Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Angry Gays: F-Bombs, Glitterbombs, Phlegm Phones & Death Wishes
Townhall.com ^ | July 24, 2011 | Dough Giles

Posted on 07/24/2011 5:51:35 AM PDT by Kaslin

(Reader warning: rough language ahead!)

What would happen if Sean Hannity, Dennis Miller, Dr. Keith Ablow, or a conservative barbeque salesman, for that matter, expressed on national television the desire to “F--- the sh-t out of” some powerful, prominent and accomplished liberal woman against her will? Or, in other words, rape said señorita?

Do you think that would make the evening news? Do you think he would get fired from his job? Do you think that all conservatives far and wide would have to profusely apologize and go through sensitivity training for the next eight millennia? The answer to those tres questions would be: duh. You bet they would.

In addition, what if some conservative dude whom the Tea Party currently fawns over got on a popular weekend cable show and said, “I wish all the politicians who support homosexual marriage were f---ing dead”?

Do you think Matt Lauer would do a hit on that diatribe come Monday morning? Do you think the Tea Party darling would have to forfeit his fair perch with the movement? Do you think idiot boy would get a visit from the local police department for uttering such hateful speech against a group of people? The answers to those questions would be … yes, yes and heck yes, he would.

Also, can you imagine if a faction from Focus on the Family showed up at the private business of a liberal with whom they vehemently disagreed, disrupted that workplace, and then strafed offices with buckets of glitter while blaring “Jesus Freak” in the background?

Do you think Rachel Maddow would go mad cow on that ditty come 9:00 p.m. the next day? Do you think the Focus freaks would have trespassing charges pressed against them? Do you think the belligerent Christian vandals would get canned from their jobs at Focus?

I’m a thinkin’ … yes. Why, yes, they certainly would—and pretty dang quickly, mind you, like, so fast it would make your head spin.

And lastly, can you imagine what would happen if Don Wildmon, sick with the flu, somehow snuck into Obama’s personal campaign headquarters and licked doorknobs, keypads, coffee cups and telephone receivers in the hopes of getting Obama severely ill in order to derail an important event and then was actually stupid enough to write about this germ warfare against the prez?

Would that make the news? Would that make people look at the American Family Association and say, “You dudes are some sick and twisted monkeys”? Here, again, I’m guessing bingo.

There’s no way in Hades that conservatives or Christians could get away with that kind of violent rhetoric and criminal activity without the media and the cops landing on their chest with both boots. But do you know who can get away with that kind of bullcrap? Gay activists, that’s who.

Yep, this past week Dan Savage (who is obviously a bubble off level) he would love to “f--- the sh-t” out of Rick Santorum. That’s the same Dan Savage who, sick with the flu, phlegmed Gary Bauer’s phones during his bid for the White House in 2000 and bragged about it.

In addition, homosexual vandals blaring Lady Gaga music blew into the private business of Michele Bachmann’s husband, raised all kinds of hell and then dumped glitter in his offices and were dumb enough to film it (but nary a media peep nor one arrest).

The lesson is clear, little children: If you wanna be a vile vandal but don’t want to be harangued by the media and would like to skate when you should be fined or imprisoned, you might want to consider homosexuality because they can obviously do the aforementioned without any repercussions.

The end.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: domesticpartnerships; douggiles; giles; homonaziagenda; homonazism; homosexualagenda; homoterrorism; terrorism; terrorist; terrorists

1 posted on 07/24/2011 5:51:37 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Dan Savage is going to have sex today with another mans rear end.

If I had to do that, If that’s my day, I would be angry too. (sarc)


2 posted on 07/24/2011 5:58:08 AM PDT by reefdiver ("Let His day's be few And another takes His office")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reefdiver
Eeeeee....uuuu....wwwwwwW!

And a "Good Sunday morning" to you, too.

3 posted on 07/24/2011 6:07:45 AM PDT by Aevery_Freeman (White Hetero Able Male (WHAM) a.k.a. NOT Holder's people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Homosexuality is mental illness. End of story.


4 posted on 07/24/2011 6:27:50 AM PDT by Chainmail
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The queers, liberals and other assorted perverts are getting desperate. They see the end of their tyrannical rule coming.


5 posted on 07/24/2011 6:29:48 AM PDT by Scotsman will be Free (11C - Indirect fire, infantry - High angle hell - We will bring you, FIRE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chainmail

You said it


6 posted on 07/24/2011 7:19:41 AM PDT by Kaslin (Acronym for OBAMA: One Big Ass Mistake America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: reefdiver

I think what you’re labelling “sarcasm” is simply honesty. The man lives a disgusting life. It only makes sense that he would be a miserable and hate-filled person.

Nonetheless, God can give him the grace of repentance and conversion, just like any other sinner. He is mighty to save!


7 posted on 07/24/2011 7:31:16 AM PDT by Tax-chick (Public schools = TSA: incompetent, abusive, anti-American. Why are we putting up with either one?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Umm wow.

If this guy said that he wanted to rape another person isn’t that some sort of verbal threat of violence?

This really disturbs me.


8 posted on 07/24/2011 7:31:29 AM PDT by R0CK3T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

It’s just about love.


9 posted on 07/24/2011 7:47:00 AM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Obama cites the Preamble to the Constitution to ignore the law. The Preamble is the mission statement of the Constitution, ie the LAW-—but liberals read the Preamble as if it’s not just the mission statement for the Constitution, but a mission statement for government making the mission statement the law, itself.

The Preamble says that the Constitution was intended to create a “more perfect union” of states than the previous Articles of the Confederation did-——but liberals such as Obama try to pretend that the Preamble is a grant of de-regulated government that can do whatever it wants in pursuit of Utopian perfect-—even violating the very Constitution meant to restrain that sort of pie in the sky Utopian autocracy.

Look at what liberals have done in twisting the FIRST AMENDMENT into having an “establishment clause” when there really is no such thing.

Properly understood, the first amendment promotes speech and religion and press and sought a free and independent church and press as a check on government and to influence hearts and minds.

Madison’s words are simple, but easily twisted by commies.

“Congress shall make no law pertaining to places of worship or preventing the FREE EXERCISE, thereof.”

That’s what Madison meant. Having a national church did NOT have to be banned because they didn’t have to because 1) they believed in state sovereignty and 2) because the Constitution is about limited government and they wouldn’t have to take away a power from government they never would grant in the first place!

Only a moron could believe there’s some “establishment clause” which prohibits a national church or religion. To belive this is to believe the liberal BIG LIE.

“An establishment of religion” means “church”. Government has no right to interfere with church affairs.....


10 posted on 07/24/2011 7:54:10 AM PDT by Beowulf9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scotsman will be Free

the queers, liberals and other assorted perverts are getting desperate.

- - - - -
I think the opposite it true, they are getting more bold because they see themselves as untouchable.


11 posted on 07/24/2011 8:05:43 AM PDT by reaganaut (Ex-Mormon, now Christian - "I once was lost, but now am found; was blind but now I see")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Why doesn’t anyone point out the obvious.

What Dan Savage said was that he wants to violently rape.

And like many rapists, he wants to do so out of hatred, and because he wants to dominate his victims.

As such, he has identified himself as a sex offender. This isn’t political speech. It is his expressed desire to commit a criminal felony. Were he standing next to a police officer, then looked at someone, said he hated them and he wants to rape them, most police officers would arrest him.

What makes it far worse is that he has also expressed a desire to kill many people. Again, this is not political speech, but sounds more like a tangible threat.

After he made this multiple murder threat, based on the reaction of his peers, he decided to apologize. But the law does not recognize such apologies, especially if multiple threats have been made.

Therefore, if Dan Savage shows up in public, especially around Republicans or conservatives, it should not be forgotten that he has avowed a desire to rape and murder, and is such, should be carefully watched by security personnel as a potentially dangerous person.


12 posted on 07/24/2011 8:13:05 AM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Doug Giles is writing about the usual bunch of rotters out there. Of course as the old parable goes, re the scorpion and the frog, it is just their nature. Hateful, twisted and possibly socio-pathic- we all know what to expect in the coming months.

Not to be picky though, tiz Doug not Dough. (chuckle).

13 posted on 07/24/2011 9:18:02 AM PDT by Peter Libra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut

There is a lot of validity in your statement. Either way, they are storing up a world of hurt for themselves if things go badly in this country.


14 posted on 07/24/2011 9:31:55 AM PDT by Scotsman will be Free (11C - Indirect fire, infantry - High angle hell - We will bring you, FIRE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Scotsman will be Free
There is a lot of validity in your statement. Either way, they are storing up a world of hurt for themselves if things go badly in this country.

True. I'm willing to live and let live if they keep it in the privacy of their homes like we all should but when they start these shenanigans and participate in hooliganism like this, this hurts them and will backfire on them. If there is a collapse, Civil War 2 or some disturbance in this country, my advice to them is to get back in the closet, otherwise they will stick out like sore thumbs.
15 posted on 07/24/2011 10:48:57 AM PDT by Nowhere Man (General James Mattoon Scott, where are you when we need you? We need a regime change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy

Dan Savage is a bully, and like all bullies, he’s a coward.

He loves the Good Life far too much to risk it.


16 posted on 07/24/2011 8:47:41 PM PDT by sinanju
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: R0CK3T
This quote from him should disturb you even more:

http://www.ipce.info/ipceweb/Library/01oct31e_fair_media_trial.htm

"We live in a culture that's hysterical about children and assumes they have no sexual agency or desire," says Dan Savage, an author and nationally syndicated sex columnist. "But anyone who can remember what they were like when they were 11 knows that kids are sexual, and whether it was messing around with their cousin, playing doctor with their neighbor, or making passes at people 10 years older, they were horny. So NAMBLA steps out to articulate all this, albeit in its usual highly dysfunctional and creepy way, and because we know what they say to be true on this issue, we've got to label them as insane perverts. Any attempt at rational discussion about youth sexuality and intergenerational sex is simply shouted down."

17 posted on 07/30/2011 4:34:48 PM PDT by RINOs suck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson