[itsahoot]

The difference is that palin's(™) actions over the past two years give every evidence of a financial motive driving them.

The fact that she is making money does not show that it is her only motive, that assumption, you make entirely of whole cloth.

[Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!]

To your sig quote. I get it... I am sick off the entire ponzi scheme and both parties and republicans that are really democrats but I hope that your write Palin’s name in even if she does not run thought; is just you or we will have Obama again.

[wtc911]

The fact that she is making money does not show that it is her only motive, that assumption, you make entirely of whole cloth.

--------------------------------

Stop making things up.

1. I did not write that making money is her only motive.

2. When something is said to be 'made from whole cloth' it means that it is utterly without factual foundation.

I submit that given the fact that Palin(™) has, since quitting, devoted the lion's share of her energies to...

Two book sales ($$$)

Two TV gigs ($$$)

Paid speeches ($$$)

Trademarking her brand (strictly a market driven move)...

it is more than accurate to state that personal enrichment of the financial kind is very high, if not primary on her list of motives.

There's absolutely nothing wrong with this and I applaud her dedication to success in the marketplace but there is no way to interpret (honestly at least) that her post-quitting energies have been expended more in pursuit of public service than in the pursuit of personal wealth.