Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Rational Thought
I hadn't seen that but thanks.

I was referring to the Tweets that were posted to FR during the day. Amazingly unflattering report. Her stretching of the truth started bothering be a couple of months ago. On top of that she apparently set something up today in spite of rules against it. I think the woman is character challenged. I get beaten up here for expressing that opinion, but that is just the way I see it.

BTW, just saw a rerun of Gov Palin on Hannity. That interview looked more like a campaign speech than an interview. Interesting that she gave props to Newt and T-Paw.

33 posted on 08/12/2011 9:52:02 PM PDT by gov_bean_ counter (I am declaring 2011 the year of ME.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: gov_bean_ counter

What on earth would she give props to T-Paw about? There is absolutely nothing redeemable about him. He sucked in the debate last night.

The person that deserved the most props for last nights debate was Santorum, who, when asked whether abortion should be legal in the case of rape, said “NO”. Since rapist won’t be punished with death, why should the baby be punished with death?

T-Paw followed that up with a half-hearted, tepid answer on abortion. Why would Sarah praise him for anything?


68 posted on 08/12/2011 11:23:35 PM PDT by Retired Greyhound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson