Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

If this is true, good for the republicans.


3 posted on 07/25/2011 11:20:58 AM PDT by Tulane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Tulane
It's not true:

But Reid's plan was already being privately rejected by Republicans concerned that the cuts it contains would prove illusory, particularly $1 trillion or so in savings claimed by troop cuts in Iraq and Afghanistan over the coming decade. Reid counters that House Republicans claimed the same savings windfall when they passed their budget earlier this year.

Reid is just doing what cynical bustards always do, give the country the middle finger while accusing republicans of being crude.

6 posted on 07/25/2011 11:24:47 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Tulane

Reid hasn’t “caved”. The $2.7 trillion in “cuts” is pure phoney baloney. No actual cuts are included.


8 posted on 07/25/2011 11:25:14 AM PDT by San Jacinto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Tulane; 240B
Drudge may have got ahead with the headline.

I don;t think this is over yet!

9 posted on 07/25/2011 11:26:54 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Tulane
I am reminded of the historic and valorous communication from Col. David Shoup on Tarawa to Gem Howlin Mad Smith.

"Casualties many. Percentage dead, not known. Combat efficiency, We are winning."

16 posted on 07/25/2011 11:44:39 AM PDT by xkaydet65 (IACTA ALEA EST!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson