[MasterGunner01]

Here's one that would scare the the Donkeys and RINOs: the House passes a spending bill for the U.S. government at 2006 levels and no taxes or fee increases. If Harry Reid doesn't like it, send him one for 2005 levels without taxes. Every time Reid balks, cut the budget spending levels back a year.

[6ppc]

Here's one that would scare the the Donkeys and RINOs: the House passes a spending bill for the U.S. government at 2006 levels and no taxes or fee increases. If Harry Reid doesn't like it, send him one for 2005 levels without taxes. Every time Reid balks, cut the budget spending levels back a year.

I like it! That's the Pawn Stars Old Man's method of negotiating!

[SharpRightTurn]

“Here’s one that would scare the the Donkeys and RINOs: the House passes a spending bill for the U.S. government at 2006 levels and no taxes or fee increases. If Harry Reid doesn’t like it, send him one for 2005 levels without taxes. Every time Reid balks, cut the budget spending levels back a year.”

Excellent idea. Or the proposal Rand Paul discussed on Hannity’s show this after noon and pushed by Connie Mack:

Cut all spending by 1% a year for six straight years, each time reducing the baseline. In six years, according to Mack (don’t know if it’s been scored), you would be working with a balanced budget. The Congress could decide where the cuts would be made. If they fail to decide, it’s a 1% cut across the board. These would be real cuts, not reductions in growth like Boehner is talking about where the deficit continues to spiral out of control because of a 7% rise in the baseline year after year.