Skip to comments.
Looters in Court: Britain Sends Tough Signal with Fast-Track Justice
Der Spiegel ^
| August 11, 2011
| Matthias Gebauer
Posted on 08/11/2011 10:45:41 AM PDT by Second Amendment First
The British government has pledged to take a firm stance against those arrested during this week's riots. Courts across the country have been working around the clock to deal with the flood of cases. The hearings provide an insight into Britain's frustrated and violent underclass.
John M. is desperate. The 43-year-old, who is wearing torn jeans, stumbles aimlessly around in the corridors of London's Highbury Corner Magistrates Court, begging for help. M., who is from Liverpool, explains that he got a call on Wednesday morning, telling him that his 19-year-old son David had been arrested in London on Monday evening. The father doesn't know yet what his son, who lives in the London borough of Camden with his older brother, has been charged with. Neither can his son's court-appointed lawyer help him -- he hasn't seen the public prosecutor's documents.
"It could be that David took something when the looting began and the shops were standing open," John M. says. "But any one of us would have done the same." He looks at the SPIEGEL ONLINE reporter with wide eyes, seeking a sign of agreement.
(Excerpt) Read more at spiegel.de ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 next last
Like looters and moochers everywhere these thugs consider themselves entitled to others property.
To: Second Amendment First
2
posted on
08/11/2011 10:47:37 AM PDT
by
expatguy
(The Expat Needs Beer Money - Cough Up!)
To: Second Amendment First
The fruits of the entitlement mentality.
3
posted on
08/11/2011 10:49:36 AM PDT
by
mardi59
To: Second Amendment First

Hopefully they busted this guy, not just for looting, but for being stupid enough to post his picture with the booty.
4
posted on
08/11/2011 10:50:00 AM PDT
by
dfwgator
To: All
No, you piece of garbage, the majority of us wouldn’t have...
To: Second Amendment First
It could be that David took something when the looting began and the shops were standing open,” John M. says. “But any one of us would have done the same.”
________________________________________________
AH no
To: Second Amendment First
Do they really think that is “tough”?
7
posted on
08/11/2011 10:50:47 AM PDT
by
SuzyQue
To: Second Amendment First
“Anyone one of us would have done the same, right.”
No, a**hole, actually we wouldn’t. I hope your punk kid goes to prison for a thousand years.
8
posted on
08/11/2011 10:51:10 AM PDT
by
Lurker
(The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
To: Second Amendment First
"Any one of us would have done the same."
Somehow, I'm not feeling very sympathetic for John M. or his son.
When Terry, 32, appeared before the court in the late afternoon, the hearing didn't take long. According to the charges, the young man was arrested on Tuesday night in a broken-into phone shop in Camden as he was looking around for valuable loot. The judge turned down a request for a conditional release because of the suspect's record of repeatedly violating probation. On top of that, the police had also found cocaine and crack on the suspect.
When Terry was finally led off back to the basement, his red-haired sister, who was sitting in the public gallery, lost it. "You whore," she yelled at the female judge. "You don't give us a chance. The only thing you can think of is to lock us up."
The Brits missed a hell of an opportunity to clean up their gene pool.
9
posted on
08/11/2011 10:51:35 AM PDT
by
Little Ray
(FOR the best Conservative in the Primary; AGAINST Obama in the General.)
To: expatguy
When Terry was finally led off back to the basement, his red-haired sister, who was sitting in the public gallery, lost it. "You whore," she yelled at the female judge. "You don't give us a chance. The only thing you can think of is to lock us up."Tough justice? The judge apparently didn't even hold this sista in contempt.
10
posted on
08/11/2011 10:51:51 AM PDT
by
Second Amendment First
("Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not..." - Thomas Jefferson.)
To: Second Amendment First
The court’s quick justice will probably be to give them a REALLY stern warning against doing that again..........
11
posted on
08/11/2011 10:53:10 AM PDT
by
OB1kNOb
(Obama will heretofore be known in history as the downgraded President.)
To: Second Amendment First
Without reading the article, are they spanking their bottom sna d sending them to bed with only 3/4 of their government checks?
12
posted on
08/11/2011 10:54:57 AM PDT
by
vpintheak
(Democrats: Robbing humans of their dignity 1 law at a time)
To: Second Amendment First
John M. says. "But any one of us would have done the same." You must have been a heck of a good parent, idiot.
13
posted on
08/11/2011 10:55:05 AM PDT
by
GeronL
(The Right to Life came before the Right to Happiness)
To: Second Amendment First
A couple of well placed shots would end this quick...
...if not that, what?...
...if not now, when?...
14
posted on
08/11/2011 10:55:11 AM PDT
by
B.O. Plenty
(Give war a chance...)
To: Second Amendment First
When Terry was finally led off back to the basement, his red-haired sister, who was sitting in the public gallery, lost it. "You whore," she yelled at the female judge. "You don't give us a chance. The only thing you can think of is to lock us up."
Was Dr. Who standing next to the red-headed sister, cooing and nodding in agreement with how rotten the evil conservatives are?
15
posted on
08/11/2011 10:55:26 AM PDT
by
bvw
To: Second Amendment First
A speedy trial used to be a civil right now its a tough thing?
16
posted on
08/11/2011 10:58:42 AM PDT
by
GeronL
(The Right to Life came before the Right to Happiness)
To: Second Amendment First
"It could be that David took something when the looting began and the shops were standing open," John M. says. "But any one of us would have done the same."The keywords being "any one of us." That is just so true. The "us" that he speaks of are simply ill bred animals that have no place in society at all as far as I'm concerned. I was raised a whole lot different than the "one of us" type of people. I'm not one of them and damn glad I'm not. Thank you Mother for teaching me proper.
17
posted on
08/11/2011 10:59:24 AM PDT
by
Graneros
("It is no exaggeration to say that the undecided could go one way or another.")
To: Little Ray
18
posted on
08/11/2011 11:01:37 AM PDT
by
GeronL
(The Right to Life came before the Right to Happiness)
To: Little Ray
Sound like quality human beings don’t they?
lol
/s
19
posted on
08/11/2011 11:03:49 AM PDT
by
GeronL
(The Right to Life came before the Right to Happiness)
To: Second Amendment First
And this from the a$$hole's father
"It could be that David took something when the looting began and the shops were standing open," John M. says. "But any one of us would have done the same." He looks at the SPIEGEL ONLINE reporter with wide eyes, seeking a sign of agreement.
Holy s**t - shoot the whole family and make the world a better place.
The judges, who can currently only decide between continued detention and conditional release, are under massive pressure
WOW - Conditional Release. That'll show 'em.
20
posted on
08/11/2011 11:05:16 AM PDT
by
from occupied ga
(your own government is your most dangerous enemy)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson