Posted on 07/25/2011 2:59:37 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
House Republicans have not abandoned their efforts to get an up-or-down vote on their proposed balanced-budget amendment. According to a new report from Politico, any bill cutting a debt-ceiling deal will have a requirement for a future vote in both chambers for the BBA within the next few months:
House Republican leaders are planning to write into the bill that will raise the debt ceiling a provision that would require consideration of a balanced budget amendment in the next few months, according to several GOP sources.
The legislation, which is being written by staff this morning, is likely to include a date certain for a vote on a balanced budget amendment.
“This allows supporters of a balanced budget amendment – including Republican leaders – time to build pressure on Democrats to support this popular and important reform,” a GOP leadership aide told POLITICO Monday. “Remember, the key is the Democrats, because we can’t get to two-thirds with just GOP votes.”
Conservatives, led by Republican Study Committee Chair Jim Jordan of Ohio and Rep. Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.), have been pushing hard for a balanced budget amendment for the last several months. The legislation they unveiled included a super majority for tax increases, rendering it dead on arrival in the House because Democratic support was nil. House Republican insiders say that they are hopeful the tax provision will be dropped in order to have it pass the lower chamber, the Senate and send it to the states.
According to CNN’s poll, a balanced-budget amendment has strong appeal to Americans across all political lines. To recap my analysis from last week’s survey of adults, almost 3 out of every 4 Americans would support the BBA (74/24), even ea Party opponents (56%) and self-professed liberals (61/37). Those are the least-supportive demographics in the survey; in every other category, support for the BBA is at 70% or better.
You know who else would support a balanced-budget amendment? Twenty Democrats in the Senate. The Club for Growth and the Washington Examiner published this video last week after Harry Reid tabled the Cut, Cap, and Balance Act and Steny Hoyer lamented the BBA’s restriction on tax hikes:
Inanticipation of this weekend’s vote, The Club for Growth has posted a video showing 20 current Democratic Senators saying they support a balanced budget amendment. All 47 Republican Senators have said they will vote for a balanced budget amendment. 47 + 20 = 67. 67 is more than enough Senators needed to pass a constitutional amendment.
Why not allow a vote on the BBA, especially after the debt-ceiling hike takes place? Democrats don’t want to go on record as opposing it, fearing what that vote will mean in the next election. Unfortunately for them, it won’t mean anything significantly different than refusing to cut spending and pushing tax hikes as a temporary solution to the chronic problem of overspending.
Republicans need to keep the pressure on the Senate for a floor vote on the BBA.
Update: The Right Scoop has a clip from the Rush Limbaugh show today of John Boehner’s appearance, and his framing of a two-round deal:
First Round:
- 1.1 Trillion in cuts – recommendations made by 6 members of each chamber, occurrence of cuts to be determined – cuts will be non-defense, real and not accounting gimmicks
- 1 Trillion in debt limit increase
- Will last until next April.
Second Round:
- There must be a vote on Balanced Budget Amendment
The White House insists that it won’t sign a deal that doesn’t go through 2012, but that depends on whether Reid tries hard to stop one. If the House passes this bill, it will be the third proposal in writing from Republicans against zero from Senate Democrats and the White House.
Update II: Second round should have been on the BBA, not the CCB. Right Scoop has fixed it as I have.
$25B this year and $28B next year are accounting gimmicks.
Meanwhile these same GOP leaders are too chicken to actually propose a balanced budget.
Damned right! We the TEA party fired a bunch of these big spenders and sent some new blood to Washington to do some serious cutting. We don’t want compromise. No gimmicks! No retreat! No surrender! NO DEALS!!
Just cut, baby, cut or you too will be cut in 2012!!
Cut the spending!! Cut the government!! Cut the taxes!!
Rebellion is brewing!!
And they should start by repealing ObamaCommieCare!!
No compromise means cut the fricken spending already!!
We are in total agreement!
Raising the debt ceiling for any reason whatsoever is absolutely the wrong thing to do. We’re already head over heels in debt. We don’t need to borrow more. We need to quit spending already!! Cut it to the bone!!
No deals!!
Vote the bastards OUT in 2012!!
Lol, I started reading this comment and thought to myself, man, this guy is really fired up.
Then I looked and saw that it was the one and only Jim Robinson.
Way to go, Captain!!
people who bash Boehner’s plan get called DU trolls by some people here....or get told
“You are the sort of defeatist in our ranks that requires an epic slap on your face from your commanding officer.””
Bet that poster doesn’t have the stones to say that to Jim Robinson..hahahaha
Possible increase of taxes. You betcha
http://blog.heritage.org/2011/07/25/conservatives-beware-the-boehner-plan-leads-to-tax-increases/
Absolutely the wrong thing!
I cannot fathom the argument of raising the debt limit (allowing more borrowing/spending) while cutting spending to offset it. It's just crazy.
Just reject the debt limit increase. Worst case scenario becomes the government spends (wastefully) up to the debt limit again. Better case scenario, it might force some reductions in government spending, and force attention (much needed) on the priorities of government spending.
In either case, saying NO to a debt limit increase sets the stage for the REAL step two, which would be to DECREASE the debt limit (again and again), forcing continued reductions in the size and scope of the Federal Government.
Forget arguing for a Balanced Budget Amendment. Whenever anyone hollers "Raise the Debt Limit!", Conservatives should holler "Hell NO, Lower the Debt Limit (again and again)!"
P.S. Notice we're not hearing a peep about the catastrophic Asian stock market meltdown -- that didn't happen!
That Asian melt down ploy was just to panic his rank and file.
It’s happened before and it will happen again.
I just hope they hold strong.
Demint has not so subtly been bashing Boehner.
For those that have been around the Congressional Block..is that very common??? He has been tweeting against Boehner. Establishment versus Tea Party are drawing the lines.
Here are his latest
JimDeMint Jim DeMint
These are downgrade deals that invite the loss of our AAA rating, never end deficit spending, and perpetually increase our debt.
2 hours ago Favorite Undo Retweet Reply
»
Jim DeMint
JimDeMint Jim DeMint
Both plans offered today are political deals, not debt solutions. We don’t need a commission, we need a balanced budget amendment.
JimDeMint Jim DeMint
RT @washingtonpost: Cut, Cap and Balance Coalition pans Boehner’s debt ceiling proposal wapo.st/prPbMx
.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.