Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/08/2011 5:35:59 AM PDT by rellimpank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: DaveLoneRanger

—ping—


2 posted on 08/08/2011 5:49:20 AM PDT by rellimpank (--don't believe anything the media or government says about firearms or explosives--)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rellimpank

Lets see - scour the internet looking for pictures that may belong to others. Then purchase the rights to them. Then sue the infringer. Nothing predatory there.

IMHO the new copyright holder’s options should be restricted to a cease and desist order, after all, the original owner had recourse to the same technology to find the infringement and did not pursue it.

I do not condone using other people’s work without permission or compensation (especially as an artist myself), but some of the examples of things they have pursued are hard to defend. This seems somewhat like a private, civil, ex post facto scheme than a legitimate enterprise that protects either the creators’ rights or the general respect for law it proports to engender.


3 posted on 08/08/2011 6:26:33 AM PDT by Apogee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson