To: dools0007world
You apparently missed her line about reevaluating entitlements. I saw it. "Reevaluating entitlements" is an even weaker line that we usually get from politicians who use "Reform entitlements". This is a straight talker? Ok.
51 posted on
08/08/2011 5:45:54 PM PDT by
triumphant values
(Never criticize that to your right.)
To: triumphant values
Please take your personal problems elsewhere.
55 posted on
08/08/2011 5:51:25 PM PDT by
gov_bean_ counter
(JMO but I reserve the right to be wrong...)
To: triumphant values
58 posted on
08/08/2011 5:55:45 PM PDT by
Evil Slayer
(Onward, Christian soldiers, marching as to war)
To: triumphant values
Sarah has written a WSJ op-ed on entitlement reform and has consistently written in her Facebook about Social Security Reform and Medicare reform...what's your problem?
Your problem is you got your panties ties in a knot, you either don't read what she says and thus don't have a clue or you are trying to be snarky and picking on things
To: triumphant values
No mention of Social Security or Medicare cuts. Ping me when she’s serious. Palin long ago endorsed Paul Ryan's Path to Prosperity plan, which includes Medicare and Medicaid reform: That's a serious, that's real, and that's specific.
If you're going accuse Palin of being unserious about entitlement reform, you ought to be serious about being informed.
79 posted on
08/08/2011 6:32:43 PM PDT by
AHerald
("Do not fear, only believe." - Mark 5:36)
To: triumphant values
I think there’s real good chance you won’t have a 2nd FR anniversary.
89 posted on
08/08/2011 6:47:12 PM PDT by
tomkat
(Sarah '12)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
