Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Longbow1969

That would be the practical effect of overturning Roe v Wade anyway. What matters most is if he will appoint conservative judges who will overturn Roe. From that point the states can begin banning abortion on their own.

____________________________________________________

No, it would not. The candidate I supports supports a reversal of Roe v. Wade AND an Amendment granting rights to the unborn.

Perry’s defferal to the States is a lame cop-out.

I’m disappointed.


23 posted on 07/27/2011 7:25:59 PM PDT by Responsibility2nd (The views and opinions expressed in this post are true and correct. Deal with it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Responsibility2nd
No, it would not. The candidate I supports supports a reversal of Roe v. Wade AND an Amendment granting rights to the unborn.

Yes it would. Abortion was a state issue before Roe, and it will be a state issue once Roe is overturned.

If you kill someone, it is your state that prosecutes and imprisons you - not the federal government.

The right course of action is overturning Roe and letting the states go about the business of restricting and banning the murder of unborn babies.

48 posted on 07/27/2011 7:49:15 PM PDT by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson