Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AfricanChristian
If the US had not entered the war on the side of Britain, British possessions east of the Suez would have been lost.

That is not correct -- Indians had no aim to see British Imperialism replaced by Japanese and the Indian army gave the Japanese a big defeat at Kohima

Also the Australian army was still there to head back home

British holdings east of India may have been lost, but not India or australia

57 posted on 08/23/2011 3:53:15 AM PDT by Cronos ( W Szczebrzeszynie chrzaszcz brzmi w trzcinie I Szczebrzeszyn z tego slynie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: Cronos

I disagree.

Without the distraction of the US Navy and the US Military, the Japanese would have easily taken over sparsely populated Australia and India would have been the next logical step from Burma.

A certain Mr. Bose and the Indian National Army were not too displeased with the Japanese. (In fact, an international airport has been named after him).


58 posted on 08/23/2011 5:07:24 AM PDT by AfricanChristian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson