Extra-target rich. Fire at will. Release the dogs. Let 'em have it. Shoot to kill. Torpedoes away!
1 posted on
07/23/2011 9:44:54 AM PDT by
upchuck
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
To: FReepers
Every poll shows that most voters regret that error nowJoe Conason: proud lifetime member of Bizzaro World.
2 posted on
07/23/2011 9:46:48 AM PDT by
upchuck
(No increase PERIOD! Hope & Change = Ball & Chain)
To: upchuck
Extra-target rich. Fire at will. Release the dogs. Let 'em have it. Shoot to kill. Torpedoes away! Joe Conason....
Meh, I don't feel like casting pearls before swine today :)
3 posted on
07/23/2011 9:47:48 AM PDT by
mewzilla
(Forget a third party. We need a second one.)
To: upchuck
“No, dysfunctional is the too-polite term for the House of Representatives”
Yeah, how DARE those filthy conservatives in the House pass a bill that raises the debt ceiling like Obama wants! How DARE they put poor Harry Reid on the spot and have to set aside that bill! Don’t they know that compromise means they give the Dems everything and then go home and explain to their dense, undereducated, ignorant fools of supporters how that is “victory?” How dare they?
sarcasm off
4 posted on
07/23/2011 9:48:15 AM PDT by
Grunthor
(Faster than the speed of smell.)
To: upchuck
"No, dysfunctional is the too-polite term for the House of Representatives, specifically its dominant tea party Republicans, who can be described in far less dainty psychological terms. Even the most extreme Republican partisans in the Senate seem to realize that their House colleagues, seized by some combination of ideology, madness and pig ignorance, are propelling the country and the world toward economic chaos."The same Tea Party members AMERICANS voted in to restore our once great country?
Is that their "polite" way of stating WE THE PEOPLE are beyond dysfunctional?
5 posted on
07/23/2011 9:49:43 AM PDT by
NoGrayZone
("Islamophobia: The irrational fear of being beheaded." Andrew Klavan of PJTV)
To: upchuck
It seems to me that there’s nothing at all dysfunctional about the government at the moment - it’s doing exactly what it was designed to do. We had one party rule up until last year, when the people got angry, and put in place a new House to create divided government and stop the imminent bankruptcy of our nation.
6 posted on
07/23/2011 9:50:01 AM PDT by
americanophile
("this absurd theology of an immoral Bedouin, is a rotting corpse which poisons our lives" - Ataturk)
To: upchuck
What is that leftwing kook, Joe Conason, doing writing for Rasmussen? I thought they locked up Conason many, many moons ago. The boy is crazy. He should be in a loony bin somewhere.
7 posted on
07/23/2011 9:50:04 AM PDT by
FlingWingFlyer
(Hey Barry! Compromise this!!!)
To: upchuck
Gang-of-six = “Ultra Conservative” lol
9 posted on
07/23/2011 9:50:13 AM PDT by
catbertz
To: upchuck
Democracy’s a bitch to the MSM elite.
To: upchuck
The budget proposal and Cut, Cap and Balance is making the libs, RINOs, socialists and MSM particularly mad.
It's not dysfunctional, its spot on target.
They need to keep it up and hold their feet to the fire. The American people showed in 2010 that they know what's going on, and they are going to do so again in 2012, in spite of all of this babble.
11 posted on
07/23/2011 9:51:33 AM PDT by
Jeff Head
(Liberty is not free. Never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
To: upchuck
To: upchuck
Few writers out there that actually appear to be more stupid than an Obama speechwriter.
13 posted on
07/23/2011 9:52:41 AM PDT by
quantim
(Victory is not relative, it is absolute.)
To: upchuck
>>Now those business lobbyists may find out why it isn’t so smart to fund any bozo running for office who claims to support “free enterprise.”
Lobbyists make a very good living by finding ways for organizations to suck off the government teat. We can’t fix this problem as long as we allow lobbyists to breathe our precious oxygen.
15 posted on
07/23/2011 9:53:19 AM PDT by
Bryanw92
(We don't need to win elections. We need to win a revolution.)
Hey, Joe Conason. Since you're an ahole just
16 posted on
07/23/2011 9:54:02 AM PDT by
b4its2late
("Pray for Obama. Psalm 109:8")
To: upchuck
To start with, Pigs are far from ignorant and Mr. Conason is far from correct about the Tea Party.
17 posted on
07/23/2011 9:55:16 AM PDT by
yoe
To: upchuck
The TpCaucus has growing strongly in most places.. but still growing every other place..
Yes.. even in San Fransicko.. and New York City.. even the Detroit area..
So soon Nov. 2010 is forgotten.. Nov. 2012 will be the main event..
Few already don’t have their minds made up on the Obama thing..
Almost everybody has smelled the deep acrid smell of Obamanomics..
To be an Obamanoid can easily brand you as “SILLY”...
NOT raising the debt limit.. is a monkey wrench in Obamas machinery..
It should done with that in mind..
18 posted on
07/23/2011 9:55:24 AM PDT by
hosepipe
(This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole...)
To: upchuck
Hey Joe!
Compromise is highly over rated.
If the government wants more revenue, they need to get off of the backs of the people!
Private business and industry are not hiring because of the additional cost of doing business imposed by Obamacare, the EPA, and countless other Obama czars.
This, in addition to the uncertainty of the new and higher taxes Obama seeks.
If Obama succeeds in mandating higher taxes, what will he do with that money?
He will spend it to buy votes and regulate your life and business!
The fact is Obama is NOT simply after more revenue.
Obama wants to squash America’s free enterprise, industry, and your freedom!
There is nothing to be gained by compromising with this man.
19 posted on
07/23/2011 9:55:37 AM PDT by
G Larry
(I dream of a day when a man is judged by the content of his character)
To: upchuck
FUJC!
20 posted on
07/23/2011 9:55:57 AM PDT by
Enterprise
("Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." Voltaire)
To: upchuck
Obama says that he won't be able to send out Social Security and Veterans Administration checks
- Financially speaking, this has been shown to be wrong by so many.
- Technically speaking, this would throw gov't programmers into a tizzy trying to get this to happen. It's not like there's one program somewhere that a dweeb at some computer decides to run or not. It's like when Ahnold decided that all gov't employees should make minimum wage; it's just not that easy.
23 posted on
07/23/2011 9:56:57 AM PDT by
FourPeas
("Maladjusted and wigging out is no way to go through life, son." -hg)
To: upchuck
They want to pose as defenders of the middle-class and the American dream, even as they promote legislation that would destroy the programs and institutions that are the foundation of that way of life. The middle-class and the American dream are the result of private enterprise, not government largess. It is high taxes and government overspending that are the threat.
To: upchuck
They could listen to ultra-conservative senators like Tom Coburn, R-Okla., and Saxby Chambliss, R-Ga. -- members of the Gang of Six/Seven whose own profound ideological hostility to Obama and the Democrats still leaves space for prudence. Or they could listen to the 65-70% that WANT caps on spending without tax increases, or are WE too stupid to even have a voice?
25 posted on
07/23/2011 9:57:02 AM PDT by
EGPWS
(Trust in God, question everyone else)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson