Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/12/2011 2:19:40 PM PDT by NYer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: wagglebee; little jeremiah

Ping!


2 posted on 08/12/2011 2:20:20 PM PDT by NYer ("Be kind to every person you meet. For every person is fighting a great battle." St. Ephraim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer

So what? Anyone expect the Administration to obey the law?


3 posted on 08/12/2011 2:21:22 PM PDT by tips up (Living is easy with eyes closed, misunderstanding all you see.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer

WoooHooo!


4 posted on 08/12/2011 2:25:32 PM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer
I am not at all surprised.

Frank Hull is a first class judge. I knew her back when she sat on Fulton Superior Court. I was lead counsel in a real hot-potato case: a challenge to the City of Atlanta/Fulton County "assault weapons ban".

She is indeed a liberal, and she told me she wasn't very happy about ruling in our favor, but the law was on our side and that was that. I told her I understood. :-D

So she doesn't let her politics interfere with her judging. She's also extremely smart (she was a partner at a big Atlanta litigation firm before she went on the bench).

She is an excellent judge and a real "profile in courage". She's going to catch some flak from her colleagues for this.

5 posted on 08/12/2011 2:27:35 PM PDT by AnAmericanMother (Ministrix of ye Chasse, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer

Politico notes that this is the first ruling against the law by a judge appointed by a Democrat
+++++++++++++++++
Proving that knowledge of the law or the case is only of marginal importance in the decisions of the judges. Much easier to just read the NYT before making up your mind.


7 posted on 08/12/2011 2:37:43 PM PDT by InterceptPoint (w)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer

Any decent human being muchless a President would say my bad and delete ObamaCare. He knows it is harmful and controlling and does not care.


9 posted on 08/12/2011 2:40:36 PM PDT by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid! (S&P wasn't worried about us not lifting the debt ceiling - they are worried about the spending)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer
Credit rating agencies tend to reflect on all types of credit worthiness.

Ratings downgrades have consequences.

11 posted on 08/12/2011 2:43:26 PM PDT by blackdog (The mystery of government is not how Washington works but how to make it stop)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer
I'm not getting over-excited yet.

I am now beginning a new letter-writing campaign of my own to my own Indiana state legislature and attorney general. Our state treasurer is challenging Dick Lugar for his U.S. Senate seat, and so I'm including him in all correspondence.

We must keep hammering away with our outrage that a Marxist-Socialist man occupying the presidency, and his minions, want to tell us what we must purchase, month after month for the rest of our lives. And we know what that means, a complete manipulation of the Commerce Clause to bring us into universal bondage to the federal government, in every area area of our lives.

We must not let up in our prayers.

We must not let up in our protest: OPEN PROTEST against Marxist-socialism being foisted upon our beloved Nation.

17 posted on 08/12/2011 2:52:53 PM PDT by John Leland 1789
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer

Thats the picture of an Absolute MADMAN/BOYCHILD! Really scary and terrifying!! maybe someone can repost it in larger format on this thread?


18 posted on 08/12/2011 2:54:00 PM PDT by True Republican Patriot (May GOD SAVE OUR AMERICA from ALLAH and his Prophet, HUSSEIN OBAMA!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer

I believe once Obamacare reaches the Supreme Court they will also rule it unconstitutional.

The Supreme Court does not operate in a vacuum. They can see the financial mess our country is in and they also know that adding one more entitlement program to the already overburden taxpayer may very well be the straw that breaks the taxpayers back.

Allowing it to be implemented will just hasten the collapse of our nation, I do not think even the liberals on the court want that.


21 posted on 08/12/2011 3:15:24 PM PDT by CIB-173RDABN (California does not have a money problem, it has a spending problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer

May I be the first to say a big Thank You!
To the Judge? It is a blessing to have Judges
That will rule according to the law rather than
According to who is in power.


22 posted on 08/12/2011 3:20:39 PM PDT by trustandobey (I STAND WITH ISRAEL " NOT GOING TO HAPPEN")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

The FReepathon Is 43 Days Old

If We Don't Meet Our Budget This Is Your Booby Prize

Click The Pic To Donate

26 posted on 08/12/2011 3:57:36 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (America! The wolves are here! What will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer

Repeal the whole thing. 0bamaCare stinks.


33 posted on 08/12/2011 6:55:33 PM PDT by TigersEye (Life is about choices. Your choices. Make good ones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson