Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"Dysfunctional" Too Polite to Describe Tea Party Congress
Rasmussen Reports ^ | July 23, 2011 | Joe Conason

Posted on 07/23/2011 9:44:42 AM PDT by upchuck

As America lurches toward new and unfamiliar status as a nation that defaults on its debts, commentators around the world are wondering how the democratic government that was once the most admired in the world -- for many reasons -- is now so "dysfunctional," to use the polite term. But the truth is that the entire U.S. government is not dysfunctional. Much of the government functions well enough or better, and even the members of the troubled U.S. Senate seem to be trying, a little late, to deal with the problem before us.

No, dysfunctional is the too-polite term for the House of Representatives, specifically its dominant tea party Republicans, who can be described in far less dainty psychological terms. Even the most extreme Republican partisans in the Senate seem to realize that their House colleagues, seized by some combination of ideology, madness and pig ignorance, are propelling the country and the world toward economic chaos.

Of course, the tea party Republicans insist that no such thing will ever happen -- the warnings from economists, business leaders, financiers and public officials are merely so much "scare talk."

When President Obama says that he won't be able to send out Social Security and Veterans Administration checks or meet the nation's obligations on Treasury debt come Aug. 2, he is just trying to frighten his opponents into giving up their principles. They don't accept the idea that we have to pay for financial obligations already incurred -- or that the rising interest rates caused by default will make future deficits much deeper.

But they don't have to believe the president to understand that the threat posed by default is real. They could listen to ultra-conservative senators like Tom Coburn, R-Okla., and Saxby Chambliss, R-Ga. -- members of the Gang of Six/Seven whose own profound ideological hostility to Obama and the Democrats still leaves space for prudence.

Or they could listen to more than 60 business groups, from the National Association of Manufacturers and the Chamber of Commerce to the Telecommunications Industry Association and the American Gas Association, all fearful of the consequences of default. Now those business lobbyists may find out why it isn't so smart to fund any bozo running for office who claims to support "free enterprise."

It is revealing to listen to the congressional freshmen affiliated with the tea party as the debt clock ticks down and panic begins to set in. Many of them have repeatedly vowed to vote down any bill to increase the debt limit, but somehow they're sure that if those checks don't go out and that debt doesn't get paid, it will be the president's fault and not theirs. Some say there is no reason why the Treasury should miss any of its bond payments. Others have sent a letter to the White House, urging Obama to "prioritize" those Social Security checks if worse comes to worst.

Such outbursts prove that the tea party is not only against taxes and spending, but is strictly opposed to arithmetic, which like climate science is probably just another socialist plot. They also prove the utter insincerity of these characters, who just voted this week for the "Cut, Cap and Balance" bill that would gut Social Security, along with Medicare, while erecting a constitutional wall around tax breaks for society's wealthiest individuals and corporations. They want to pose as defenders of the middle-class and the American dream, even as they promote legislation that would destroy the programs and institutions that are the foundation of that way of life.

There is no need to look too far to find the source of our discontent -- our "dysfunction," if you must. It is in the Congress, which the American people mistakenly turned over to fakers and fools last November. Every poll shows that most voters regret that error now, and wish that Congress would tax the wealthy and preserve social insurance. Now those voter had better make their remorse heard, and loudly, if they hope to avert catastrophe.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: thisguyisnuts
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last
Comment #21 Removed by Moderator

To: NoGrayZone

>>Is that their “polite” way of stating WE THE PEOPLE are beyond dysfunctional?

That’s exactly what they are saying. They’re also saying that “now that we finally got a real Marxist in the White House, you dumb people aren’t supposed to resist anymore. We’re doing this for YOU!”

In other words, “if rape is inevitable, relax and enjoy it.”


22 posted on 07/23/2011 9:56:53 AM PDT by Bryanw92 (We don't need to win elections. We need to win a revolution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
Obama says that he won't be able to send out Social Security and Veterans Administration checks

  1. Financially speaking, this has been shown to be wrong by so many.
  2. Technically speaking, this would throw gov't programmers into a tizzy trying to get this to happen. It's not like there's one program somewhere that a dweeb at some computer decides to run or not. It's like when Ahnold decided that all gov't employees should make minimum wage; it's just not that easy.

23 posted on 07/23/2011 9:56:57 AM PDT by FourPeas ("Maladjusted and wigging out is no way to go through life, son." -hg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
They want to pose as defenders of the middle-class and the American dream, even as they promote legislation that would destroy the programs and institutions that are the foundation of that way of life.

The middle-class and the American dream are the result of private enterprise, not government largess. It is high taxes and government overspending that are the threat.

24 posted on 07/23/2011 9:56:57 AM PDT by Petrosius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
They could listen to ultra-conservative senators like Tom Coburn, R-Okla., and Saxby Chambliss, R-Ga. -- members of the Gang of Six/Seven whose own profound ideological hostility to Obama and the Democrats still leaves space for prudence.

Or they could listen to the 65-70% that WANT caps on spending without tax increases, or are WE too stupid to even have a voice?

25 posted on 07/23/2011 9:57:02 AM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

What planet is he on?


26 posted on 07/23/2011 9:59:37 AM PDT by cardinal4 (Cain/Netanyahu 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
The left will win the PR battle. I'm wondering whether or not "The Divine One" is hoping for a good constitutional crisis. During such a crisis he and his minions can seize vast amounts of power, pass laws, raise funds, suspend the writ, etc. etc.

Congress being an egotistical squabbling mob is unable to effectively resist a purposeful few.

27 posted on 07/23/2011 9:59:37 AM PDT by AEMILIUS PAULUS (It is a shame that when these people give a riot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
What is dysfunctional is how the neurons work in Conason's brain...

'Fire, Ready, Aim'

28 posted on 07/23/2011 9:59:43 AM PDT by JPG (Palin '12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
Since Mr. Conasan's definition of sanity seems to be in following the same dumb-ass policies that have driven us to the verge of bankruptcy--and he thinks that actually balancing a budget it insane-- I can't put much credence into his opinion.

This nation's ruling elite have demonstrated that they do not have The Mandate of Heaven (to borrow from Chinese culture). They have not ruled well--and they need to go now.

29 posted on 07/23/2011 10:00:02 AM PDT by Lysandru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

Joe Conason, lol.
Sorry. That’s as far as I got. Life is too short.


30 posted on 07/23/2011 10:00:52 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yup2394871293

“Democracy’s a bitch to the MSM elite”.

...it’s a bitch to me too. A Representative Republic works well though!


31 posted on 07/23/2011 10:00:52 AM PDT by albie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
Since Mr. Conasan's definition of sanity seems to be in following the same dumb-ass policies that have driven us to the verge of bankruptcy--and he thinks that actually balancing a budget it insane-- I can't put much credence into his opinion.

This nation's ruling elite have demonstrated that they do not have The Mandate of Heaven (to borrow from Chinese culture). They have not ruled well--and they need to go now.

32 posted on 07/23/2011 10:01:24 AM PDT by Lysandru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

Well, what’s true is this: We cannot govern the country with 75 Members of Congress and 2 Senators.

Tea Partiers who thought we could are stupid.

Change will come when there are <218 dems + reps in the House and <50 in the Senate.


33 posted on 07/23/2011 10:04:53 AM PDT by Jim Noble (Freedom is the freedom to say 2+2=4. If that is granted, all else follows.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: albie

OK, Republican Democracy is.


34 posted on 07/23/2011 10:07:14 AM PDT by yup2394871293
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

No talent left wing hack Joe Conason was last seen with his feet dangling from Bill Clinton’s rear end during Impeachment. Why would Rasmussen have this left wing cuckoo bird write for his website?


35 posted on 07/23/2011 10:08:02 AM PDT by Captain Culpepper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bryanw92

“In other words, “if rape is inevitable, relax and enjoy it.””

Ewwwwwww. That is SO them.


36 posted on 07/23/2011 10:08:29 AM PDT by NoGrayZone ("Islamophobia: The irrational fear of being beheaded." Andrew Klavan of PJTV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
Pardon me, Mr. Conason, while I throw a washtub full of water on your stinking fire: Rasmussen: By 2 to 1, voters fear deal will raise taxes too much, cut spending too little. Also on FR here.
37 posted on 07/23/2011 10:08:49 AM PDT by upchuck (No increase PERIOD! Hope & Change = Ball & Chain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #38 Removed by Moderator

To: Snickering Hound

From your post:

“”Conason was a regular guest and a guest host on The Al Franken Show, where he had the distinction of being the only guest with two theme songs. He made an appearances every Friday as a commentator, as well as co-judging with Al their weekly quiz show Wait, wait, don’t lie to me.””

That says it all, doesn’t it?


39 posted on 07/23/2011 10:18:00 AM PDT by Abathar (Proudly posting without reading the article carefully since 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Captain Culpepper
Why would Rasmussen have this left wing cuckoo bird write for his website?

Rasmussen has a several lefties whose articles appear on his site regularly. Conason, Froma Harrop and Susan Estrich come to mind. But he also has a bunch of conservative writers as well: Debra Saunders, Tony Blankly, Larry Kulow, Michael Barone, etc.

40 posted on 07/23/2011 10:20:08 AM PDT by upchuck (No increase PERIOD! Hope & Change = Ball & Chain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson