Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

George W Bush 'was projecting calm' with 9/11 blank look
The Telegraph ^ | 7/29/11

Posted on 07/29/2011 2:21:29 AM PDT by markomalley

George W Bush says his blank reaction to the first news of the Sept 11 attacks while US president was a conscious decision to project an aura of calm in a crisis.

In a rare interview with the National Geographic Channel, Mr Bush reflected on what was going through his mind when he was informed that a second passenger jet had hit New York's World Trade Center.

Mr Bush was visiting a Florida classroom at the time, and the incident - which was caught by television cameras - has often been used by critics to ridicule his apparently dazed response to the attack

"My first reaction was anger. Who the hell would do that to America? Then I immediately focused on the children, and the contrast between the attack and the innocence of children," Mr Bush said.

Mr Bush said he could see journalists at the back of the classroom getting the news on their own cellphones "and it was like watching a silent movie."

Mr Bush said he quickly realised that a lot of people beyond the room would be watching for his reaction.

"So I made the decision not to jump up immediately and leave the classroom. I didn't want to rattle the kids. I wanted to project a sense of calm," he said of his decision to remain seated and silent.

"I had been in enough crises to know that the first thing a leader has to do is to project calm," he added.

(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: 911; bush; conservatives; lamestreammedia; leftists; liberals; media; mentaldisorder; propaganda; socialism; terror; terrorism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-177 last
To: Rockingham

Would you want W declaring martial law, taking control of Louisiana just because the Louisiana leadership did not care if her citizens drowned if it meant a chance to rebuff a President who could have easily kept the death toll down to a hundred or so? Instead of 1300?

Blank-o made 100% clear to the POTUS that New Orleans should drown rather than accept NG assistance under a Republican Administration, THREE DAYS BEFORE KATRINA HIT.

That was murder of NOLA citizens. I’m sure you hate that, but I’d LOVE to see you try to refute that. Blank-o used the Constitution to MURDER her citizens.


161 posted on 07/31/2011 5:41:15 PM PDT by txhurl (Did you want to talk or fish?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: Rockingham

Rehabilitate Pres. Bush’s reputation? He was a great president and we were fortunate to have him at the helm for those 8 yrs. It’s the ungrateful twits around the country that needs rehabilitating .........and an education. It’s unfortunate that the steady negative drumbeat by the left against that fine man managed to sway so many so-called conservatives.


162 posted on 07/31/2011 5:57:11 PM PDT by upsdriver (to undo the damage the "intellectual elites" have done. . . . . Sarah Palin for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: upsdriver

And that drumbeat is trying to figure a way to paint Perry as a horrible man, too.

That drumbeat mesmerized otherwise half-sane people to elect zero into office, and they’re starting Act II as we speak, on this forum and everywhere else.

They’re working with the RINO establishment to associate the TEA party with every wicked thing in the world.

Establishment-driven and financed, they simply can’t cope with self-contained, self-financed under-the-radar subs running silent. Cloward-Piven didn’t address or instruct as to this ‘enemy’.


163 posted on 07/31/2011 6:09:00 PM PDT by txhurl (Did you want to talk or fish?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: Rockingham

You are misreading my comments. I am telling you Bush would have been criticized by the opposition no matter how he reacted that day. If you don’t understand that, you are taking your cues from the opposition where you know it or not.

Heck it is a sign that you probably watch CBS or ABC or NBC or MS-NBC or CNN or read something like the NYTimes or Washington Post or etc. How would you expect to be an informed person if you get news from such propoganda outlets?


164 posted on 07/31/2011 7:27:18 PM PDT by JLS (How to turn a recession into a depression: elect a Dem president with a big majorities in Congress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: txhurl

Blanco was a dolt but not a murderer.


165 posted on 07/31/2011 8:46:07 PM PDT by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: upsdriver

Bush transgressed conservative principles in numerous respects: out of control domestic spending; a federal education bill that was drafted by Teddy Kennedy; an expensive addition of drug coverage to Medicare; poor planning for the occupation of Iraq; failure to control the borders and enforce the immigration laws; and a failure to mediate conflicts among subordinate agencies and officials.


166 posted on 07/31/2011 8:52:47 PM PDT by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: Rockingham
Now you're just moving the goalposts.

I'm sure most freepers have problems with at least a few of Bush's policy decisions.

But the original post was about his reaction on 9/11.

On that one, you're just going to have to accept that your view is one shared almost entirely with mouth-breathing commies.

167 posted on 07/31/2011 9:00:18 PM PDT by Trailerpark Badass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: JLS
Unfortunately, Bush opened himself to criticism by staying with the kids in the classroom after being told that the country was under attack. Some other basis for criticism surely would have been found by his adversaries, but that particular point of criticism was legitimate.

Conservatives criticized Bill Clinton for ducking calls from the military because he was in the middle of a golf game, and in another instance, if I recall correctly, Clinton dodged a meeting on a military issue because he was with Monica Lewinsky. Similarly, John Kennedy is said to have cavorted with girlfriends instead of taking meetings with his military aides.

Having embraced such criticisms against Democratic Presidents, we cannot fairly claim that Bush is immune to criticism for not acting immediately when the country is under attack. And, by the way, I learned about the incidents with Democratic Presidents from sources other than the New York Times.

168 posted on 07/31/2011 9:25:32 PM PDT by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: Rockingham

If Bush walked across Lake Ponchatrain during Katrina, his detractors would have said, “See, he can’t swim.”


169 posted on 07/31/2011 9:28:26 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: Rockingham

You lost the argument BIGTIME


170 posted on 07/31/2011 10:32:35 PM PDT by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: Trailerpark Badass

Had Clinton or Obama or any Democratic President acted in such a manner as Bush did on 9/11 after learning of the second attack, conservatives would roundly criticize them — and justly so.


171 posted on 08/01/2011 4:15:32 AM PDT by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: Rockingham
You're wrong.

I understand you want to rationalize your position and dump it onto others, but sorry, enjoy your commiseration with idiot liberals.

172 posted on 08/01/2011 6:53:26 AM PDT by Trailerpark Badass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: Rockingham

He finished his appearance in the classroom, and then made his way to a podium where he addressed the nation FROM THE SCHOOL.

I would think the time he took in the classroom allowed his staff to get ready for that event, and plan on where the President was going to be taken next.

Given the threat was airborne, using commercial heavies, the time was spent planning where and when to take him.

I personally was hoping he’d have nuked Syria, Iraq, Iran, and Saudia Arabia at the time, but he took nearly a week to announce what he was going to do about things.


173 posted on 08/01/2011 8:01:59 AM PDT by RinaseaofDs (Does beheading qualify as 'breaking my back', in the Jeffersonian sense of the expression?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: RinaseaofDs
On 9/11, President Bush addressed the country not in the morning from the school in Sarasota but later in the day from Barksdale Air Force Base in Louisiana. The standard protocol for dealing with an attack on the country and a danger to the President is to get him to safety and to secure communications facilities as soon as possible.

In keeping with that protocol and for the sake of safety and communications, Bush ought to have immediately been hustled out of the classroom and into the Presidential limousine, which is heavily armored and has superb communications facilities. The limousine would have then been driven to Air Force One, which would have promptly taken off.

This procedure was followed on 9/11 -- but not immediately. Instead, Bush continued with the scheduled class PR event. In the absence of communications with and directions from President Bush, Vice President Cheney and other officials made critical decisions, such as grounding all air traffic, ordering any errant flights to be shot down, and permitting bin Laden family members -- potential witnesses and intelligence assets -- to leave the country immediately on specially chartered jets that were exempt from the grounding order.

I am with you on nuking the authors of the 9/11 attack. There were plenty of fingerprints that suggest the involvement of the Saudi and Pakistani intelligence agencies. Key information on this point continues to be withheld from the public.

174 posted on 08/01/2011 9:33:16 AM PDT by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: Rockingham

We might disagree on this point, but as CO’s go, I’ve had far, far worse CO’s and CEO’s.

I can’t imagine having Obama handle such a thing. Or Carter.


175 posted on 08/01/2011 9:44:58 AM PDT by RinaseaofDs (Does beheading qualify as 'breaking my back', in the Jeffersonian sense of the expression?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: RinaseaofDs

Bush, in spite of his faults, was far, far better than the Democratic alternatives on offer. And on one key issue — the Iraq surge — he bet against Washington wisdom and won a major victory for himself and the country.


176 posted on 08/01/2011 9:57:04 AM PDT by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
This utter BS. Bush looked like a deer in the headlights. Anyone would have been in shock at what they had just heard, Bush included.
Bush's problem here is not only was in shock he continued to read to the little children. He should have left immediately to take charge, he didn't.
Putting out this BS story in time for 10th Anniversary I guess is designed to make him look better. Well it really doesn't.
Did he say this in his book or is this new material???
177 posted on 08/01/2011 10:01:32 AM PDT by Captain Peter Blood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-177 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson