Your points were incoherent and irrelevant to anything I can imagine.
You seem to argue that Woolly Mammoths did not live in the arctic, yet that is exactly where many of their carcases have been found, some frozen in the ice.
So I'll ask again: what are you trying to say about Woolly Mammoths?
BJK: “what are you trying to say about Woolly Mammoths?”
Just that all the holes in your long ages evolution theory are big enough to drive a ‘mammoth-sized’ truck through if you actually cared enough to read any opposing viewpoints [see my links page for more].
The hair on these mammoths was shown scientifically to be for cooling purposes. They each had a dietary need for roughly 40 lbs of vegetation daily therefore the arctic was not cold when they were thriving there [more likely lush and tropical], but they were all killed in an ice storm of epic proportions.
Furthermore, according to the hydroplate theory [per Dr. Walt Brown creationscience.com] you will never find any fossils under the ground where any of their carcasses lay.
Bonus: How to brainwash someone - mix lies with truth and repeat over and over again esp. from a supposed position of authority while ridiculing and belittling any/all opponents.