I was under the impression that Gadhaffi, although in truth the absolute ruler of Libya, in fact has no official position i.e. he is not Head of State. Does this put another angle on your freezing assets theory?
The bedou are themselves muslims, so in opposing the muslim brotherhood, are they the "wrong" type of muslims?
How is Libya a gateway to the south and Nigeria? I can buy it as a route for invasion further west, but south of Libya is 1000+ miles of Sahara.
Assuming you buy into the "Obama is a secret Muslim advancing the cause of islam worldwide" theory, who wants to seize Gaddhaffis wealth, why would the British and the French get involved? What have they to gain from a militant Islamic state on their southern flank? If Obama gets his hands on the money, then theres nothing left for the UK and La belle Francais, is there? Besides, I seem to recall that it was the British who touted the idea of a no fly zone in the first place, to be shot down pretty quickly by Hillary Clinton. It was only later that Obama decided to back the plan. Does that mean that there is dispute between the whitehouse and the State department?
I'm not trying to be funny here, just trying to understand.
Ther history of Africa, its traditional invasion routes on the ground, shows the way to understanding what is happening in relation to Libya. We have no business there.
Its no accident that Obama is following a policy that will open these routes to The Muslim Brotherhood, In East Africa and in the sub Sahara.
And the fact that we are involved in Libya is a travesty.
Of course Gadhaffi is the head of the State of Libya. He was treated as such by every government in the world.And as far as I can see he has not been removed or replaced.Nor will he be. Hillery is not a part of this Obama grift, other than she will participate in the personal aspect of the distribution of Libyan lucre.Thats how they got her to keep her mouth shut.