To: DoughtyOne
Hey you dumb asses, does it matter if she got him re-elected or not?Post 72, spoken by a dumb ass who can't even remember what he said.
89 posted on
07/28/2011 1:13:57 PM PDT by
Lakeshark
(Thank a member of the US armed forces for their sacrifice)
To: Lakeshark
Link me to where I said it was all Palins fault.
Hey you dumb asses, does it matter if she got him re-elected or not?
Post 72, spoken by a dumb ass who can't even remember what he said.
Do you know the difference between a declarative statement and a question? Well no, you don't. And thus, who is the dumb ass?
Attempting to use that question was silly for two reasons. It wasn't a declaritive statement, and it provided two options, one scenario where she got him re-elected and one in which she didn't. And yet, in your mind it equated to a firm statement that I said she had gotten McCain reelected. That's just sad.
Since you want to post comments from that post, lets post all of it. LINK
Just look at the defense for the supporter of John McCain for re-election..
My what solid Conservatives we have here.
Hey you dumb asses, does it matter if she got him re-elected or not?
I guess the premise now is that she could support Obama in 2012 too, since she couldnt get him re-elected on her own.
The unmistakable inferrence here is that she couldn't have gotten McCain re-elected all on her own. I am by no means convinced of that, but for the sake of argument I accepted your premise and ran with it.
Does that last sentence buttress your claim that I stated she definitely got McCain reelected? No. And that's why you left it out.
I consistantly see you using the Jackson, Sharpton, Frank, et al method of addressing issues. If facts don't support your premise, make them up. Confuse the issues. Lie if you have to. Just get the job done. The ends justifies the means. Why are you using a Marxist propaganda tool against reasoned Conservatives here?
The point was, you do what's right whether you are going to affect the outcome or not. I'm sorry you don't have the mental faculties required to grasp that premise.
At times I'm going to harp on what comes next. It's pointless to bring it up every day, but I will never forget Palin out there stumping for the likes of John McCain. McCain
Every time John McCain stabs us in the back over the next five and a half years of his Senate term, I'm going to remind folks of someone else who stabbed us in the back.
Enjoy. I'm sure not!
Character counts?
This radio endorsement LINK ran from at least February through July of 2010. LINK It may have run longer. It was being played on the two largest radio stations in Phoenix.
Palin on FoxNews endorsing McCain. LINK
Video of Palin campaigning with McCain during his reelection bid. LINK
I particularly like the part where she declares him our greatest champion. (paraphrased) A close second was her claim that everyone present at the rally was a member of the Tea Party, a back-handed way of claiming John McCain was strongly endorsed by Tea Party members.
92 posted on
07/28/2011 2:00:12 PM PDT by
DoughtyOne
($1.8 tril yearly deficits = $18 tril in ten years. So now we're proposing $4 tril in cuts? Really?)
To: Lakeshark
93 posted on
07/28/2011 2:03:21 PM PDT by
PSYCHO-FREEP
(Always Remember You're Unique.......(Just Like everyone Else.))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson