because they're growing so damn fast. The problem with this from a charts and graphs perspective is that it leaves worse states off the hook, making them look better than they actually are. Looking at unemployment alone, we would conclude that Wisconsin has a better economy than Texas. But Wisconsin is still 120K short of it's pre-recession numbers. The only reason they look better than Texas is because 32,000 people fled the state.

During that time, 739,000 people fled into Texas. Anyone who takes that data and pretends that this is somehow bad news for Texas is simply not being honest. At the worst, I'd call it a good problem to have.

So, to give something of a better feeling for the economic situation across states, this chart takes the population of the states I selected above and judges the current job situation against the population as it stood at the beginning of the recession.

Using that metric, Texas would have a very low unemployment rate of 2.3%. But the fact that unemployment in the United States is fluid means that the unemployed flock to a place where there are jobs, which inflates its unemployment rate (at least in the short term). It's not a bad thing for Texas... it just looks bad at first glance.

You may have noticed that I don't mention Rick Perry very much here. That is because Rick Perry is, in my opinion, ancillary to this entire discussion. He was governor while these these numbers happened, so good for him. Maybe that means these jobs they are his "fault". Maybe the job situation is the result of his policies. Or maybe Texas is simply the least bad option in a search for a favorable economic climate.

That is not an argument I'm having at this exact moment. My point is to show that most of the "excuses" you will hear about Texas' job statistics are based in nothing more than a hope that Rick Perry had nothing to do with them and not on a sound understanding of the data.

My advice to anti-Perry advocates is this: Give up talking about Texas jobs. Texas is an incredible outlier among the states when it comes to jobs. Not only are they creating them, they're creating ones with higher wages.

One can argue that Perry had very little to do with the job situation in Texas, but such a person should be probably prepare themselves for the consequences of that line of reasoning. If Rick Perry had nothing to do with creating jobs in Texas, than why does Obama have something to do with creating jobs anywhere? And why would someone advocate any sort of "job creating" policies if policies don't seem to matter in when it comes to the decade long governor of Texas? In short, it seems to me that this line of reasoning, in addition to sounding desperate and partisan, hogties its adherents into a position where they are simultaneously saying that government doesn't create jobs while arguing for a set of policies where government will create jobs.

Or, to an uncharitable eye, it seem they are saying "Policies create jobs when they are policies I like. They don't create jobs when they are policies I dislike."

People will continue to argue about the data. But hopefully this will be helpful in sorting out reality from wishful and desperate thinking. I mentioned on Twitter that the Texas jobs situation was nothing short of miraculous. This is why I said that and why I'm standing by that statement.

“How good was job creation in the Lone Star State?”

#####

Rick Perry, or any government official at any level, does nothing to create jobs, EXCEPT to stay out of the way of those that can, and do.

How many of those 739,000 FLOCKED from south of the border???? Thanks to Perry’s pro open borders stance

A few RINO darts for good ole Perry

Schwarzenegger, Perry, Napolitano, Richardson urge “comprehensive” immigration reform

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2763274/posts?page=1

Perry to protect undocumented-immigrant tuition

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2764421/posts

Perry endorses Rudy Guiliani for president in 2008
http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/019691.html

Perry works toward increasing H1Bs...
http://www.globalmobilityreport.com/50226711/us_governors_seek_h1b_visa_increase.php

Governor Perry throws support behind H1Bs
http://news.cnet.com/8301-10784_3-9776360-7.html

Perry opposes border fence
http://24ahead.com/blog/archives/006987.html

>> ... any government official at any level, does nothing to create jobs, EXCEPT to stay out of the way of those that can, and do

What you say is true, but its fundamental truth does nothing to diminish its fundamental importance.

Put another way, all government can and should do in a free market economy is NOT to screw it up... but resisting the temptation to screw it up is a crucial attribute in a policymaker.

Using that metric, Texas would have a very low unemployment rate of 2.3%.

In other words, because so many people are entering the state looking for jobs -- which they'll probably find, but at the moment, have not found -- that tends to inflate the unemployment figures from the usual frictional unemployment number of 2-3% to about 8%. Makes sense.

>>>>”Yesterday, Texas governor and sudden Republican presidential frontrunner Rick Perry said that if Ben Bernanke tried any of that money-printing stuff in Texas, he’d be strung up. “If this guy prints more money between now and the election,” Perry told some Iowans, “I don’t know what y’all would do to him in Iowa, but we would treat him pretty ugly down in Texas.” (Iowa’s last execution was in 1963, so Iowa would probably not kill him.)

Among many Americans, especially wealthy rich white political pundits who live in gated communities in Maryland, it is considered “folksy” and charming to explicitly remind people of and seemingly endorse America’s ugly history of lynch mobs doling out “frontier justice,” but even among those who see nothing wrong with white-washed nostalgia for gruesome, lawless vigilantism, Perry’s comments were thought to have gone a bit too far. (Accusing the Republican-appointed chairman of the Federal Reserve of “treason” was a “serious unforced error,” according to John Podhoretz.) New York Times Washington correspondent Binyamin Appelbaum summed up one strand of establishment response to the comments by calling Perry’s remakrs “horrifying.”<<<.....

“even among those who see nothing wrong with white-washed nostalgia for gruesome, lawless vigilantism, Perry’s comments were thought to have gone a bit too far.”

So, people who saw nothing wrong with it thought it went too far?

Color me puzzled...

“Rick Perry, or any government official at any level, does nothing to create jobs, EXCEPT to stay out of the way of those that can, and do.”

Almost comical to say it, but I’d call a government official that has the good sense to stay out of way as being ‘accomplished’. Too often (see NY for example) it’s the ‘helping’ that is doing the damage.

I’m one of those lines representing persons who fled to this great State. You know... it’s been over a year and I just don’t seem to mind not paying state tax (and a bajillion other NY taxes, surcharges, and fees). And then there’s jobs - turns out there’s this thing here called ‘employers’, there were much fewer from where I came from.

It was a pretty state and I miss the family back home, but I’m a New Yorker by birth, Texan by choice.

Thanks for presenting the case for Texas the way you did. It seems you have no adjenda other than to present the truth and I thank you.

I’ve been here eight years, worked everyday I’ve been here. There are those who will tell you there aren’t any jobs worth working........we call them “good for nothin’s” and, yes, we have our share.

If your willing to work hard and act right come on, if you want to tell us how you did things in NY or Calif......don’t bother, we don’t want you.

Thanks for presenting the case for Texas the way you did. It seems you have no adjenda other than to present the truth and I thank you.

If your willing to work hard and act right come on, if you want to tell us how you did things in NY or Calif......don’t bother, we don’t want you.

Good work!

I've been a TX resident for 30 years, and am admittedly not a big fan of Perry. It was hard for me to pull the lever for him the past two elections.

There's two things that Rick has going for him now:
1. The RINOs, led by Karl Rove, are at odds with him.
2. Bachmann's campaign manager is Ed Rollins, and we all remember how Rollins bailed to work for Perot.

Roughly 50% of Texas’ job growth is directly attributable to surging commodity prices thanks to loose monetary policy from the Fed. Most of the rest is secondary growth spurred indirectly by growth in the energy and ag sectors.

It’s not magic, and Rick Perry had little/nothing to do with it. As soon as the Fed quits turning the dollar into toilet paper, Texas will go bust again, and they’ll still be paying for all the corporate welfare handouts Perry’s made over the last 10 years.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.