Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sarah Palin Has Millions Of Reasons For Delaying Her Announcement
08/14/2011 | Brices Crossroads

Posted on 08/14/2011 12:00:53 PM PDT by Brices Crossroads

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-235 next last
To: SoConPubbie
Bookmarking for the enjoyable experience of showing how wrong you are when she announces.

I'm looking forward to the day when you tell us a Perry for President bumper sticker is on your car!

21 posted on 08/14/2011 12:23:52 PM PDT by RINOs suck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Brices Crossroads

BRAVO!
What a great explanation of Sarah’s “strategery”!
This woman hasn’t been hiding, or just making money as a consultant- she has a brilliantly thought out plan, and she is the process of executing it, much to the dismay and befuddlement of many.
Patton would be proud.

Palin, you magnificent bastard!


22 posted on 08/14/2011 12:23:59 PM PDT by sillsfan (Reagan and Sarah are right- WE win, they lose!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RINOs suck

Bachmann will be out of money in a couple months.


23 posted on 08/14/2011 12:24:17 PM PDT by free me (Sarah Palin 2012 - GAME ON!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Brices Crossroads
Brice ~

Thanks for another cogent analysis regarding Sarah Palin and her timing strategy for entering the GOP nomination race. All of the points you raise seem valid, specifically that Palin will be outspent by establishment candidates and that a longer campaign benefits them, not Palin. Like many Palin supporters, I'm anxious for Sarah to declare her candidacy but not to the point where doing so too soon would weaken her position for any reason. Obviously, I want Sarah Palin to defeat Barack Obama. Frankly, I think whomever the Republican candidate is will beat Obama. His support in every demographic is slipping fast, for good reason. Hence, I very much want Sarah Palin, a true conservative, not just a 'campaign conservative' to be the Republican nominee in 2012. If that means she waits a little longer to declare her candidacy, so be it.

I would note that late last week, in Iowa, Palin stated that September would be the 'drop dead' month for her to announce. She also said something that one can take two ways, which many in the media, did. She said that she didn't want to "string people along." That could mean, as some stated, with much certainty, that Sarah Palin was not going to run, using the phrase "string people along" as absolute 'proof' that Palin didn't want to waste people's time, meaning (still with me?) she didn't really plan to run. However, I saw it as a simple statement of fact because she knows there are many, many people (like me) that very much want her to run and she doesn't want to keep us in perpetual suspense. Of course, only Sarah Palin knows what she'll do but I have faith that she'll choose to run. Not for personal aggrandizement but to serve her beloved country in a time of need.

24 posted on 08/14/2011 12:27:32 PM PDT by Jim Scott ( "Game On!" - Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brices Crossroads
I listen ad nauseam to posters, some who are pro-Palin and some who are anti-Palin, discourse about Sarah Palin's entry (or non-entry) into the 2012 Presidential sweepstakes, generally advising her to "Hurry up!".

I agree. They are acting like rabid animals.


25 posted on 08/14/2011 12:28:00 PM PDT by Cobra64 (Common sense isn't common anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brices Crossroads

Good summary for us to keep in mind (and use in our never-ending debates with the PDS crowd ;-)

Perry has a record that is pretty shaky in spots and Bachmann has a lot of support amongst “us” but has never even won a statewide election. You’ve got to go back to Abe Lincoln to find a person who’s been elected POTUS with only House experience. Not saying it couldn’t happen, but odds are against it, especially when the campaign heats up and the focus is put on executive experience, and the facts behind the so-called miraculous job-creation in Texas come out.

And as you say, being the guy who replaced George W. Bush doesn’t quite have the cachet it might otherwise have.


26 posted on 08/14/2011 12:28:58 PM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Brices Crossroads
"forming an exploratory committee", "announcing", "declaring", "announcing you are going to announce", and all the rest of that crap is playing the enemy's game.

Look, powerful forces have captured the national government. Enemies control the capital.

If they can control the process, they can keep their gains. They dictate process. They dictate procedure. They announce who is qualified, and what you must do to qualify.

Someday, someone, will use the constitutional process to fight back. ALL YOU NEED IS TO BE ON THE BALLOT IN 50 STATES ON ELECTION DAY.

The rest of it is a game, the rules of which are contrived to keep patriots and constitutionalists OUT.

