Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Support shifts as Boehner adds balanced-budget amendment
The Hill ^ | July 29, 2011 | The Hill Staff

Posted on 07/29/2011 9:33:47 AM PDT by Tulsa Ramjet

House Republicans will link passage of a balanced-budget amendment to Speaker John Boehner’s (R-Ohio) last-ditch debt-ceiling plan, which GOP lawmakers said would move the measure to passage in a high-stakes vote later on Friday.

Republican lawmakers voiced confidence the enhanced bill would pass muster with conservatives, as Rep. Mo Brooks (R-Ala.) predicted the balanced-budget amendment change would bring 10 to 20 more GOP members on board.

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: balanced; boehner; budget; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-188 next last
Its amazing what the new centurians (newly-elected conservatives) can accomplish if they stick together.
1 posted on 07/29/2011 9:33:51 AM PDT by Tulsa Ramjet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tulsa Ramjet

The GOP had best learn to play hard ball with the members it has now, because I don’t see them getting too many more.

TEA party yes...GOP not so much.


2 posted on 07/29/2011 9:36:48 AM PDT by chris37 (representative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tulsa Ramjet

What’s the big deal about the House passing this. The buffoons in the Senate said they aren’t going to pass it and the Kenyan said he’d veto it. This is nothing but an exercise in stupid.


3 posted on 07/29/2011 9:37:13 AM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Hey Barry! Compromise this!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tulsa Ramjet

bump.


4 posted on 07/29/2011 9:37:54 AM PDT by ken21 (liberal + rino progressive media hate palin, bachman, cain...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tulsa Ramjet

God Bless them! This is about saving our Constitutional Republic from a bunch of commie thugs and it is time to put it all on the line.

Let the record show that OBAMA and his socialist minions trashed what real Americans want and need for their country. And there is no doubt.


5 posted on 07/29/2011 9:38:03 AM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tulsa Ramjet

All a balanced budget amendment does is makes you have a balanced plan. But that plan can include as much borrowing as you like. And that plan can include overly rosy projections on everything.

It doesn’t make you live within in your means. And what’s the penalty if congress doesn’t reach an agreement on a balanced budget?


6 posted on 07/29/2011 9:38:09 AM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tulsa Ramjet
Can you say "Thank You, Tea Party!"?
7 posted on 07/29/2011 9:39:24 AM PDT by moovova (Obama rolled up his sleeves...and cut 2 strokes off his golf score.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tulsa Ramjet

No wonder Reid and Chuckie just now came front and center.


8 posted on 07/29/2011 9:39:37 AM PDT by ILS21R ("Every night before I go to sleep, I think who would throw stones at me?", she said.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tulsa Ramjet
Does anyone seriously believe that there are 290 votes in the House for a BBA (never mind 67 in the Senate)?

Besides, a BBA is a waste of time. Any BBA which could pass Congress will have enough loopholes to make it meaningless.

The States need to amend the Constitution to extend the gold and silver clause in Article I section 10 to the Federal government, and a balanced budget will be the result.

9 posted on 07/29/2011 9:39:54 AM PDT by Jim Noble (To live peacefully with credit-based consumption and fiat money, men would have to be angels.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

>>What’s the big deal about the House passing this. The buffoons in the Senate said they aren’t going to pass it and the Kenyan said he’d veto it. This is nothing but an exercise in stupid.<<

Sort of.

You have to hit the ball into the other court and the opponent bears responsibility for what they do with it. At least this one has some good top-spin.


10 posted on 07/29/2011 9:40:51 AM PDT by RobRoy (The US today: Revelation 18:4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tulsa Ramjet

Hot damn. Now pass it.


11 posted on 07/29/2011 9:41:07 AM PDT by Principled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

then THEY own it. Not us. They don’t WANT to own it. Screw them.


12 posted on 07/29/2011 9:41:29 AM PDT by MestaMachine (Guns don't kill people, the obama administration does. (Gunwalker Ping List))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tulsa Ramjet

I agree...

I still believe this will fail in the Senate...More so with this amendment to the bill...

I had heard there was a convention of agreement in the GOP circles up there that the BBA was going to be presented as a stand alone bill...

I think they are reaching, but at least we’ll better know what the outcome is going to be, and that has got to pizz the WH off to no end...

They’ll (dems and the WH) can’t really manipulate the demise of the BBS without getting egg on their faces...I think even the stupid people voting base they have won’t like that part of the deal...

All in all it is coming to a head, and this pimple is going to pop, and it ain’t going to be pretty...

Just my opinion...


13 posted on 07/29/2011 9:41:38 AM PDT by stevie_d_64 (I'm jus' sayin')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tulsa Ramjet

Since we know the Liberals will not even discuss any Boehner plan, why not use the opportunity to present a consolidated position?

Should have done this right from the start.


14 posted on 07/29/2011 9:41:47 AM PDT by SMARTY (A claim for equality of material position can be met only by a government with totalitarian powers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

No. As Reagan proved, symbolism is important.


15 posted on 07/29/2011 9:42:32 AM PDT by MrChips (MrChips)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tulsa Ramjet

This is another stupid trick.

We’ll get a much larger debt limit, moved out of the way for Obama’s reelection campaign, more taxes, more spending.

Any budget cut will be promised for some other Congress to ignore, and a “balanced budget amendment” to be put off for endless House votes and eventually, years from now, ratification by the States. In terms of the current spending problem, “never”.

A statutory budget cut- passed as a bill by Congress- will happen. Promising to make some future annual budget lower carries no legal weight and as we have seen over the last 40 or so years won’t ever happen.


16 posted on 07/29/2011 9:42:44 AM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Principled
Hot damn. Now pass it.

"Let's roll."

17 posted on 07/29/2011 9:42:48 AM PDT by Night Hides Not (My dream ticket for 2012 is John Galt & Dagny Taggart!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer
It reminds me of the Israelis giving up more and more land for peace! HA! It never works ... they just keep getting bombed.

Republicans keep compromising-- and for what?? "no good deed" and all that.

18 posted on 07/29/2011 9:42:48 AM PDT by jackv (The darkness hates the light!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer
and the Kenyan said he’d veto it

Naturally the Kenyan will veto it - - the whole purpose of the Balanced Budget Amendment is to rein in and stop people like Ubama and his ilk. The important thing is that he actually be forced to veto it for the whole nation to see. And that's after the Senate rats have to go on record. See, Reid and his scumbags don't even want to have to vote on a Balanced Budget Amendment. They need to be forced to do so.

19 posted on 07/29/2011 9:43:17 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tulsa Ramjet
This time if the House passes it they need to leave town immediately. Make the Senate Rats deal with it, without compromise.
Boehner still has the power to sell us out and I believe he will try.
20 posted on 07/29/2011 9:43:16 AM PDT by tobyhill (Real Spending Cuts Don't Require Increasing The Debt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-188 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson