Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I don't understand all of this, but I do understand that only idiots can't learn from history. We need to stop the damn spending.
1 posted on 08/04/2011 6:40:02 PM PDT by Recovering_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Recovering_Democrat
Keynesianism has failed every time it is tried.

2 posted on 08/04/2011 6:45:53 PM PDT by Uri’el-2012 (Psalm 119:174 I long for Your salvation, YHvH, Your law is my delight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Recovering_Democrat

“Fear the Boom and the Bust”, Austrian School v. Keynesianism in a nutshell.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d0nERTFo-Sk


4 posted on 08/04/2011 6:48:11 PM PDT by hc87
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Recovering_Democrat
What frustrates me to no end is that if Obama had overhauled the income tax system back in the spring of 2009 so it has lower compliance costs and encourages savings and investment, our economy would be BOOMING right now, thanks to bringing back a large majority of that US$14 TRILLION in American-owned liquid assets now sitting in foreign banks for tax avoidance reasons. The result would have been a "private bailout" that would have made Obama's stimulus plans look like a minor event in comparison, and it would NOT required a huge amount of deficit spending to pull it off!
5 posted on 08/04/2011 6:49:16 PM PDT by RayChuang88 (FairTax: America's economic cure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Recovering_Democrat
This is all due to the one thing that Bush, Obama, the Republicans, the Democrats, and every existing major media mogul agrees was the right thing to do: correct market trends, stabilize and then stimulate the macroeconomy. One word: fail.

Correct. Yet we keep doubling down and going all in on the same stupid bet. That fail will just become a FAIL

6 posted on 08/04/2011 6:55:29 PM PDT by paul51 (11 September 2001 - Never forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Recovering_Democrat

Keynes is easy once you understand the government become the dominant player in the economy. Are politicians ever going to give up such power? Not likely.


7 posted on 08/04/2011 7:00:43 PM PDT by JimSEA (The future ain't what it used to be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Recovering_Democrat

Whatever happened to “The Summer of Recovery”? Did the Tea Party conspire with Sarah Palin to muck it up?

Dastardly....


8 posted on 08/04/2011 7:06:52 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Recovering_Democrat

Good read. Except the problem is that the people on the “Losing Team” are in charge. The MSM paints them as the “Wise Adults in the Room”. So, expect the status quo to continue for the indefinite future. Actually, I’m very pessimistic. I think you need a full blown revolution to purge this thinking from the System once and for all.


10 posted on 08/04/2011 7:16:06 PM PDT by rbg81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Recovering_Democrat
This is all due to the one thing that Bush, Obama, the Republicans, the Democrats, and every existing major media mogul agrees was the right thing to do: correct market trends, stabilize and then stimulate the macroeconomy. One word: fail.

They may be right about the above, but that doesn't mean their own economic theory is desirable.

11 posted on 08/04/2011 7:21:11 PM PDT by Moonman62 (The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Recovering_Democrat
This is all due to the one thing that Bush, Obama, the Republicans, the Democrats, and every existing major media mogul agrees was the right thing to do: correct market trends, stabilize and then stimulate the macroeconomy. One word: fail.

No, I don't think "this is all due" to that.

The policies followed in 2008, if seen through by a market-defending administration, might indeed have had a radically different outcome than the same policies in the hands of marxists, as they are now.

The current administration is anti-business, anti-American, anti-prosperity, anti-good, essentially, and pro-death. To mention Bush and Obama in the same sentence in this context is an egregious lapse that casts doubt upon the entire thesis.

13 posted on 08/04/2011 7:45:29 PM PDT by _a_0_0_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Recovering_Democrat

The author says we are “back in recession.”

Huh? At the tail end of Bush’s second term, we were in a recession. Obama came along and turned a recession into a full-blown depression. And it’s been steadily getting worse because of Obama and his cohorts.


17 posted on 08/04/2011 8:39:41 PM PDT by july4thfreedomfoundation (The top 1% earn 20% of America's income yet they pay 40% of all federal income taxes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Recovering_Democrat

“I don’t understand all of this...”

####

“Economics in One Lesson” by Henry Hazlitt will help you.

The one lesson is simply that ALL parties to an economic policy or transaction need to be considered. Hazlitt expounds on that fundamental principle concisely and elegantly throughout the rest of his short, easy to read book.

In practical terms, nearly ALL government fiscal policy is dmagaing in that it simply steals from one area of the economy to benefit another.

Economics without the obfuscation and criminal game-playing is really quite simple.


19 posted on 08/04/2011 9:14:02 PM PDT by EyeGuy (2012: When the Levee Breaks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Recovering_Democrat
So how long will it take these maroons to realize that raising the debt ceiling is destroying the economy, thus apparently requiring more raising of the debt ceiling.

To infinity and beyond, indeed !

21 posted on 08/04/2011 11:04:37 PM PDT by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Recovering_Democrat
We need to stop the damn spending.

If you wanted to DESTROY the United States, you'd want it to spend itself into poverty. With an investment of a few $hundred million and you wouldn't have to pay all of that yourself, the whole house of cards can be brought down that Jimmy Carter and the Dems started decades ago.

Who is Obama, the guy who spends $Trillions? You really don't know anything about him but what you are told. No grades from college, no friends that remember him in college, virtually nothing.

So why is Obama spending when the country can't afford it (and never could afford these kinds of figures). You won't believe me if I tell you exactly who this guy is.

You'll get another hint when on September 20 Obama does not veto the UN efforts to make Israel withdraw to pre-1967 borders. Israel will be undefendable with 1967 borders. Why would Obama support this?

Why would Obama want to give Egypt US Tanks?

Why would Obama support the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt?

Why would Obama secretly meet with the Muslim Brotherhood who have sworn they will destroy Israel?

Why is Obama using US military to illegally attack Libya?

How many more "HINTS" does Obama have to give you before you figure out who he is?

22 posted on 08/05/2011 12:23:51 AM PDT by politicianslie (Democrats are COMMUNIST, Repubs are SOCIALIST, and Barry's a Muslim manipulating USEFUL RINO IDIOTS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson