Posted on 07/29/2011 7:33:04 AM PDT by RobinMasters
Attorney, doc experts to show up at Hawaii Department of Health with court document
Computer scanning expert Doug Vogt and typesetting expert Paul Irey say they will accompany attorney Orly Taitz when she presents to the Hawaii Department of Health a subpoena that should allow her to examine Barack Obama's original 1961 typewritten birth certificate.
Vogt and Irey both told WND they are making travel plans to join Taitz in Honolulu when she goes to the state agency at 10 a.m. on Monday, Aug. 8, to present the subpoena in person.
"We will plan to hold a press conference late in the day of Aug. 8," Vogt said, "and if the document we see varies from the birth certificate documents the White House released, we plan to file criminal charges in Hawaii immediately."
Get the New York Times best-seller "Where's the Birth Certificate? The Case that Barack Obama Is Not Eligible to be President," by Jerome Corsi.
Vogt shared with WND a copy of a letter he has written to Hawaii Attorney General David Louie, putting Louie on notice regarding the reasons he believes the birth certificate released by the White House is fraudulent.
WND previously reported on Vogt's decision to file a 22-page criminal complaint with the FBI.
Irey says it won't take long to evaluate the original birth record, if it exists.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Hawaii will not let them see it.
They cannot afford to admit that they are complicit in this fraud.
The records will be sought but will not be found.
Hawaii will claim that the records have been stolen.
It has been my opinion from the start that the President attended College as a foreigner, regardless of whether he was born in the United States or not. Those who chase the birth certificate might be right about it being a fraud, but that focus allows the Pres. to continually stall those who chase. The fraud he’s covering has to do with his collge years. Either he lied to get aid as a foreign student, or he was a foreigner as per his adoption by Lolo Soetoro who never re-applied for US citizenship upon his return from Indonesia.
This is having to do with the Social Security Number case that Taitz has filed in Washington, DC.
1) Since when did "African" become a "race?" In the time that the BC was issued we had the Caucasian race, the Indian race, the Oriental race, the Negro race (which became called the Black race in the late '60's), the Jewish race, etc. The word Black, and previously Negroid, were the common terms used then. There was no PC issue about calling people of brown or black skin " Africans" (as in African Americans) until much later. Many of that color skin are from other locations anyway...islands, for example. So how can Obama's BC state "African" race when that term was not used when he was born. I would like to have it compaired with other Blacks born in Hawaii during the same year to see how their race is listed.
Besides "Africa" is a continent anyway, not a country and there are many people there of different races, including Caucasians, Orientals, etc. Stating "African" as a race on a BC would be like putting "American" as the race of a white person born in Kansas, USA. American might be a person's country, but Caucasion is the race. It appears to me that issue alone could prove that Obama's BC is a fraud.
)Then there is the issue that Kenya was not a country the year Obama was born, and Kenya is listed as his father's place of origin. Kenya did not become a country until 1963, two whole years after Obama's birth, and 27 years after his father's birth. How could Obama's father have been born in a country that did not yet exist? Up and until Kenya was formed in 1963, it was known as the "British East Africa Protectorate".
3)Regarding the hospital that Obama was born in. On the birth certificate released by the White House, the listed place of birth is "Kapi'olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital". This cannot be, because the hospital(s) in question in 1961 were called "KauiKeolani Children's Hospital" and "Kapi'olani Maternity Home", respectively. The name did not change to Kapi'olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital until 1978, when these two hospitals merged. How can this particular name of the hospital be on a birth certificate dated 1961 if this name had not yet been applied to it until 1978?
The Democrats start sh*tting bricks. The Knee Jerk Reactionary Republicans/Conservatives that have spent the last 2 years shouting us down end up with egg on their face and have to eat crow. "Birthers" are vindicated.
Even if one is found to exist, it still does not obviate the fact that too many people accepted these claims with far too little scrutiny.
On August 5th, under emergency session, The Hawaii legislature will declare, and Gov. Abercormbie will sign legislation proclaiming August 8th a Hawaii state holiday. All offices will be closed.
I think you are exactly right.
Wouldn’t it be necessary to prove he wasn’t born in Hawaii before anything could really happen?
Not only is that completely false, it doesn't magically change Hawaii's policy regarding release of documents.
Your question presupposes accuracy on the part of the person filling out the birth information. *IF* the long form we've seen is actually the original birth certificate for Obama, it is readily apparent to me that Barack Obama Sr. was no where near the document when it got filled out. Instead, it is highly likely that Stanley Ann was the person that wrote his name and information on the paperwork. That Stanley Ann may have made some mistakes or had bad information is not remarkable to me.
2)Then there is the issue that Kenya was not a country the year Obama was born, and Kenya is listed as his father's place of origin.
That is likewise not remarkable. The Name "Kenya" was used all over that region for something like a Century before 1961. I believe the region is named for mount Kenya. The people of the region have called it Kenya long before it became it's own country. Stanley Ann, (who probably never heard of Kenya prior to meeting Barack) simply wrote down what Barack had told her previously.
3)Regarding the hospital that Obama was born in. On the birth certificate released by the White House, the listed place of birth is "Kapi'olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital".
The problem with this theory is that the Nordyke Birth Certificate uses the exact same name of the Hospital as does the Obama certificate. Whatever the claim is regarding when the Hospital was called what, the fact that a Genuine 1961 birth certificate uses that exact name trumps all theories that it shouldn't.
I believe you just exposed the Nordyke birth certificates as forgeries.
http://nativeborncitizen.files.wordpress.com/2010/10/nordyke-61.gif
No, it's true. I got the same chain email.
Not at all. The Sh*t storm would start the instant it is learned that there is something wrong with what ought to have been an ordinary and straightforward document. If his current document is based on anything other than an actual Hospital generated birth certificate, it will confirm that this needed to be looked at with a less cavalier attitude years ago.
If that document shows any funny business, it would cause a lot more people to question his eligibility. If enough people do it, his Presidency might be revoked. If he is not born in Hawaii as he has continuously asserted for the last several years, he is political toast, and he may be legal toast as well.
Enlighten us. Why is this false?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.