It would almost certainly be medically wiser to take it in vaporized form than literal smoke with all the crud that goes along with it. A marijuana equivalent of N’joy. That said, it usually takes much less marijuana smoke than tobacco smoke to get the wanted effect from the respective “weed.”
Agreed. That said, from a federalist, libertarian standpoint, I say “buyer beware” and let the consumers decide. Informed consumers can decide for themselves whether or not to partake. FReedom requires self restraint. Where individuals lack thereof, the law should be brought to bear against those that act contrary to said law. The argument against so-called “hate crimes” legislation has the same basis: If you beat/maim/kill someone in a manner other than required in self-defense then you obviously don’t “think well” of the victim, or you wouldn’t have committed the act that you did or are accused of. It doesn’t matter what you were thinking when you acted; we have laws prescribing actions against lawbreakers, and there are set penalties for violation of such. What one’s motivations are that lead to such action are entirely irrelevant,
If I had experienced the vaporizer method, which I certainly have not, I would deem it inferior to direct combustion in terms of delivery of the requisite goods. ;)