I don't know what she is going to do. Maybe she'll endorse Perry tomorrow and make me a fool.

But what I think is that she wants to forge a coalition that is sick of the political status quo AND wants to take our country back from the malignant forces that control her now.

I'm willing to wait until Labor Day.

Labor Day, 2012, that is.

27 posted on 08/14/2011 12:32:01 PM PDT by Jim Noble (To live peacefully with credit-based consumption and fiat money, men would have to be angels.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner

LOL. Explains a great deal.


28 posted on 08/14/2011 12:32:40 PM PDT by sarah fan UK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: sillsfan

“This woman hasn’t been hiding, or just making money as a consultant- she has a brilliantly thought out plan, and she is the process of executing it, much to the dismay and befuddlement of many.”

She has obviously studied Reagan’s 1976 and 1980 campaigns, as has Steve Bannon, who refers to them constantly and who was thinking of them when he made “The Undefeated”. She knows how to tun an insurgent campaign (having run one in AK with great success) She will avoid the mistakes the Gipper made.


29 posted on 08/14/2011 12:32:53 PM PDT by Brices Crossroads
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Brices Crossroads

I don’t remember people making a fuss when Ronald Reagan waited til the end of November to announce he was running..why should it be any different for Sarah Palin, when she announces her decision it will be on HER terms, people gotta stop obsessing over it..like anyone knows what her true intentions are, no one knows, she will do what is best for her and her family..her family is #1, if they sit down, have a meeting, and decide that the best thing to do is run she will do it


30 posted on 08/14/2011 12:34:31 PM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

I don’t think it’s as much as carrying the right message but more like implementing the right agenda. Most candidates speak “conservatism” quite well during campaigns but lack the will, desire or the talent to enact the conservative agenda once elected. Sarah Palin is looking for a results leader, not a conservative orator. IMO, she’ll have to run because the other candidates do not fit the bill for one reason or another.


31 posted on 08/14/2011 12:34:30 PM PDT by upsdriver (to undo the damage the "intellectual elites" have done. . . . . Sarah Palin for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/businesstechnology/2014601450_alaska27.html


32 posted on 08/14/2011 12:34:46 PM PDT by PSYCHO-FREEP (Always Remember You're Unique.......(Just Like everyone Else.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Brices Crossroads
S A R A H

33 posted on 08/14/2011 12:35:03 PM PDT by I see my hands (Keep your sunny side up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: free me

“Bachmann will be out of money in a couple months.”

She spent $200K just buying the 6000 votes at Ames (of which she got 4800), not to mention the barbecue, transport and other things. She probably dropped a million on the meaningless straw poll. She will be broke before Halloween.


34 posted on 08/14/2011 12:35:41 PM PDT by Brices Crossroads
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Brices Crossroads

BC - Maybe Mitt will chip in some cash to keep her viable eh?


35 posted on 08/14/2011 12:38:19 PM PDT by sarah fan UK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Brices Crossroads

Thank you! Easily the best (and most encouraging) explanation for her timing.


36 posted on 08/14/2011 12:38:21 PM PDT by Mach9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brices Crossroads

Thanks for another great piece of analysis, many valid points in there!


37 posted on 08/14/2011 12:38:42 PM PDT by zzeeman ("We can evade reality, but we cannot evade the consequences of evading reality.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Brices Crossroads

You very well may be right. But I believe she not only knows whether she is going to run but has known for some time (per Bristol’s comment a month or so ago). Yet she continues to claim that she hasn’t decided yet.

I am tired of the tease. This is not what I expect from someone who bills herself as a different kind of politician.


38 posted on 08/14/2011 12:40:12 PM PDT by freespirited (Stupid people are ruining America. --Herman Cain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Scott

Jim,
Very good analysis. Nothing much is going to change between now and the end of September-early October. If she wasn’t running, she would tell us now and have done with it. She knows her supporters are restless and I think she wants to calm them but she is most focused on the prize...the victory.

It will be well worth the wait.

BC


39 posted on 08/14/2011 12:40:18 PM PDT by Brices Crossroads
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Brices Crossroads

I’ve been saying for some time that announcing before Labor Day would be dumb. You provide good additional reasons for saying that.


40 posted on 08/14/2011 12:40:35 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-235 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson